This. Deep down we are still animals with survival instincts, and by default we look out for ourselves more than eachother, and sometimes that makes people seem like jerks. But doing evil things for the hell of it doesn't come naturally.CloakedOne said:"evil" is a point of view. I say that we are inherently selfish.
For the most part, you are right my friendSulfuricDonut said:I had to answer this question in English once, here's how my answer went. (I don't even know if this is the kind of answer you wanted, but oh well)
--People are not naturally evil, or savage, but are simply selfish.
-Good and Evil are simply labels based on opinion, and humans tend to believe that their own opinions are always right, therefore that people who differ from their society are evil. Since we live in a society that doesn't condone murder, we believe that murder is an 'evil' thing and should not be practiced. However other people may disagree because they believe murder is a way for them to get what they want.
-There is no reason that our own opinions of 'good' and 'evil' are more valid than others, but we will always think that they are, because people are selfish.
--So therefore if we all grew up in a world without society's influence, then many of us would hurt others to ensure our own survival, not thinking about the welfare of others. But without our society, such acts would then not be considered evil either, since we would have no outside opinions influencing our own.
Humans created evil so it is in fact that Evil is Inherently HUMAN!number4096 said:Considering that most of our actions in everyday life are influenced by fears of retributions,what would happen if we were devoid of any fears of retributions,personal restraints and survival instincts?
If we were brought down to our most natural selves and would behave purely on the account of what passes through our minds without restraints,
would we immediately do evil things?if so,does that mean that we are naturally led toward evil on a genetic basis?
One must take into account that in most video games,the fun comes mostly from killing creatures.
So in this context someone who likes to play violent video games would logically do in real life what they do in the game.
So the question is,what would you do if there was no repercussions possible for your actions and you could do as you please?
If you feel uneasy answering,then just think about what you would do and then imagine everyone around you doing that.
Ok so far all you've posted about is bullying, so I take it the mean 8th grader has been pushing your head into the toilet one too many times.number4096 said:If people behaved out of selfishness,they would never bully,seek power,had arenas with lions and an audience were a knife in the back would have been sufficient,they would never abuse their authority on you unless it would be materially beneficient to them,sadomasochism would be inexistant and the bullies would never get popular by bullying you and would pass off as repugnant instead.
Amongst many other things.
Also,violent video games would have never existed because people would never buy them.
If people were merely selfish they would merely assure their survival and live like hermits and they would abuse authority,bully you or make fun of you only if they had something material to obtain out of it that would be necessary for their survival at the moment.