Are women jealous of men?

Recommended Videos

Mozared

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1,607
0
0
Like said before, excellent topic. You make a steady point and have covered up all entrances with sandbags by stating you reaized that generalization is pointless. For as far as your point goes, that this applies to some (or even a lot of) women, I think I agree.
 

AquaAscension

New member
Sep 29, 2009
313
0
0
poncho14 said:
AquaAscension said:
Anyhow, last side thought: I believe that the movie Twilight: New Moon is the first step towards the commodotization [making a product out] of the male body. The only pictures one sees of the werewolves are the shirtless kind. The men aren't being valued for too much outside of "OMG, He iz sooooo HOT! Like, HAWT!!!!" This might sound good at first. If both men and women are commodities, then we can just buy each other and the world keeps on turning. No, fail. I think if this happens then individuality goes out the window. We become sexual objects with no real power to do anything. Now, I don't think this will actually happen, but if it does, then get ready to spend several hours a day, everyday in a gym so that you, too, can one day be valuable enough to the female mind's eye to be bought like so much gum: chewed up spit out and never used again.

(I did not read for grammar/spelling errors... apologies if there are any)
But I think what the OP was saying is that the men just shrug it off and go I don't care if they are making us look like that they will just need to live with the fact we are not like that.

This may or may not be true but I think that is what the OP is getting at.
Ha, silly goose, so to speak! That's why the beginning of that thought is labeled "Side thought." Last side thought at that. I know it has nothing to do with the Original Post/Point. Thanks.

Why do men just shrug it off though? I think that's what the question really comes down to. Come now, don't simply tell me that my thoughts are off topic when I already knew they would be by virtue of labeling it a "side thought."

Respond to my thoughts, treat me like an individual. Yes, there may be something to that idea. Just maybe.
 

PrinceoN

New member
Jun 24, 2009
249
0
0
SikOseph said:
Charisma said:
Men have had thousands of years to develop a strong gender identity. We fart, we scratch ourselves, we eat big hearty meals, we like to look at boobs, we like explosions and cool ninja fighting and stories of manliness. 300 wasn't homoerotic, it was incredibly manly. Real men staring death in the face and smiling.
No we don't. You may do, or may aspire to, and hate yourself because you don't, but we do not. Staring death in the face and laughing isn't manly, it is desparate, and if you are getting your 'gender identity' from films, and in particular cartoon films like 300 you should seriously rethink where your role models come from. Real people are not like that, and aspiring to that as your idea of manliness is embarrassing and childish, and worse, it is at least part of what is causing you to be so insecure.
because nobody has EVER looked up to people in movies and such before in their ENTIRE life. EVER.
 

Walf

New member
Dec 18, 2008
5
0
0
It's fairly obvious that this is both what was destined for this thread and what it has now come to, but I feel the need to illustrate what this has boiled down to anyway:



That is all
 

Soren91

New member
Jul 27, 2009
192
0
0
Poomanchu745 said:
Soren91 said:
I saw this and the psychologist in me began to rant.
Can you say a new Freud has been born? PENIS ENVY LAWL
That's what I was thinking. The Freud thought led to the Oedipus and Electra complexes running through my head again, like always. *shivers*
 

President Moocow

New member
Nov 18, 2009
153
0
0
The more I read the replies in this thread, the more it's apparent why nerdy guys suck at talking to or even relating to girls in any way.

AquaAscension said:
Charisma said:
*snip* I guess? I'm new at this thing...
Anyhow, last side thought: I believe that the movie Twilight: New Moon is the first step towards the commodotization [making a product out] of the male body. The only pictures one sees of the werewolves are the shirtless kind. The men aren't being valued for too much outside of "OMG, He iz sooooo HOT! Like, HAWT!!!!" This might sound good at first. If both men and women are commodities, then we can just buy each other and the world keeps on turning. No, fail. I think if this happens then individuality goes out the window. We become sexual objects with no real power to do anything. Now, I don't think this will actually happen, but if it does, then get ready to spend several hours a day, everyday in a gym so that you, too, can one day be valuable enough to the female mind's eye to be bought like so much gum: chewed up spit out and never used again.

Twilight could really be the death of the human race. If it comes to this, I want everyone to know that I echo Yahtzee in saying, "I fucking called it."
This one is one of my favorites ^ from this insane thread. So let's see, video games have used sexy girls for sex appeal in pretty much every single game that had a female character. The entire porn consists in large majority with a male audience in mind. There are a countless number of times where women are sex symbols, used to make a movie/game/advertisement better. All of this is normal.

But then movie aimed at girls is released which features sexy guys and some werewolf/vampire stuff. Suddenly guys are objectified and NOW it's the end of the world, and NOW apparently is the time for genuine concern! Basically, according to Aqua, objectifying women is perfectly natural, but once you objectify men then the end of the world is at hand! Unbelievable.

Normally I'd consider that socially ignorant, blatantly sexist by using double standards for genders, insecure and incredibly hypocritical and leave it at that. Aqua, however manages to be all of those things and do so without making the slightest bit of sense. So apparently when women are objectified and exploited for sex appeal that's normal, but once men are objectified by women then suddenly we're all doomed?
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
Soren91 said:
I saw this and the psychologist in me began to rant.
I'm in a similar boat. These days, without documented, peer reviewed evidence with statistical analysis, I tend to zone peoples arguments out. However, I will say one thing: Yes, women likely are jealous of men. Through no fault of there own, they get paid less, given less power, etc etc. That's something to be jealous of, no matter what gender you are.
 

AquaAscension

New member
Sep 29, 2009
313
0
0
President Moocow said:
The more I read the replies in this thread, the more it's apparent why nerdy guys suck at talking to or even relating to girls in any way.

AquaAscension said:
Charisma said:
*snip* I guess? I'm new at this thing...
Anyhow, last side thought: I believe that the movie Twilight: New Moon is the first step towards the commodotization [making a product out] of the male body. The only pictures one sees of the werewolves are the shirtless kind. The men aren't being valued for too much outside of "OMG, He iz sooooo HOT! Like, HAWT!!!!" This might sound good at first. If both men and women are commodities, then we can just buy each other and the world keeps on turning. No, fail. I think if this happens then individuality goes out the window. We become sexual objects with no real power to do anything. Now, I don't think this will actually happen, but if it does, then get ready to spend several hours a day, everyday in a gym so that you, too, can one day be valuable enough to the female mind's eye to be bought like so much gum: chewed up spit out and never used again.

Twilight could really be the death of the human race. If it comes to this, I want everyone to know that I echo Yahtzee in saying, "I fucking called it."
This one is one of my favorites ^ from this insane thread. So let's see, video games have used sexy girls for sex appeal in pretty much every single game that had a female character. The entire porn consists in large majority with a male audience in mind. There are a countless number of times where women are sex symbols, used to make a movie/game/advertisement better. All of this is normal.

But then movie aimed at girls is released which features sexy guys and some werewolf/vampire stuff. Suddenly guys are objectified and NOW it's the end of the world, and NOW apparently is the time for genuine concern! Basically, according to Aqua, objectifying women is perfectly natural, but once you objectify men then the end of the world is at hand! Unbelievable.

Normally I'd consider that socially ignorant, blatantly sexist by using double standards for genders, insecure and incredibly hypocritical and leave it at that. Aqua, however manages to be all of those things and do so without making the slightest bit of sense. So apparently when women are objectified and exploited for sex appeal that's normal, but once men are objectified by women then suddenly we're all doomed?
Yes, out of context, that would appear to be what I'm saying. Unfortunately, you didn't read the entire post.

My original thought was pulled from the film "Dream Worlds 3" in which a very good case is made that portrays women as wholly objectified. I said that that is a "sickening thought." I absolutely HATE the idea that ANYONE is or has been brought down to a thing; has been objectified.

I also suppose that the humor in the quoted idea is lost without the nuances of voice inflections which could have implied sarcasm.

I do see your point though. The wording of the quote seems to say that if men are objectified, then all of these bad things will happen. That's not what I meant to say. I was pretty appalled when I saw the film referenced above. Check it out, it makes a good point. Anyhow, sorry for the confusion. Good day.
 

President Moocow

New member
Nov 18, 2009
153
0
0
Ok, sorry about that. I kinda went to town on that point after seeing so many people agree with a post that makes chauvinism look conservative. My apologies, that was a bit too far. I'm still, however, pissed that everyone agrees with the insane idea that women are jealous of men for reasons I've already stated.
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,468
0
0
It sounds like to me your saying women lack a stereotype. I thought that was one of the big arguments for the feminest movement, that all they get seen as by men are sandwhich making sex toys used to have their children to continue there family line. I think it's mainly the media that makes these generalisations but the main problem is people use the media to colour their opinions, which is something I cannot stand.

The media tells people they should like this music and they do, buy this product and they do. It's like those conspiracy theorys that the government tells people what to do because they control their minds. The world would be a better place without the media, particularly the kind about celebrity gossip and pop culture.
 

Kavachi

New member
Sep 18, 2009
274
0
0
I kinda see what you mean, but I don't really agree, can't really tell what it is I don't agree with. Ah well...

And btw, you knew that you would get a crap load of feminists being all bitchy beaucuse they will never admit that they're maybe a bit jealous. Well, it put me to thought and it lol'd me a bit, so gj OP.
 

Angelus SnV

New member
Nov 19, 2009
269
0
0
No sir...absolutely not..you are gay and should be punished....

*said the guy with long hair, a girly name (Angel), who owns all four of the Twilight books and can adamantly argue on the fly topics ranging from why Jacob is cooler than Edward and why Tommy will forever be the most mighty of all the Power Rangers*


(BTW...i screwed up and hit Reply instead of Quote...that was supposed to be in refference to Ravens_nest (i think that was his name)'s comment....)
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
Women may or may not be jealous of men but I'd reckon it's a fair bet they are happy with what they are and don't want to be stereotyped the same way men are.

i.e all hammers and 300esk sword fighting
 

FluffyNeurosis

New member
Oct 22, 2009
226
0
0
I agree with you! I was in a house my senior year of college with 3 girls and 1 other guy. Any time there was a problem that involved the women we just ignored it because we quickly figured out addressing it would lead to weeks of passive aggressive behavior/bitching. Any problems I had with the guy got solved easily and directly ie. ?STOP PEEING ON THE SEAT?. Guess what no more pee!
 

traceur_

New member
Feb 19, 2009
4,181
0
0
Good post, my friend.

ravens_nest said:
Only one questioned was produced from reading that...

Can I still be a manly man and enjoy a scented bath?
No, you cannot.
 

Biosophilogical

New member
Jul 8, 2009
3,264
0
0
BonsaiK said:
Charisma said:
BonsaiK said:
Selected quotes:

Gosh, I was going to carefully deconstruct your argument, but you've provided your own counter-argument and saved me the trouble. Bless you.
You're welcome.
I'll humour you a little though.

Your post basically says "all women have no identity, except the women that have identity".

That's a bit like saying "all cats are black except the ones that are other colours". It's about as redundant as statements get.
But, a great good observant friend once said to me "Blanket statements are illogical". Well, that statemment is almost spot on, and yet, by the fact that it is a blanket statement, the only way to truly make it logical, and therefore not subject to its own connotations, was to make it "Illogical blanket statements are illogical". Sure it sounds stupid, but my point was, that the only blanket statements that make sense are the ones that only apply to those they are convicting (much like my example, it is aimed at illogical blanket statements saying they are illogical, because anything else would make the statement about blanket statements illogical in itself). So really, much like the statement about blanket statements, although it applies to most of the examples, the only way to include the exceptions to the rule was to remove the reference to the scope of the original statement.
...
...
...
Does that make sense???

OT: Of course women are jealous of men, otherwise they wouldn't have women's rights movements. If they weren't jealous of men, they wouldn't have the desire to achieve equality with us. (not a sexist comment, just an 'observation' as the OP put it)
...
...
...
 

IckleMissMayhem

New member
Oct 18, 2009
939
0
0
Charisma said:
Now try rereading my post free of assumptions and pre-formed accusations.
Why? So I can change my opinion that your OP is full of generalising, patronising crap?

Sorry, didn't happen!
 

Spitfire175

New member
Jul 1, 2009
1,373
0
0
ravens_nest said:
Only one questioned was produced from reading that...

Can I still be a manly man and enjoy a scented bath?

Apart from that, fair play...
I suppose yes. If you're confident enough to do it without having a self esteem or identity crisis, what's the problem? Or even if you did, so friggin what? The "manliest thing" to do there is to do exactly as you please.

OT: I had a good time reading that. I mostly agree, but remain somewhat sceptical.
 

Nadsat

New member
May 30, 2008
33
0
0
1. Accusing women of acting petty and confrontational in a long-winded and rambling rant about the inferiority of women done in response to a Youtube video is just a little ironic
2. Saying that you're not a woman hater doesn't mean you aren't one
3. The problem with basing your primitive sociological theories on an observational basis is that they are entirely skewed by your surroundings, and thus any claims to understanding the female gender (although I think you really mean sex) are flawed.
4. Having low self-esteem doesn't make you a 'hybrid' (or as everyone else calls it 'transgendered')
5 The crux of your argument rests on the notion that men have developed a strong gender identity. This is not true. Throughout history there have been a variety of masculine expectations that can be associated with different socio-economic classes. For example, the Victorian bourgeoisie associated manhood with being able to provide for your family, maintain respectability within society as a whole, and obey the correct social norms, Victorian working class would associate manhood with going out drinking, fighting and doing an honest day's work for an honest day's pay. There is difference between manliness as understood by a 17th century puritan and a 20th century businessman. From this we can conclude that the image of manliness is largely a result of social factors and your personal definition of manliness (drinking beer, farting, shitting, fighting, masturbating to 300) is but one of many throughout time and history. It is certainly not a continuous, unchanging definition.
6. I'm confused about your attitude towards women though. Do you think they have no identity, or their identity is in their 'natural' role as homemakers? The only constant is an undercurrent of misogyny. Basically, you're upset because women have emotions and get indignant when they're insulted. Ignoring for the moment that this is a gross exaggeration and misrepresentation of women, if you can't handle the fact that people (all people) get emotional sometimes, I suggest you limit your social interaction to your video games.
7. Thank you for your wonderful insights into the female identity crisis. I'm sure all women the world over will prostrate themselves before you in gratitude.
8. You don't sound smart. You sound like a bitter loser.