Adam Jensen said:I don't understand why anyone would think that this story was even newsworthy. Yet so many gaming oriented websites latched onto it like there's nothing else to write about. Like, I don't know, video games? Even if it turned out that it was a real female player it would still be a non-story. Who gives a shit?Dreiko said:I don't buy the social experiment excuse. It's just something to say to avoid getting blamed. No 17 year old will do all this for some unspecified experiment and then not present any findings or somehow summarize the results but just go away unceremoniously.
It's really easy to prove you're good at a game if you actually are so I don't see any esports related issues for women stemming from this and I am competitive with fighting games so I have lots of tournament experience to go by. You just play one match and the skill of your foe will instantly shine through if they're good, even if they're having their worst day ever. Hell, just because women are rare, the one really good one you fight is all that much more memorable.
What we should focus on is the ease with which journalists which are supposed to be for gamers will turn against us for the sake of something else such as equality or feminism or what have you. If that's their perspective they're feminism journalists talking about games and not games journalists and I think we really need to highlight that difference going forward and not grant them the authority that ought be wielded by one whose foremost goal is the wellbeing of gaming to the expense of other goals.
The problem stems from the fact that typical plebeian discourse absolutely must contain a suitable level of drama and dysfunction to be considered worthwhile. It?s like the saying,
?Small minds gossip, average minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas.?
These people are fishing for gossip because they don?t have the intellectual capacity for anything more.