I never understood that. Child porn is illegal cause its abusive/exploiting children, but a cartoon drawing isn't a child. When someone makes/watches cartoon porn of kids, yes its really weird, but no child is being harmed.OutrageousEmu said:Well, if they're drawings of underage people, it actually is counted as child porn.Jegsimmons said:in his defense, its artwork of fictional characters haveing sexual acts, not actual child porn.OutrageousEmu said:...did you just defend child porn? You're defending child porn. You also pretty much just said "don't act like kids aren't unbelievably sexy", which only makes it creepier.omegawyrm said:Yeah, humans definitely don't have any erotic experiences until they're 18. Moore is a weird pervert and his work should be totally disregarded because he ever suggested otherwise.OutrageousEmu said:No, he went insane and wrote some kind of erotic fanfiction about 13 year old girls from fairytales.Soviet Heavy said:That would be Alan Moore mister Tito. Not Frank Miller. At least Moore never went insane and tried to make a shitty sequel to his magnum opus.
This. I can't stand FOXnews but they have the right to spew whatever venomous nonsense they choose.Worgen said:I cant wait to see how this goes down, fox has deserved to be hit for awhile, altho freedom of speech means freedom for speech you hate also.
That's somethign I don't understand. If you're a kid on the playground and you get called bad names or teased so you respond by punching the other kid in defense. It's considered sticking up for yourself. Yet When Anon wants to try to stop a big name corporate news group from slander and vicious conservative attacks based on very poor research, it's considered messing with free speech.MajorDolphin said:This. I can't stand FOXnews but they have the right to spew whatever venomous nonsense they choose.
I dunno, I think Anonymous isn't anything more than what it appears - a group dedicated to raising mischief, for good or ill.SidingWithTheEnemy said:Probably Anon is just a bunch of IT security experts trying to get firms paranoid enough to tighten security and hire new staff. So that the guys from Anon get more job offers and a decent wage for a change...SnakeoilSage said:Look at it this way, Fox. Now you have reason to start securing those servers in hopes of protecting them from Anonymous.
But wait, if you hire on new IT help, doesn't that make Anonymous a "job creator?" Or do you need to be one of those 1%'ers? I guess we'll find out.
And then we forget about all the crap Fox feeds to the general population, they do more slander and bending of the truth then anyone else. We also forget the good Anonymous does outside of this hacking, google it, you might find out some interesting stuff.El Zorro said:They defend Assange and Wikileaks in the name of freedom of speech, but have no problem shutting up a news station that makes fun of their wall street movement...they sound like a bunch of hypocrit-DDOS:El_Zorro
Two way street...AxelxGabriel said:That's somethign I don't understand. If you're a kid on the playground and you get called bad names or teased so you respond by punching the other kid in defense. It's considered sticking up for yourself. Yet When Anon wants to try to stop a big name corporate news group from slander and vicious conservative attacks based on very poor research, it's considered messing with free speech.MajorDolphin said:This. I can't stand FOXnews but they have the right to spew whatever venomous nonsense they choose.
What next? Should African Americans not get pissed if a white guy says the N word becuase he has every right in free speech to say it?
If you respond to an insult with a punch in the face, then you are responding with excessive force.AxelxGabriel said:That's somethign I don't understand. If you're a kid on the playground and you get called bad names or teased so you respond by punching the other kid in defense. It's considered sticking up for yourself. Yet When Anon wants to try to stop a big name corporate news group from slander and vicious conservative attacks based on very poor research, it's considered messing with free speech.MajorDolphin said:This. I can't stand FOXnews but they have the right to spew whatever venomous nonsense they choose.
What next? Should African Americans not get pissed if a white guy says the N word becuase he has every right in free speech to say it?
Because, and here's the kicker, LIFE.. is what YOU make of it.AxelxGabriel said:To be honest, in the end as much as I support Anon to do this, it'll mean nothing in the long run.
Fox News will still be on for years to come, still considered the most popular news show in America and continue to give the same biased, hypocritical and poorly researched "news" as they always have.
It's times like this I'm surprised people don't just blow their own brains out over how effed up the world is.
You don't actually have any idea what you're talking about do you? Try actually reading Lost Girls and being more aware of what an author writes next time you want to dismiss one like that.OutrageousEmu said:...did you just defend child porn? You're defending child porn. You also pretty much just said "don't act like kids aren't unbelievably sexy", which only makes it creepier.omegawyrm said:Yeah, humans definitely don't have any erotic experiences until they're 18. Moore is a weird pervert and his work should be totally disregarded because he ever suggested otherwise.OutrageousEmu said:No, he went insane and wrote some kind of erotic fanfiction about 13 year old girls from fairytales.Soviet Heavy said:That would be Alan Moore mister Tito. Not Frank Miller. At least Moore never went insane and tried to make a shitty sequel to his magnum opus.