NoMoreSanity said:A woman sued a another woman who saved her from a burning car due to her being paralyzed while being saved.
Sure you can be my secratary or something.popdafoo said:Yeah it's people abusing the law system. Who wants to go make a brand new country with me and not let any assholes in?
well you can sue for anything really, whether or not you will win or have your case thrown out is another. this would be covered under the Samaritan law: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_lawCartman2nd said:Wow, that law system over there is pretty f*cked up in the US. How the hell would you be able to sue someone for this?
NoMoreSanity said:A woman sued a another woman who saved her from a burning car due to her being paralyzed while being saved.
That one's actually an urban myth where the woman put the car on cruise control and sat in that back seat and read a magazine.leeloodallasmultipass said:The Lawsuit where The owner of a RV Sued the manufacturer after crashing, They placed the RV on Cruise Control and went out back to make themselfs a coffee, Subsequently crashing the vehicle as it went off the road. They won the court case becuase the manufacturer hadnt placed instructions in the manual about staying at the wheel whilst in Cruise control.... Everyone knows thats common sense.. but unfortunatly in the legal system, common sense doesnt exist. and
Bulletinmybrain said:Fuck lawyers. All they do is weasel their way around the system, making congressmen have to do all kinds of work. (If they do any at all, after they get elected they just party.)
Sure, blame the lawyers.....The Rogue Wolf said:First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. (Thank you, William Shakespeare, for that wonderful quote.)
You shouldn't believe it because like so many of these posts. It's probably not true. The only scenario is if the woman being pulled from said car was concious and said "No, don't help me!" and was pulled out anyway.Cartman2nd said:Wow, that law system over there is pretty f*cked up in the US. How the hell would you be able to sue someone for this?
NoMoreSanity said:A woman sued a another woman who saved her from a burning car due to her being paralyzed while being saved.
Why thank you Peter.pimppeter2 said:
Well, yah, a good many are just fake, but they're fun all the same.ace_of_something said:You shouldn't believe it because like so many of these posts. It's probably not true. The only scenario is if the woman being pulled from said car was concious and said "No, don't help me!" and was pulled out anyway.Cartman2nd said:Wow, that law system over there is pretty f*cked up in the US. How the hell would you be able to sue someone for this?
NoMoreSanity said:A woman sued a another woman who saved her from a burning car due to her being paralyzed while being saved.
We have these;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law
Sorry that was my 'make sure people know america isn't made of a solid mass of idiots who breathe idiot air and drink idiot water' reflex.pamplemousse said:Well, yah, a good many are just fake, but they're fun all the same.ace_of_something said:You shouldn't believe it because like so many of these posts. It's probably not true. The only scenario is if the woman being pulled from said car was concious and said "No, don't help me!" and was pulled out anyway.Cartman2nd said:Wow, that law system over there is pretty f*cked up in the US. How the hell would you be able to sue someone for this?
NoMoreSanity said:A woman sued a another woman who saved her from a burning car due to her being paralyzed while being saved.
We have these;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law
I didn't even know those laws existed . . . now I fell bad about leaving that dying mugging victim I passed bleeding in the street . . .ace_of_something said:Sorry that was my 'make sure people know america isn't made of a solid mass of idiots who breathe idiot air and drink idiot water' reflex.pamplemousse said:Well, yah, a good many are just fake, but they're fun all the same.ace_of_something said:You shouldn't believe it because like so many of these posts. It's probably not true. The only scenario is if the woman being pulled from said car was concious and said "No, don't help me!" and was pulled out anyway.Cartman2nd said:Wow, that law system over there is pretty f*cked up in the US. How the hell would you be able to sue someone for this?
NoMoreSanity said:A woman sued a another woman who saved her from a burning car due to her being paralyzed while being saved.
We have these;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law
I can't remember if it's true, but I've been told that in England (I think) you can do anything you want to someone who's inside your home without permission as long as you don't kill them. I doubt it's true though. If it's not, it should be, although some people might bend that to their will.mentor07825 said:A burglar suing the victims because they fought back. In Ireland, you can do that.
If someone came into your house to steal or terrorise, you cannot use a weapon against them, as it is "preparing for attack" or something like that. The only way around it was if the burglar came on to the second floor, and you have your weapon on the second floor.
Anyway, long story short, the burglar won due to the "assault" against the victims.
This is why we take the law in our own hands here in Ireland. And whatever you do, don't fuck with the farmers.
Afraid not, responses must be reasonable and proportionate. It's rather complex based on not just the weapons used (its not proportional if someone breaks in with a wiffle bat to use a flamethrower in retaliation), but also the person, an old lady would get away with more that say an SAS member, and also how far they are into your house (more threatening if they're in that in the garden).Cheesus333 said:I can't remember if it's true, but I've been told that in England (I think) you can do anything you want to someone who's inside your home without permission as long as you don't kill them. I doubt it's true though. If it's not, it should be, although some people might bend that to their will.
The guy probably didn't even look at the manual to begin with (or taught himself how to drive). What disturbs me the most about this is the fact that it implies that he has done this before.leeloodallasmultipass said:They won the court case becuase the manufacturer hadnt placed instructions in the manual about staying at the wheel whilst in Cruise control.... Everyone knows thats common sense.. but unfortunatly in the legal system, common sense doesnt exist.