exactly my pointThe Rockerfly said:Wait for DDOSing? That's ridiculous, all it involves is going to a website all at once. You could charge anyone with that whenever a website goes down
Serves them right though, should have used proxys
exactly my pointThe Rockerfly said:Wait for DDOSing? That's ridiculous, all it involves is going to a website all at once. You could charge anyone with that whenever a website goes down
Serves them right though, should have used proxys
that,s anonymous, best strength and weakness if a member where to get caught (like in this case) he/she wouldnt know anything about the other members on the other hand anonymous might and up fighting itself (for example Boxy)Sejs Cube said:It's delightful how people seem to think Anonymous is in any way organized. Like there are various divisions and some sort of an agenda. It's adorable, truly it is.
Anon: not your personal army.
Well noone doing an actual DDoS is doing from their computer because you can't flood anyone on your own, you get dupes like the guys who were arrested to do it for you.thethingthatlurks said:No, I don't think it's even possible to hide your information when doing a DDoS. If you're behind a proxy, it is going to take the attack.Roboto said:Maybe the designer of LOIC did not make it hide the source on purpose as a form of sabotage.
Most of these dipshits used LOIC from there home connections so changing there local ip to the internal side of their home router (with release and renew) would have made no difference to the IP that the attack was seen to come from. Anyone who cannot spoof a source IP deserves to get caught. That said I no for a fact that a lot of the LOIC attacks failed when the suckers behind it googled "spoof IP" and got the attack dropped by uRPF 'cos the used an IP in the wrong range.yami0333 said:Does anyone know ip release, ip renew, or at least changing the ip. That said I don't condone hacking in anyway shape or form
They can get a maximum of 10 years imprisonment under the Computer Misuse Act 1990Raven said:Not really much they can charge them with. There are so many people involved with DDoS attacks that It'd be a huge waste of resources just to track them down and charge them with something.
Actually, it would make sense to me to say "Southern England", but admittedly, YMMV. There's more to the South than just the "Home Counties" you know... Bleh, anyway, idiots got what the idiots deserved! As did the two Dutch guys that were arrested in December, hopefully more idiots will be caught and punished.catalyst8 said:'Lower England'? No! That doesn't make any sense even if you substitute 'Lower' with 'Southern'. It wasn't a series of Home Counties raids, they were split up across England.
You can't, not yet. These idiots just don't know how to hide themselves.Azaraxzealot said:and people said that you cant police the internet?
HA! justice is served!
they should be thankful they are not getting Crackdown justice on their asses. imagine that wont you?
With how busy our prisons are, no judge is going to sentence one of these guys for 10 years, not for the crime of "organised logging on to a website"... It's ridiculous and a big waste of money tracking these guys down. It'd be like the police hunting down every single kid whoever smoked a joint. Which is why police focus on the big fish in big drug busts.catalyst8 said:They can get a maximum of 10 years imprisonment under the Computer Misuse Act 1990Raven said:Not really much they can charge them with. There are so many people involved with DDoS attacks that It'd be a huge waste of resources just to track them down and charge them with something.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/contents
Well, obviously "Hacker Group attacks Site X" makes for a better headline than "Kids DDos Site for 3 Hours, Sysadmin mildly annoyed".Klepa said:I like it how Greg Tito and every single person here knows fully well that 'Anonymous' is not a hacker group, but still calls it that in news headlines.
I'd say the story runs a little different, to simply arresting some weak kids because of pressure. I suspect that an investigation was run, and when it turned out these kiddies were easy to find the coppers thought '"Sweet, easy pickings, we'll nab 'em" and off they trotted to make some arrests. After which they make a song and dance about it hoping to deter other script kiddies from similar acts. Had they hidden themselves properly the cops would have done what they always do when it comes to DDoS attacks, sat on their arses and done next to nothing.Raven said:With how busy our prisons are, no judge is going to sentence one of these guys for 10 years, not for the crime of "organised logging on to a website"... It's ridiculous and a big waste of money tracking these guys down. It'd be like the police hunting down every single kid whoever smoked a joint. Which is why police focus on the big fish in big drug busts.
Seems like this eCrime department is just under pressure to deliver any kind of result in response to these attacks...