So, only giant tits can get on telly in Aus?
What if guys don't like tits that knock over tables?
What if guys don't like tits that knock over tables?
Australia bans small breasts
- Thread starter Killjoi
- Start date
Recommended Videos
The more I read on the weird laws being pushed through in Australia, the more I realize the US really isn't that bad off.
It's interesting too, there is no way things like this ban or those video game bans or whatever would go over in the US without a huge outcry.
Also just adding to the small boobs discussion, I like pretty much any size of 'em, small ones are just cute I guess (you won't catch me saying this in public in a million years), and I shouldn't have to explain big ones.
It's interesting too, there is no way things like this ban or those video game bans or whatever would go over in the US without a huge outcry.
Also just adding to the small boobs discussion, I like pretty much any size of 'em, small ones are just cute I guess (you won't catch me saying this in public in a million years), and I shouldn't have to explain big ones.
I must say how economically chauvinistic and shallow this law really is. These people on the Board seem to forget that there are perfectly old enough adults with small breasts. In terms of result, it basically outlaws all women with less than an E cup from having a whole career of their choice.
Yes, how dare they choose to be in the porno industry! What if they want to? Some people would make the sacrifice for money or else not even view it as a sacrifice, and that should be their right, and judging them on that basis is nothing more than criticism based in the Victorian Age of thought.
While the industry is definitely ugly as it is no matter where you go, that shouldn't stop people from having the free will to enter it. Not to mention, what will this do to all the models who meet these classifications, and have been doing this for years, making them dependant on this line of work for their livelihood? What if, after they lose their source of income, they remain saddled with children and government support doesn't cover them fully for myriad reasons? "Just live with it" is no doubt the slogan of these merciless censors.
The other new ruling, about the refusal of classification for women ejaculating, is also rather sexist. So men can? How odd. Not to mention, this sort of "mental shield" ruling will just make sexual repression and therefore all the twisted perversions that come from it more and more common. The ideological persuasion that demonises sexual expression over chastity does not come from a psychologically or sociologically informed frame of mind, and must be toppled if the consequences of such legislation are to be fairly assessed.
Unfortunately, this sort of thing will probably be very difficult to fight with in Australia, with both the major parties in a rather conservative frame of mind under Rudd and Abbott. The Australian Sex Party is, I think, right in opposing these bans, even if its reasons for doing so may differ from mine. I wonder how the Greens will handle the news, and if it will get a comment or not. Let us hope that they agree with the ASP here, to bolster support. There are several types of feminism that run in both parties, but I think that ultimately, it is the economic one that largely defines the condition of the others, and that therefore it should receive priority.
Yes, how dare they choose to be in the porno industry! What if they want to? Some people would make the sacrifice for money or else not even view it as a sacrifice, and that should be their right, and judging them on that basis is nothing more than criticism based in the Victorian Age of thought.
While the industry is definitely ugly as it is no matter where you go, that shouldn't stop people from having the free will to enter it. Not to mention, what will this do to all the models who meet these classifications, and have been doing this for years, making them dependant on this line of work for their livelihood? What if, after they lose their source of income, they remain saddled with children and government support doesn't cover them fully for myriad reasons? "Just live with it" is no doubt the slogan of these merciless censors.
The other new ruling, about the refusal of classification for women ejaculating, is also rather sexist. So men can? How odd. Not to mention, this sort of "mental shield" ruling will just make sexual repression and therefore all the twisted perversions that come from it more and more common. The ideological persuasion that demonises sexual expression over chastity does not come from a psychologically or sociologically informed frame of mind, and must be toppled if the consequences of such legislation are to be fairly assessed.
Unfortunately, this sort of thing will probably be very difficult to fight with in Australia, with both the major parties in a rather conservative frame of mind under Rudd and Abbott. The Australian Sex Party is, I think, right in opposing these bans, even if its reasons for doing so may differ from mine. I wonder how the Greens will handle the news, and if it will get a comment or not. Let us hope that they agree with the ASP here, to bolster support. There are several types of feminism that run in both parties, but I think that ultimately, it is the economic one that largely defines the condition of the others, and that therefore it should receive priority.
There are more right-wing, anti-expression people in Australia than just Atkinson. (And in any case, he is more against violence in media than sex.) In that sexually repressed sense, our government's rather like that of the United States, actually.Macgyvercas said:
I am afraid, sir, that you have been wildly misinformed.Hopeless Bastard said:
Gender reassignment surgery is a legitimate treatment for Gender Dysphoria.
Fat deposits around your shoulders and hips can be redistributed with hormones.
Hair can be removed with electrolysis.
The Adam's apple can be removed with a simple surgical procedure.
There's really nothing you can do about the hairline.
And please, female ejaculation is uncommon, but definitely a very real phenomenon. Take it from someone who has experienced it first hand.
They do realize that that sounds like misogynistic bullshit...
And I know plenty of girls that are in their THIRTIES with small cups... the ignorance and stupidity of it all... Damn.
And I know plenty of girls that are in their THIRTIES with small cups... the ignorance and stupidity of it all... Damn.
Yeah, that is one way to help girls not fall into the size 0 waste size double z boobs that the media is saying they need to have...
Personally, I'm one of those weird people that doesn't really react to boobs with a "omgz!" or something like that. Honestly, I don't really find them that appealing (naked), but smaller ones look better then larger.
Personally, I'm one of those weird people that doesn't really react to boobs with a "omgz!" or something like that. Honestly, I don't really find them that appealing (naked), but smaller ones look better then larger.
Australia... it's trying to appear without anything offensive, which is appaling
seriously, appreciating small breasts is seen as a sign of paedophilia? that's so obtuse, the Australian government should be ashamed of itself...
also saying that a man's semen is okay while a woman's ejaculation is not shows another sign of repressed sexism
you know the Aussies best course of action here:
pick up Guy Fawkes mask
seriously, appreciating small breasts is seen as a sign of paedophilia? that's so obtuse, the Australian government should be ashamed of itself...
also saying that a man's semen is okay while a woman's ejaculation is not shows another sign of repressed sexism
you know the Aussies best course of action here:
pick up Guy Fawkes mask
Wrong, from what I've heard, that's already gone through! Now we're just waiting for them to take away all vestiges of freedom!Endocrom said:
It was called the 60s. The psychology I've heard is this fascination with big breasts is a result of living in a world percieved as threatening. So blame terrorism, or the assholes who made their policy out of it.faceless chick said:
Actually now I think about it, this paranoia about pedophiles is probably part of this cause.
I don't think this has anything to do with "protecting the children." It has everything to do with discriminating against small breasted women. Promoting medium and large breasts might result in an increase in average breast size in the population... think about it.
