he said most not allAxelMiller said:Im pretty sure there is plenty of swedes here.Nomad said:but since most of you aren't swedes.
The body mass index is one of the biggest examples of widely accepted pseudo-science in the history of medicine-I'm amazed that qualified doctors still pay attention to it-its an appalling example of arbitrary nonsense. I'd encourage anyone to pay no attention to it whatsoever, I mean, just have a look at the thinking behind it...Amnestic said:Doesn't BMI generally fail to account for musclemass?Nomad said:I agree, it'd be more logical for them to go with BMI or something if they have to regulate it.Amnestic said:Foolish. People are different heights and thus different builds. Sliding scale depending on height>>>Set figures across the board.
I just measured my waist for comparison, and I'm at 70 cm. And I'm so thin that the doctors scold me every time I'm doing a health checkup because I don't eat enough.
It costs you time.Amnestic said:You know what's an awesome way for people to lose weight? Jogging. Guess what it costs you? A kick in the arse out the doorway, that's what.Spaceman_Spiff said:It just seems like a tax that will only increase the overall rich/poor divide.
You're talking about Japenese people though, they aren't known for having a massive size.OniKon said:which begs the question. if ones pelvic structure is too large to physically allow such a waistline are they exempt or do they have to undergo re constructive surgery. personally I think the media are making up laws again. like they did with that "curvy cucumbers" banquiet_samurai said:Chrissyluky said:indeed we should. also why are the females allowed to be fatter? And do pregnant women have to obey this law?quiet_samurai said:Lol good!
We should adopt that in America for a year... somebody call Obama.
Probably becaue it makes their boobs bigger......?
No, women already have wider hips and waists to begin with anyways.
if the whole south left, i wouldnt miss themejb626 said:Ths thread made me laugh and I haven't read the article yet but the first image it gave me was a fat guy being dragged out his house by a SWAT team with half of a hoagie still in his mouth
OK now I'll read the article so I can give some informed input
I don't know seems a little...facist
OK I guess thats a little extreme but still I guess they don't want to end up like America which really annoys me because every nation has fat people yet only we're poked fun of for it due to statitics and where I live I don't see any fat people you know if Texas seceeded from America then the obesity rate would take a nosedive
Lulz is laughter at someone else's expenseTheNumber1Zero said:Didn't think about that. It's a terrible law that should be dropped immediatlyCanton said:I'm skeptical. They're talking about the land of sumo wretlers here.That's the last Bloody straw, what the Bloody 'Ell does Lulz mean?!imahobbit4062 said:I think I can speak for pretty much everyone on these forums when I say.
Lulz. That is all.
Considering the ilium of the pelvic girdle tends to be a fair bit more flaired for women than for men, it seems to make sense.HUBILUB said:The measurement is larger for women?
No. No you're not.IncindiaryPickle said:Am I the only one that thinks this has harsh fascist undertones?
They're japanese. they can design, build, test and manufacture trains in a blink. They just replace them. also JUST 80 MORENeonbob said:Hah!
That's hilarious.
I suppose they had to make sure it was still possible to cram tons of people in a train somehow.
I suppose it's a bit overzealous, but I can't really say it's anything but comedy to me.
Wait, what? That accounts for 101% of the population.Amnestic said:The U.S. is 67%~ overweight and 34%~ obese. Could probably do with cutting back.
That's exactly what I thought when I saw this thread.Neonbob said:I suppose they had to make sure it was still possible to cram tons of people in a train somehow.