It's all a matter of how well it's pulled off. If it's a tasteless pantomime of naked-faced sexuality in which a hyper-effeminate man in hot pants hip thrusts unicorns at you, played straight or played for laughs, it's not going to have a positive impact at all. If it's about an openly queer character with depth, personality, and character arc of their own, then I'm behind it all the way.grassgremlin said:Can a game star the cross-dresser, the transgender, the overtly gay lead and be accepted?
If it's the unicorn-crotch game I mentioned above, it probably will and I'll be pretty pissed off myself, but a tastefully written game would either evoke praise or apathy from people not waving "God Hates Fags" placards.grassgremlin said:Could it cause an uproar of mass proportions.
I guess it could work as long as there's more to the game than just "it's very, very gay". There would also have to make sense. Are we making a game about the Velvet Panthers? A crack commando squad of of post-op trans men? Or is it something people can relate to? A mainstream game with a niche interest would need to find ways to appeal to everyone, not just other LGBT people.grassgremlin said:The games I'm referring to are beyond simple niche. I'm talking games gone mainstream. A fighting game full of queer/trans characters, jrpg, action rpg, the skies the limits.
I'm finding it hard to see how you could fit all or most elements of the spectrum into a single game in a viable way. The story would have to inclusive without alienating people unfamiliar with LGBT issues.grassgremlin said:I'm hitting all spectrum of Queer. From the cross-dresser, Otokonoko, transvestite, the gay bear, to the twink, from the transgender of either gender.
I don't really get what you mean. Do you mean a mainstream game with a character of Paris is Burning levels of queer involved in a context we might see in any other type of game?grassgremlin said:I'm not talking about an aside reference or mainstream representation either. I'm saying all the way queer, just about as much of it as there is of heterosexuality in games.
I'm a happily cysgendered gay girl, but I like to roleplay as all kinds of characters including males, people with gender dysphorias, asexual elves, pansexual space monsters etc. I could easily play as a queer character but I just wouldn't be interested in a game that's just about someone being outrageously queer without an engaging narrative and gameplay. I get the impression that you're talking about a game for which the only interesting element is the shock value, and that would just bore me.grassgremlin said:Just how comfortable are you with it. Just how queer can a game be before it reaches the threshold you have in place.
I don't really like this "how ready we are" statement; like society must traverse a path of enlightenment before we can play really queer video games. I've never had to be "ready" for a video game because it's a non issue for me. A game with heavily queer elements has to stand up to the same rigour and will be judged by the same merits as a classicly "male", "hegemonic", or "heteronormative" game.grassgremlin said:I find this topic intriguing for various reasons. With all the recent conversation of diversity in gaming culture, I wonder just how ready we are for something on that level.
I don't know your brother, be he might just be put off by the style out of preference independent of prejudices. If someone doesn't like a cyberpunk style it doesn't mean they're racist against replicants.grassgremlin said:Related Story: My brother lamented discomfort in playing the video game Jojo's Bizarre Adventure All Star Battle. Despite the majority of the cast being straight, it was a fighting game far too queer for him due to the vogue-like poses and the fabulous 80s style clothing.
This is actually a shorter, better version of my argumentOrphan81 said:If the game is fun, than it's all that matters in the end. If you set out specifically saying you want to tell a Queer Story, and have Queer elements in your game, better make sure the game is actually fun.
Gosh, that was really well done! I loved how Traynor and Cortez were perfectly rounded characters whose sexuality weren't just their defining or central elements of their personalities! I was so impressed with Bioware's treatment of gay characters in ME3 when Cortez mentioned his husband because nobody else on the crew gave a shit. It was like his sexuality didn't even register with them because it wasn't important, and this is all the more apparent during the silly "buddy" moments between Cortez and the seemingly macho James. That was awesome!Happyninja42 said:Well, considering you could have a gay Shepherd in ME, and that didn't get too much insane wrath about it, and the game was pretty popular, I'd say it's possible.
Completely agreed. I wouldn't even say the negative reactions would be because it's "too gay", but because the story most likely wouldn't be interesting enough. If Rain Man had just been about the struggled of an autistic guy, it wouldn't have been so popular, but a movie about an autistic savant is way more interesting.Happyninja42 said:I think it would depend on how central the character's sexuality/gender identification is to the story. If it's just "a thing" about him/her, while the game is actually focused on other stuff happening, I think the backlash will be less insane. If the entire game is about the character's sexual/gender identification, then you will probably have more negative reactions.
Completely agreedHappyninja42 said:short version: make the character 3 dimensional, and give them other traits aside from "i'm gay/trans" and the game will probably do just fine. Make it nothing but that fact, and focus the entire game on it, and you will probably have a lot of problems.
Exactly. And the absolute worst thing you could do is make a huge fucking deal about it. I'm going to be sold on the story, gameplay, and character development, not on how queer the character is.BeoW0lfe said:The point here is there's a difference between having a character be out of the 'straight white 30ish man' mold, and being a statement instead of a character. If they make a character who is a character before a statement, I'd try it. What I'm concerned about is that we might get a protag/pc that is defined by it, instead of the other way around.
I try to be less cynical about it. Why do you think the gay romances were there for a superficial grab at profit? It didn't seem like that at all to me.Here Comes Tomorrow said:As an aside I will restate that it blows my mind that people praise EA/Bioware as a forward thinking, progressive company, when all they are doing is exploiting sexualities for profit and they're perfectly okay with that.
But I supppse thats okay because they have a "fully gay" character.
Screw it, I would even play it to cleanse my palate after all that Call of Duty, Medal of Honor jingoist or "look at my manly gun-beard-pecs" Gears of War bullshit.AT God said:Shorter response: who cares if we are ready, make the games anyway, that's how progress happens.
Captcha: rent-a-swag
Sorry, Captcha, my swag is not for rent.