Our problem with calling things Communist or Fascist has to do mostly with our media. Our two sides love to use extreme and shocking words (true or not) to make the other side look as undesirable as possible. Both sides are guilty of this. (Consider our movies. More shock value than actual content. For example count the swear words. Pretty soon though that's going to bow to the law of diminishing returns.)MGlBlaze said:Your image is kind of broken for me, but upon entering the image URL directly; we call them 'crisps'.bushwhacker2k said:I have not, but I hope to someday.pulse2 said:I have a question for American's, how many of you have visited the UK?
I have a question: What do British folk call:
[image=http://images.fastcompany.com/upload/lays-potato-chips-regular.jpg]
My question from the UK to people in the USA;
Not sure if it's been asked here before or if it's changes recently, but what is some Americans' problem with public healthcare and calling things 'communist' or 'fascist' as a kind of knee-jerk reaction to anything (which rarely relates in any way to what communism or fascism actally is)?
EDIT;
[ img ] [ /img ]bushwhacker2k said:Also how do I post a picture? It's relevant to a question.
Use those tags without spaces, and but the image url in between them. Like this (You can see it through a quote);
![]()
Most of us also do not have a problem with public healthcare. The rich however (who make a great deal of money from the current system) have a big problem with it. The real problem is that they can not see the mounting logical support behind the theory that it's just going to cost them more in the long run anyway. The old guard is stubborn and they have lots of fighting cash. The progresive side of the arguement? Not so much.