Furburt said:
Steelfists said:
Make a good game, Mr. Turner, then I'll give a shit about your opinion.
Quoted for truth.
A man who makes a game thats is an immature 10 year olds fantasy has no right to complain about anything.
He's not really complaining about it. Instead, it seemed like he was complementing Infinity Ward for having the guts to do this. At least that's the impression I got from the article.
OT: I'm all for games pushing boundaries, but only if it serves a purpose within the game. And that's why I'm not to fond of this level. I haven't played
Modern Warfare 2, so I may be wrong when I say this. But from what I've heard from other people this level didn't have a major impact on the games story, and was unnecessary. In that case I do have a problem with them putting this into the game because then they are just trying to create controversy. It's hard to justify this scene in the game when it was only done for controversy. That just makes the entire industry look bad.
But again, I haven't actually played
Modern Warfare 2 so it might actually have a significant purpose.
Xcelsior said:
DeMoNxDaVe said:
The whole concept of the GTA is to kill innocent people and now because MW2 does it, it makes it horribly controversial?
Thank you!! I raised the exact same point a while back. Yes GTA has had its bad publicity, but with MW2 they blew it right up...also I'm getting sick of MW2 threads now, no matter how much I like the game.
It's not controversial just because your killing innocent people. The game has you play the role of a terrorist (or rather, someone pretending to be one). Considering how much fear there still is surrounding terrorism, a game having you directly mimic their actions is bound to grab some attention.
DeMoNxDaVe said:
Too controversial Matt Turner? Fuck you.
But he said it was a good thing. Why are all of you guys insulting him over this? I don't get it.