Bribe away... (not that they're particularly expensive) and killing officials is easy (if they ever appear). Played once without ever needing to play that stupid shoe-horned minigame (except the tutorial one).GundamSentinel said:Hmm, now I might just have to finish Revelations after all (retarded tower defense games...).
True, but it's the fact that it was there in the first place that bothered me. It's insulting that Ubisoft would resort to tower defense games in such a huge title.SckizoBoy said:Bribe away... (not that they're particularly expensive) and killing officials is easy (if they ever appear). Played once without ever needing to play that stupid shoe-horned minigame (except the tutorial one).GundamSentinel said:Hmm, now I might just have to finish Revelations after all (retarded tower defense games...).
When I first heard about it, I wasn't that bothered, to be honest, since I hadn't had much exposure to tower defence games (which I had a naturally ambivalent attitude towards...) but fuck me, when I played it the rage just grew... the criticisms I have for its execution (not inclusion, mind) in AC:R are innumerable. It was just... so... unbelievably... ... ... shit. And I'm a trophy hunter, and that was the one I just could not be arsed to get.GundamSentinel said:True, but it's the fact that it was there in the first place that bothered me. It's insulting that Ubisoft would resort to tower defense games in such a huge title.
LOL. Really?SckizoBoy said:When I first heard about it, I wasn't that bothered, to be honest, since I hadn't had much exposure to tower defence games (which I had a naturally ambivalent attitude towards...) but fuck me, when I played it the rage just grew... the criticisms I have for its execution (not inclusion, mind) in AC:R are innumerable. It was just... so... unbelievably... ... ... shit. And I'm a trophy hunter, and that was the one I just could not be arsed to get.GundamSentinel said:True, but it's the fact that it was there in the first place that bothered me. It's insulting that Ubisoft would resort to tower defense games in such a huge title.
Just because he had an apple doesn't mean that he is a templar. Gandhi had an apple but was killed by the templars in order to retrive it if I recall correctly. He could in fact be an assassin that believed in order to defeat the Britsh, who I'm pretty sure are controled by the templars at this time. Also the MC could be working with George, who was part of the freemasons. Also at this time there were two different groups of Freemasons and George could have been working with one and the Assassin decided that George's side was the better one.DrunkDonut said:Man for some reason I was reminded of skyrim when saw them screenshot but slightly confused thought George Washington was a templer ? so why the assasin talking to him