Avatar Becomes Highest-Grossing Film Ever

Recommended Videos

rossatdi

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,542
0
0
Sulu said:
rossatdi said:
Yeah, well its got nothing on the Dark Knight in terms of acting, script, character and ... well basically everything except visual effects.

The world's become a population of graphics whores!
I thought people only watched Dark Knight cos the joker died and batman had a sore throat?
I'm pretty sure people are only seeing Avatar because 'OMG, pretty!'
 

DuplicateValue

New member
Jun 25, 2009
3,748
0
0
rossatdi said:
DuplicateValue said:
The Dark Knight wasn't actually that good a movie. If it wasn't for Heath Ledger's performance, the movie wouldn't be as undeservedly popular as it is.
Wow, really? That's actually an opinion people manage to have? That's just jaw droppingly bizarre. I'm normally pretty good and seeing the other side of an argument but can't see, just can't see it here.
Sorry, I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. Are you?
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
It was a good movie, it sucked me in.

But the standard to which all James Cameron Films should be measured is Aliens and Terminator 2.

And despite my enjoyment of Avatar, I still think that District 9 was the best Sci Fi movie in recent history.
 

Jon Etheridge

Appsro Animation
Apr 28, 2009
1,384
0
0
I really enjoyed the movie. Yes, at times it was a bit cliche but the world that they managed to create kept me enthralled through the entire 3 hours. So yeah I think it can be argued that while the script could use some work the visual reality they managed to create is unlike anything anyone has ever seen. Especially in 3D.

I think you can say that this movie is the Star Wars of its time. Think about it, Star Wars' plot was something that had been done before, but it was presented in a way that managed to suck people in and make them care about the characters and the world they live in. I'm sure someone could write a book on comparisons but the point is that Cameron managed to tell a story and create a world that captured the imaginations of millions of people just like A New Hope did back in 1977.

The rumor is that Cameron has 2 sequels planned. If the story tightens up a bit, not only can I enjoy an eyegasm but I can also connect with the characters a bit more. Here's hoping Avatar 2 will be the comparable to The Empire Strikes Back. :)
 

rossatdi

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,542
0
0
DuplicateValue said:
rossatdi said:
DuplicateValue said:
The Dark Knight wasn't actually that good a movie. If it wasn't for Heath Ledger's performance, the movie wouldn't be as undeservedly popular as it is.
Wow, really? That's actually an opinion people manage to have? That's just jaw droppingly bizarre. I'm normally pretty good and seeing the other side of an argument but can't see, just can't see it here.
Sorry, I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. Are you?
Not really. I just don't get how you can not rate The Dark Knight as far as big budget action blockbusters I can't think of anything even in the same league since the classics (Predator, Aliens, Terminator 2, Die Hard, Rambo, Fifth Element, The Matrix).
 

SharedProphet

New member
Oct 9, 2008
181
0
0
John Funk said:
This is, of course, not without caveats: Unlike Avatar, Titanic was never shown on more-expensive IMAX screens, and is still winning on the number of tickets sold. Furthermore, these numbers are completely unadjusted for inflation - if we take currency differences into account, Avatar is only #26 on the top-grossing films of all time, while Titanic is up at #6. Adjusted for inflation, the number one film is still Gone With the Wind.
Am I the only person who finds this part hilarious? "Congratulations, James Cameron, for inflation."

Without adjusting for inflation, you're comparing apples and oranges. But by all means, the creators of the newest marginally popular tween movie in 2018 should be happy to pat themselves on the back for beating Titanic's box-office earnings.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Something I noticed about Avatar. Jake Sully causes more damage than he fixes.
Think about it, he turned a peaceful race into warriors, managed to get two clan leaders killed in a matter of days, and caused the destruction of Hometree. As proven later in the movie, Navi arrows can penetrate the chopper's cockpits, but instead of letting the Navi get to their banshees, he tells them to run, ruining any chance of a counterrattack coming in time.

The only reason the Navi won was because the bloody tree decided "Fuck it, this guy doesn't know what hes doing" and sent an army of dinosaurs to kill everything.
 

The_ModeRazor

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,837
0
0
Didn't see it, hate the cinema.

Unless you go in slightly boozed, but then any film is enjoyable to an extent.
 

rossatdi

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,542
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
And despite my enjoyment of Avatar, I still think that District 9 was the best Sci Fi movie in recent history.
Definitely in the last 12 months. I'd go with Sunshine for last couple of years though. I came out of the cinema with sunburn, swear to god.
 

DuplicateValue

New member
Jun 25, 2009
3,748
0
0
rossatdi said:
DuplicateValue said:
rossatdi said:
DuplicateValue said:
The Dark Knight wasn't actually that good a movie. If it wasn't for Heath Ledger's performance, the movie wouldn't be as undeservedly popular as it is.
Wow, really? That's actually an opinion people manage to have? That's just jaw droppingly bizarre. I'm normally pretty good and seeing the other side of an argument but can't see, just can't see it here.
Sorry, I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. Are you?
Not really. I just don't get how you can not rate The Dark Knight as far as big budget action blockbusters I can't think of anything even in the same league since the classics (Predator, Aliens, Terminator 2, Die Hard, Rambo, Fifth Element, The Matrix).
Ah, I think the problem (if you can call it that) lies in my taste. I didn't like any of of the movies you just mentioned (well, Aliens was good enough).
 

rossatdi

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,542
0
0
DuplicateValue said:
rossatdi said:
DuplicateValue said:
rossatdi said:
DuplicateValue said:
The Dark Knight wasn't actually that good a movie. If it wasn't for Heath Ledger's performance, the movie wouldn't be as undeservedly popular as it is.
Wow, really? That's actually an opinion people manage to have? That's just jaw droppingly bizarre. I'm normally pretty good and seeing the other side of an argument but can't see, just can't see it here.
Sorry, I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. Are you?
Not really. I just don't get how you can not rate The Dark Knight as far as big budget action blockbusters I can't think of anything even in the same league since the classics (Predator, Aliens, Terminator 2, Die Hard, Rambo, Fifth Element, The Matrix).
Ah, I think the problem (if you can call it that) lies in my taste. I didn't like any of of the movies you just mentioned (well, Aliens was good enough).
.........
Wha? ... Don't ... like ... Die Hard? ... Or Predator? ... Seriously?
 

CaptainCrunch

Imp-imation Department
Jul 21, 2008
711
0
0
John Funk said:
The world of Pandora is easily the most fleshed-out fictional environment ever created for a film. The sheer level of detail in the movie makes Batman cry.
What about all the other science fiction that came before Avatar, like, Star Wars / Trek, Dune, 2001, etc?

Clearly they were nowhere near as fleshed-out as cat people flying pterodactyls...
 

Plurralbles

New member
Jan 12, 2010
4,611
0
0
Well, for a movie that rested on the shoulders of women and men who just wanted to see the actress naked, and had a plot that everyone knew teh ending to, Titanic did pretty damn well for itself.

Notice how both caused people to say, "went on too long" though. I find that pretty funny.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
CaptainCrunch said:
John Funk said:
The world of Pandora is easily the most fleshed-out fictional environment ever created for a film. The sheer level of detail in the movie makes Batman cry.
What about all the other science fiction that came before Avatar, like, Star Wars / Trek, Dune, 2001, etc?

Clearly they were nowhere near as fleshed-out as cat people flying pterodactyls...
I didn't know Star Trek, 2001 and Dune were created for films! Gee, I thought they had TV shows and books first... wow, is my face red.

:p
 

messy

New member
Dec 3, 2008
2,057
0
0
John Funk said:
the sci-fi/fantasy epic will likely pass the disaster/romance film's high-water mark
I can't be the only to notice the irony (I think irony is the right word to use here, I'm sure some kind soul will enlighten me if I'm wrong) of that line ^

OT; Pretty damn good for Cameron, I suppose it was worth the wait (for him atleast)
 

electric_warrior

New member
Oct 5, 2008
1,721
0
0
And james cameron buys himself another oscar. It's a good film, but special effects can only improve a film by so much
 

cleverlymadeup

New member
Mar 7, 2008
5,256
0
0
John Funk said:
Eagle Est1986 said:
A great way for the film industry to start a new decade. A new standard by which all things shall be measured.

Still don't know how Titanic ever had that record anyways, it was good but not that good. mind you, Avatar isn't the greatest movie ever either so there we have it.
23-year-old Leonardo DiCaprio. That's how.

for some odd reason i can see Funk adding "he's so dreamy" in his mind or at least mouthing it after he wrote that.
 

Bagaloo

New member
Sep 17, 2008
788
0
0
Well deserved I feel, it was a great movie.

Though I think we are starting to see the usual backlash emerging of people hating it because it's popular.
 

Newtilator

New member
Sep 16, 2009
99
0
0
Drakenforge said:
I guess when we think of Dark Knight we don't think of the dark knights terrible acting now do we?

Ha. Avatar is better. Awesome film.
Terrible acting... Dark Knight.. EH?
Well, this is somewhat obvious. I still think Aliens is Camerons best film.