Accpet Steam's New EULA or Say Goodbye To Your Steam Account UPDATED

Recommended Videos
Mar 5, 2011
690
0
0
I like valve be I hate steam so fucking much. If it wasn't necessary for so many games I wouldn't use it. I try to get retail copies when ever I can.
 

Keltrick

New member
Jun 7, 2010
108
0
0
Wolverine18 said:
Crono1973 said:
Wolverine18 said:
yuval152 said:
Wolverine18 said:
yuval152 said:
http://wegotthiscovered.com/news/valve-accept-steam-subscriber-agreement-disable-account/

So if you disagree.
That's how EVERY online service works.
I already know that I'm just posting news for people to disccuss about.
Help me understand...what is the discussion value of a company using the identical process of every other company?

Maybe you could add some discussion yourself to explain what it is you expect people to discuss. This seems a lot like "the sky is blue...discuss".
Does every other company take away what you have already paid for?
They aren't taking them away. They are saying you can't use their service if you don't agree to their service terms. And yes, every company does that if they have TOS and you don't agree to them.
Actually, no, they don't. With almost every other seller of digital goods, I'm left with the product if I decide to part ways with them. I don't have to agree to a ToS update that iTunes, or the Amazon kindle reader send my way, and if I don't I still retain my songs, ebooks, movies. Why should it be that every other form of media lets me retain my goods, that I purchased, and not games? Steam is as much a 'service' as any of these other retailers are. By all means, bar me from your store, your community and future patches via your client, but not the files I've already paid for.
 

antipirate

New member
Nov 9, 2009
23
0
0
I really don't think the act of owning a game license should be considered a service that's part of a subscription. Buying, downloading, patching and community/multi-player connectivity are services. If a person stops using a service that shouldn't invalidate their ownership of their licenses.

This whole matter bothers me about steam, I just keep using it because I feel it is unlikely to have any practical effect on me but other aspects of steam have practical benefits.
 

Zakarath

New member
Mar 23, 2009
1,244
0
0
Crono1973 said:
yeti585 said:
Here's an idea, instead of deactivating accounts, let's deactivate steam and programs like it (I'm looking at you origin... wait, am I? I've never actually used origin, but if it is like steam in certain regards it is getting the stare of death right now.). I don't like how these programs have a monopoly on big PC titles. I'd rather go out to the store and buy a game on CD.

[sup]Plus, us being able to play the games we shelled out money for relies on the continued success of not only steam, but Valve as a company.[/sup]
Even buying physical copies doesn't help consumers if the game still has to be registered via Steam or Origin and does an online check everytime you start the game.

I have a physical copy of Portal 2 and Skyrim but without Steam, they won't work at all.
Fun Fact: I noticed that the original build of Skyrim (The one on Steam on release day, and I presume on hard copies) would run without communication with Steam if you directly ran Skyrim.exe instead of the skyrim launcher, meaning they effectively released a cracked version of the game. They patched it pretty quick, but not before I backed up a copy.

You can't take the Sky(rim) from me ;)
 

General Twinkletoes

Suppository of Wisdom
Jan 24, 2011
1,426
0
0
This isn't really a huge new thing where they're pullinng anti consumer BS. You don't agree to the ToS, you don't use the service. Is this different for anything else?
 

Flunk

New member
Feb 17, 2008
915
0
0
You guys do know that even if they put that in their ToS it doesn't actually stop you from suing them with a class action suit. No term of service can limit your legal rights. In fact, both software licenses and terms of service are dubiously legal at best.

Just something to keep in mind should it come down to it.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Wolverine18 said:
Help me understand...what is the discussion value of a company using the identical process of every other company?
To be fair, if EA did this, the internet would be losing its collective shit.

EDIT: In fact, when other companies did exactly this, people lost their collective shit.

Valve does it, and the reaction is "so?"

I think this is quite telling, but hey.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Buretsu said:
I'd imagine that Origin is like this, and any other DD service that doubles as DRM likely works the same way.
The difference being, this was one of the reasons everyone hated Origin.
 

Tranquility

New member
Aug 4, 2012
87
0
0
How does this work in the UK?

With them recently allowing digital copies to be "resold" as digital copies mean you own the object...how can Valve take away your access to that?
 

CrazyBlaze

New member
Jul 12, 2011
945
0
0
Jmp_man said:
Crono1973 said:
yeti585 said:
Here's an idea, instead of deactivating accounts, let's deactivate steam and programs like it (I'm looking at you origin... wait, am I? I've never actually used origin, but if it is like steam in certain regards it is getting the stare of death right now.). I don't like how these programs have a monopoly on big PC titles. I'd rather go out to the store and buy a game on CD.

[sup]Plus, us being able to play the games we shelled out money for relies on the continued success of not only steam, but Valve as a company.[/sup]
Even buying physical copies doesn't help consumers if the game still has to be registered via Steam or Origin and does an online check everytime you start the game.

I have a physical copy of Portal 2 and Skyrim but without Steam, they won't work at all.
Hold on, hold on, hold on...

You can't play your PHYSICAL COPY of Skyrim w/out Steam? If that's true than something is messed up around here.

If I don't agree to the next PSN EULA, will my games stop working?
Not quite...

14. CHANGES TO THESE CONDITIONS

We may make changes to these Conditions from time to time. You will be notified of material changes by a posting as you sign in to Sony Entertainment Network, by PSN message or by email to your current email address as registered on your Sony Entertainment Network account. To access a printable, current copy of these Conditions, go to http://eu.playstation.com/legal or www.sonyentertainmentnetwork.com. Please check regularly to ensure that you are aware of any changes. Your continued use of Sony Entertainment Network (via a Master Account or Sub Account) after any changes signifies acceptance of these changes by you and any Sub Account holders. If you do not accept changes to these Conditions you must stop using Sony Entertainment Network. If you are a Master Account holder and there are funds in your wallet prior to your refusal to accept changes to the Conditions, you must contact us and we will terminate your account (and any associated Sub Accounts) and refund any unused wallet funds. You will not be able to access Sony Entertainment Network.

We may assign our rights and obligations under these Conditions without your consent provided that such assignment does not adversely affect your rights under these Conditions.
Source: http://legaldoc.dl.playstation.net/ps3-eula/psn/e/e_tosua_en.html

Basically by continuing to use their service after they change their EULA you are automatically agreeing to their changes.
(Basically it's self policing I guess...)

Question. How much exposure to gaming sites have you for the past three or more years. Now days almost every non-indie new release has a form of online DRM even if you have the CD. Some games have a code you have to input. Steam and Origin are like that code, except that no code has to be in putted. They check your computer every time and you can't play a game without the program running.

OT: So they are changing their ToS. Does Valve have a lot of class action law suits against them? I mean they provide great service and from what I've heard their customer support is very good. I can't see them being sued for millions often. I mean I can understand Sony after the PSN outage last summer. But Valve seems to be pretty good about this stuff.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Unless the terms of service involve me donating my organs to them at a time of their convenience I don't really care.


There is also some Origin guy somewhere looking at all the cat pics I have on my PC.
 

Jaeke

New member
Feb 25, 2010
1,431
0
0
Ummm...
I disagree'd so I could look it over online and came back and had no problems at all.

They just gave me the option again.
 

Tranquility

New member
Aug 4, 2012
87
0
0
Akalabeth said:
Doesn't matter, people will still use and vehemently defend Steam because they're not too bright.

"OH MY GOD! THIS GAME I DIDN'T NEED IS ON SALE! STEAM IS DA BOMB!"
As opposed to...

"OMG THIS GAME I PLAYED MORE THAN A DECADE AGO IS...FULL PRICE?"

Let's take a show of hands, how many people in this forum have taken part in a class action lawsuit against Steam? None? Interesting.

While I agree the entire thing is dumb and cannot see how it is legal (aside from the precedent), it won't have any impact on 99% of the people using Steam.
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Luftwaffles said:
If you didnt agree to the original TOS in the first place you wouldnt even be using Steam.

If you've accepted the old TOS and then changed your mind, they wouldve taken away your account too.

People are actually outraged about this?
People are outraged by the newest amendment to the ToS, because they view it as "reducing consumer rights", although it conveniently doubles as "Valve covering their asses". Google it if you care.

I agreed to the terms, because I didn't have a problem with them. If Steam pushed something I didn't like, I would have no issues whatsoever with no longer using them. I've always been aware that not accepting the ToS would mean losing my games. I've been starting to hoard physical/DRM free copies of my games anyways.
Same here. I honestly had no problem agreeing to the new EULA/TOS. If I ever need to sue Valve, I would rather it be done in small claims court, with Valve footing the bill, rather than worrying about (often frivolous) class-action suits. Besides, if Valve does do something extremely egregious and a large number of people decide to attempt to bring a class-action suit against them, the courts may still hear the case; regardless of the TOS.

Oh, and I also have both digital and physical back-ups of almost all of my Steam games.

You know...just in case.

Though, every time there's a big batch of updates and patches it can take a while to update all of my back-ups. Tis the only drawback.

Thankfully, Steams in-client back-up utility is quite handy. (and fairly quick)
 

lowkey_jotunn

New member
Feb 23, 2011
223
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
Wolverine18 said:
Help me understand...what is the discussion value of a company using the identical process of every other company?
To be fair, if EA did this, the internet would be losing its collective shit.

EDIT: In fact, when other companies did exactly this, people lost their collective shit.

Valve does it, and the reaction is "so?"

I think this is quite telling, but hey.
While I definitely don't give Steam a free-pass on this, they've engendered enough good will over the years that I will "wait and see."

Steam has been around for, what, a decade now? And I've personally never heard of any serious shenanigans on their part (feel free to tell me about any I missed) so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt for the moment. Though if this ToS turns into a giant clusterfuck, I'll be right there with my torch and pitchfork.

Origin, on the other hand, is new to the whole digital-marketplace landscape, and is just the fancy name for "EA Store." EA has a long reputation of dickishness, and driving great game franchises into mediocrity. They've earned no such good will from the gaming community, so ya ...

People will jump on EA's shit, while letting Steam slide (for now, at least.) Congratulations on figuring out one minor aspect of the human condition.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
Man, it's almost like Valve are exactly the same as every other company and business ever.

Who'da thunk?

Actually, I would. Because every single time Valve do something that annoys their fanboys I delight in pointing out that there is no real appreciable difference between Valve and anyone else (EA, Activision etc) because they are all big businesses in it to make money, and they are all one wrong step away from earning the eternal ire of those same fanboys who would defend them to the death.

When Valve makes HL2:E3 and it isn't worth the development time... well.

'The one thing they love more than a hero is to see a hero fail, fall, die trying. In spite of everything you've done for them, eventually they will hate you.'

or, if you prefer something more recent

They need you right now, but when they don't, they'll cast you out, like a leper.