Well you are dense. Not only don't you understand the differences between Bush and Obama (One is Pro-life, the other is Pro-Choice. One supports the "Don't Ask, Don't tell" policy, the other plans on getting rid of it. One gives G-bay detaniees no rights, the other gives them many).Rooster Cogburn said:You can disagree without insulting me. I do not think "the country would go to shit." I think we'd be fine.CoziestPigeon said:Man, words can't even describe how dense you must be. Sure, he technically could do that, but then the country would go to shit. No land can deal with that many changes all at once, with no plans of action. Think a little first next time okay?Rooster Cogburn said:Thing is, he could snap his fingers and make it all better. Since Truman, the president has literally unlimited war powers.CoziestPigeon said:Hey OP, you know he can't just snap his fingers and magically make it all better right? This is the first step to closing that place down for good. Besides, look at all the other good shit he's been doing. He has ALOT of stuff to fix, he can't do it all at once.
Obama=Bush. They agree on virtually every issue. But Obama is not the problem. Nor Bush. The American people are invested in a system that not only doesn't benefit them, but ultimately has little to do with them. We should look back to our Founding Fathers. We should abolish the Federal government (which is not at all federal) and restore rule by the people. We should start from scratch and rebuild the republic. I do not think Washington can be salvaged at this point.
And besides, in general the masses are idiots. I sure as hell wouldn't want the majority of any population to control nuclear weapons. Hell even in the beginning the people didn't rule, the picked a single person to lead them.