I stand corrected. I forgot how long a longbowman took to train. On the other hand, crossbows were nearly as easy to operate as early firearms, didn't take a lot of upper body strength, even for the really heavy duty ones (although you needed a lot of time to crank the things).Mathurin said:Longbowmen were trained from an extremely young age, the english longbow was capable of doing what it did because of its incredible draw weight, an untrained peasant couldnt fire it.
http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/smallarms/p/englongbow.htm
Though an effective weapon, the longbow required extensive training to use effectively. To make sure that deep pool of archers always existed in England, the population, both rich and poor, were encouraged to hone their skills. This was furthered by the government through edicts such King Edward I's ban on sports on Sunday which was designed to ensure that his people practiced archery. As the draw force on the longbow was a hefty 160–180 lbf, archers in training worked their way up to the weapon. The level of training required to be an effective archer discouraged other nations from adopting the weapon.
Modern bows top out around 50-75lbs
You call a five foot long hunk of wood easy to conceal?
As to concealing the bow, once unstrung (which is rather untrivial, I know) it is easily hidden among an innocuous bundle of firewood.