I stick to my real life personality, it's easier than trying to keep up a lie. The only difference I would say is that I'm a little bit more vocal of my opinions online (especially this site) because, odds are, my argument will be greeted with an intellectually supported answer and, thus debate, causing what I can basically describe a version of mental chess rather than simply "You're wrong. I'm right. Durr Dee Durp".
For example, if I say that I am for the death penalty, people will debate the moral ambiguity of it, the death toll of falsely accused innocents, etc, etc (usually) instead of "Well, that's just stupid". Also, the delayed amount of time gives people a better chance to come up with witty and clever responses such as this one from the "Can Killing be justified?" thread :
PsychoticForesight:
swolf:
PsychoticForesight:
blakfayt:
No, if there is a god then no matter why you killed someone you will do your turn in hell. Ending the life of another is horrid and to "justify" such an act is just an attempt to console the soul. The harsh reality is killing is killing, and those who kill, be it their job or some sick twisted reason, will burn in hell for the appropriated length of time. Cause it turns out hell isn't forever, you roast for a time, then once you have atoned, you go to heaven. (what do you know, god might not be such a dick after all.)
I'm not religious but I'd rather dine in hell than let a killer walk the earth.
Hell has got some good food actually. Sometimes I get my steak and it's a bit overcooked but, other than that, it's not that bad.
I've heard the buffet is heavenly.
...there's got to be a better way to do that than just "copy and paste".