Can anyone tell me the difference between skipping gameplay and turning on God-mode? We've all done it, haven't we?
As I noted to a earlier poster in the thread most of the personal attacks only came after she saidAlternatePFG said:Despite her writing being pretty awful, there is no way she deserves these kinds of personal insults. Criticize her writing and comments, definitely, but personally attack her? That's just low.
It's not just Twitter either. A couple weeks ago I think there was a thread on Reddit with a ton of posts calling her a "fat *****" and other things along those lines. That's not legitimate criticism, that's just stupidity. You guys aren't making your point this way, you're simply showing the world how entitled and misogynistic the gaming community can be. Good job.
In response to critisism. Now I'm not saying what the people said to her after that was justified (because it isn't) but it didn't just happen out of the blue. I feel like a terrible person typing this but: The Destructoid article quoted in the OP (and several similar articles I've seen on it) is biased against the misogynists, who while horrible and disgusting did not start throwing insults with no provocation."I just figure they're jealous that I get to have both a vagina AND a games industry job, and they can't get either."
This was happening way before the Destructoid article and the comment she made. It happened right around the release of Dragon Age 2, with all the hype backlash and hate the game was getting from fans. After Hepler made a few comments that turned out to be really controversial on the forums (The ones about "Skipping Gameplay" and such, not the game industry one), some people made it their business to just start harassing her.Axolotl said:As I noted to a earlier poster in the thread most of the personal attacks only came after she saidAlternatePFG said:Despite her writing being pretty awful, there is no way she deserves these kinds of personal insults. Criticize her writing and comments, definitely, but personally attack her? That's just low.
It's not just Twitter either. A couple weeks ago I think there was a thread on Reddit with a ton of posts calling her a "fat *****" and other things along those lines. That's not legitimate criticism, that's just stupidity. You guys aren't making your point this way, you're simply showing the world how entitled and misogynistic the gaming community can be. Good job.In response to critisism. Now I'm not saying what the people said to her after that was justified (because it isn't) but it didn't just happen out of the blue. I feel like a terrible person typing this but: The Destructoid article quoted in the OP (and several similar articles I've seen on it) is biased against the misogynists, who while horrible and disgusting did not start throwing insults with no provocation."I just figure they're jealous that I get to have both a vagina AND a games industry job, and they can't get either."
Well, those people aren't really anonymous, they're on twitter ffs.Zhukov said:Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.Thatrocketeer said:That's exactly it, she presented a controversial viewpoint, controversial things often generate hate because of contradicting opinions other people have, or in this case, those gamers, and I as well have. She could have handled things better by not presenting it at all.
She knew that her opinion was controversial, she had the choice to avoid the flak, yet she didn't, did she? And those people are acting like hateful, disgusting little brats because of what she said, or rather, what she didn't do and you're saying it wasn't well deserved?
I cannot fathom this notion that a person who says something controversial deserves to be called a fat cancerous *****. She did not make those people act the way they do. Those courageous little keyboard warriors chose to do it. She is not responsible for their actions.
I guess this is just what happens when you give poisonous, cowardly little turds a mouthpiece and the protection of anonymity.
RTSVault101 said:7. that screen shot of a possible new Bioware game is from a COD style FPS with a horrile story and wrting with HORRBIEL charachters that will be worse than DA2 and ME3 combined..(no dont argue with me I KNOW this I can tell from the colour they used)
Playing through a game with god-mode on can just be another way to play the game, skipping gameplay is watching a game. And I never used god-mode, I found it boring.jezcentral said:Can anyone tell me the difference between skipping gameplay and turning on God-mode? We've all done it, haven't we?
Uh huh.Thatrocketeer said:Thing is though, she DID make those people act the way they do, controversy can cause hate, those "actions", which are nothing more than name calling, are the effect from that cause.
Oh there certainly was critisism before but most of it wasn't personal and it was on level with the stuff directed at Gaider and that button-awesome guy (I don't remember his name of the top of my head) the really nasty comment, that get the notice of the various websites commentuing on this only came about after she said that, then the really offensive stuff started getting said. And I want to be clear, I do not in any way approve of the personal insults, they're immature and a fair ammount of them crossed all sorts of lines. But waht I don't like is that it's getting spun as "poor writer attacked by misogynist gamers" since it just gives Bioware another excuse to deflect critisism and avoid any attempt at improving their games.AlternatePFG said:This was happening way before the Destructoid article and the comment she made. It happened right around the release of Dragon Age 2, with all the hype backlash and hate the game was getting from fans. After Hepler made a few comments that turned out to be really controversial on the forums (The ones about "Skipping Gameplay" and such, not the game industry one), some people made it their business to just start harassing her.
It doesn't even matter if she incited the comments anyway. Is the amount of hate she's getting proportional to that one comment in anyway? Aren't we supposed to be the bigger people and just call bullshit on the comment and move on? People claim to dislike her because she is a bad writer (Which I certainly agree with) with some questionable tastes in literature (Twilight, etc.) but instead of criticizing the writing, they just go on and on about how fat she is.
Oh, ha ha, very funny.Zhukov said:Uh huh.Thatrocketeer said:Thing is though, she DID make those people act the way they do, controversy can cause hate, those "actions", which are nothing more than name calling, are the effect from that cause.
She made them act that way? Made them? Forced them? Engineered circumstances such that they had no possible alternative but to be arseholes?
Don't those people have the ability to chose to express themselves in a civil manner or shut the fuck up the same way she could have chosen to keep her opinions to herself?
Surely by your logic I could say that the interviewer forced her to express her opinions. After all, asking questions causes answers...
*gasp*
It's all the interviewer's fault! Quick, someone find their Twitter account so I can call them a fat *****!
Well now I hate her. She destroyed my favorite character from awakening. Regardless of this however, she doesn't deserve to be subjected to verbal assault. Chastised for shitty writing? Yes. But personal insults have no place in this or any debate not centered around them.LittleBlondeGoth said:She also did Anders