I'm wondering if maybe the letter is a way of hinting something to the fans without breaching any agreements, and that some of us (especially me, embarrassingly) may have jumped the gun on that beefhack announcement.
Okay, not wondering, hoping.
Magnatek said:
With this, I have to say...
Atlus is by far one of the most sensitive game developers/publishers out there (almost to a fault). I mean, even Square-Enix had to go through two MMOs before sending an apology or something like this. As for Catherine, sure, I'm miffed that it's likely not being released here, but it doesn't mean that I'd boycott them. I like their other stuff too much for that. As for the message itself, I know it's shallow, but I'd have suggested a different color for the image. Kinda grates on my eyes.
Two points here:
1. Atlus USA still isn't a developer, they publish games. They do, however, publish a lot of games developed by Atlus.
2. The color could perhaps be a reference to a certain game.
Arkley said:
It makes sense to not release it in the USA. Not only is the market for that kind of thing much smaller in the first place, but it'd almost certainly be slapped with an AO rating, meaning virtually no retailers would carry it. Translating and localising a game costs a lot of money. They would, not see a return of investment if they brought the game to the USA - so who can fault them for deciding against it? What would you do if someone asked you to hurl a ton of money in the trash because a relatively small number of people would really enjoy seeing you do it?
I don't see why people assume this game would get an AO, it's certainly got more sexual elements than most mainstream titles, but it's not like it's actually
porn. CERO gave it a C rating, which is the equivalent of a high T or a low M rating from the ESRB. This puts it on the level of Uncharted or MvC3.
By comparison, Killzone 3 and Bayonetta are rated D, which is a step higher.