I like valve be I hate steam so fucking much. If it wasn't necessary for so many games I wouldn't use it. I try to get retail copies when ever I can.
Actually, no, they don't. With almost every other seller of digital goods, I'm left with the product if I decide to part ways with them. I don't have to agree to a ToS update that iTunes, or the Amazon kindle reader send my way, and if I don't I still retain my songs, ebooks, movies. Why should it be that every other form of media lets me retain my goods, that I purchased, and not games? Steam is as much a 'service' as any of these other retailers are. By all means, bar me from your store, your community and future patches via your client, but not the files I've already paid for.Wolverine18 said:They aren't taking them away. They are saying you can't use their service if you don't agree to their service terms. And yes, every company does that if they have TOS and you don't agree to them.Crono1973 said:Does every other company take away what you have already paid for?Wolverine18 said:Help me understand...what is the discussion value of a company using the identical process of every other company?yuval152 said:I already know that I'm just posting news for people to disccuss about.Wolverine18 said:That's how EVERY online service works.yuval152 said:http://wegotthiscovered.com/news/valve-accept-steam-subscriber-agreement-disable-account/
So if you disagree.
Maybe you could add some discussion yourself to explain what it is you expect people to discuss. This seems a lot like "the sky is blue...discuss".
Fun Fact: I noticed that the original build of Skyrim (The one on Steam on release day, and I presume on hard copies) would run without communication with Steam if you directly ran Skyrim.exe instead of the skyrim launcher, meaning they effectively released a cracked version of the game. They patched it pretty quick, but not before I backed up a copy.Crono1973 said:Even buying physical copies doesn't help consumers if the game still has to be registered via Steam or Origin and does an online check everytime you start the game.yeti585 said:Here's an idea, instead of deactivating accounts, let's deactivate steam and programs like it (I'm looking at you origin... wait, am I? I've never actually used origin, but if it is like steam in certain regards it is getting the stare of death right now.). I don't like how these programs have a monopoly on big PC titles. I'd rather go out to the store and buy a game on CD.
[sup]Plus, us being able to play the games we shelled out money for relies on the continued success of not only steam, but Valve as a company.[/sup]
I have a physical copy of Portal 2 and Skyrim but without Steam, they won't work at all.
To be fair, if EA did this, the internet would be losing its collective shit.Wolverine18 said:Help me understand...what is the discussion value of a company using the identical process of every other company?
The difference being, this was one of the reasons everyone hated Origin.Buretsu said:I'd imagine that Origin is like this, and any other DD service that doubles as DRM likely works the same way.
Jmp_man said:Hold on, hold on, hold on...Crono1973 said:Even buying physical copies doesn't help consumers if the game still has to be registered via Steam or Origin and does an online check everytime you start the game.yeti585 said:Here's an idea, instead of deactivating accounts, let's deactivate steam and programs like it (I'm looking at you origin... wait, am I? I've never actually used origin, but if it is like steam in certain regards it is getting the stare of death right now.). I don't like how these programs have a monopoly on big PC titles. I'd rather go out to the store and buy a game on CD.
[sup]Plus, us being able to play the games we shelled out money for relies on the continued success of not only steam, but Valve as a company.[/sup]
I have a physical copy of Portal 2 and Skyrim but without Steam, they won't work at all.
You can't play your PHYSICAL COPY of Skyrim w/out Steam? If that's true than something is messed up around here.
Not quite...If I don't agree to the next PSN EULA, will my games stop working?
Source: http://legaldoc.dl.playstation.net/ps3-eula/psn/e/e_tosua_en.html14. CHANGES TO THESE CONDITIONS
We may make changes to these Conditions from time to time. You will be notified of material changes by a posting as you sign in to Sony Entertainment Network, by PSN message or by email to your current email address as registered on your Sony Entertainment Network account. To access a printable, current copy of these Conditions, go to http://eu.playstation.com/legal or www.sonyentertainmentnetwork.com. Please check regularly to ensure that you are aware of any changes. Your continued use of Sony Entertainment Network (via a Master Account or Sub Account) after any changes signifies acceptance of these changes by you and any Sub Account holders. If you do not accept changes to these Conditions you must stop using Sony Entertainment Network. If you are a Master Account holder and there are funds in your wallet prior to your refusal to accept changes to the Conditions, you must contact us and we will terminate your account (and any associated Sub Accounts) and refund any unused wallet funds. You will not be able to access Sony Entertainment Network.
We may assign our rights and obligations under these Conditions without your consent provided that such assignment does not adversely affect your rights under these Conditions.
Basically by continuing to use their service after they change their EULA you are automatically agreeing to their changes.
(Basically it's self policing I guess...)
As opposed to...Akalabeth said:Doesn't matter, people will still use and vehemently defend Steam because they're not too bright.
"OH MY GOD! THIS GAME I DIDN'T NEED IS ON SALE! STEAM IS DA BOMB!"
Same here. I honestly had no problem agreeing to the new EULA/TOS. If I ever need to sue Valve, I would rather it be done in small claims court, with Valve footing the bill, rather than worrying about (often frivolous) class-action suits. Besides, if Valve does do something extremely egregious and a large number of people decide to attempt to bring a class-action suit against them, the courts may still hear the case; regardless of the TOS.lacktheknack said:People are outraged by the newest amendment to the ToS, because they view it as "reducing consumer rights", although it conveniently doubles as "Valve covering their asses". Google it if you care.Luftwaffles said:If you didnt agree to the original TOS in the first place you wouldnt even be using Steam.
If you've accepted the old TOS and then changed your mind, they wouldve taken away your account too.
People are actually outraged about this?
I agreed to the terms, because I didn't have a problem with them. If Steam pushed something I didn't like, I would have no issues whatsoever with no longer using them. I've always been aware that not accepting the ToS would mean losing my games. I've been starting to hoard physical/DRM free copies of my games anyways.
While I definitely don't give Steam a free-pass on this, they've engendered enough good will over the years that I will "wait and see."Zachary Amaranth said:To be fair, if EA did this, the internet would be losing its collective shit.Wolverine18 said:Help me understand...what is the discussion value of a company using the identical process of every other company?
EDIT: In fact, when other companies did exactly this, people lost their collective shit.
Valve does it, and the reaction is "so?"
I think this is quite telling, but hey.