Books you hate and books you wish they were never made.

Recommended Videos

Chased

New member
Sep 17, 2010
830
0
0
DJDarque said:
People aren't going to like what I have to say, but you asked.

The Lord of the Rings

The books that "defined" high fantasy. Tolkien created a format that no one has any balls to deviate from. It seems that every fantasy author (generalization, I know) just accepts the world he created as a rule for high fantasy. Everywhere it's elves, humans and orcs. Hardly ever do I see anyone try anything different. I spent so long trying to look for gems in the sea of Lord of the Rings clones that I gave up. Everyone tries to emulate it. Tolkien is the reason I can't read high fantasy anymore.

Hate me all you want. It's my opinion and you're not going to change it.
If you don't like elves, warlocks and dragons then why read high fantasy to begin with? Tolkien pretty much created high fantasy, of course other high fantasy books are going to be similar to Tolkien, its the same genre.

I don't fully understand what your saying, it's like hating ice cream but continually eating new kinds of it to see if it will all of a sudden taste totally different.
 
Mar 29, 2008
361
0
0
Dhalgren by Samuel R. Delaney, both this book was horrible and should not have ever existed (nor should it have won awards). The story initiates some fairly interesting riddles/plot concepts and uses some pretty great descriptions of the bleak city it takes place in, wait did he just use the same description a second, third, nth time?. Then about halfway through the nine hundred or so page novel it goes to the main character criticizing the writing of his journal that he started off strong, lost focus on the story and has no idea where to go with it, that he keeps reusing the same descriptions and can't come up with anything new to say, that he doesn't care about the characters in his story, etc. After a few hundred pages of this he ends the book by casually tossing out all the previous character development and side characters and shows that he was trolling the readers by reminding the reader of a major plot mystery and having the main character "solve" an unrelated mirror version of it for a character you had seen twice and have no reason to care about, nor was that character wondering about the solved non-mystery, a few more lines about how nothing in the last nine hundred pages amounts to anything, and then pretty much: good day, thanks for buying my book suckers. -Sammy.
 

Kahunaburger

New member
May 6, 2011
4,141
0
0
Yeah, Protocols of the Elders of Zion is easily the book that I would erase from history as well.

Chased said:
DJDarque said:
People aren't going to like what I have to say, but you asked.

The Lord of the Rings

The books that "defined" high fantasy. Tolkien created a format that no one has any balls to deviate from. It seems that every fantasy author (generalization, I know) just accepts the world he created as a rule for high fantasy. Everywhere it's elves, humans and orcs. Hardly ever do I see anyone try anything different. I spent so long trying to look for gems in the sea of Lord of the Rings clones that I gave up. Everyone tries to emulate it. Tolkien is the reason I can't read high fantasy anymore.

Hate me all you want. It's my opinion and you're not going to change it.
If you don't like elves, warlocks and dragons then why read high fantasy to begin with? Tolkien pretty much created high fantasy, of course other high fantasy books are going to be similar to Tolkien, its the same genre.

I don't fully understand what your saying, it's like hating ice cream but continually eating new kinds of it to see if it will all of a sudden taste totally different.
I would personally keep LotR, but hate all the imitators (Eragon, I'm looking at you) with the exception of stuff that intelligently uses high fantasy genre conventions like The Last Wish and arguably Discworld-ish stuff. The fantasy genre has a lot more interesting stuff than Humans+Elves+Dwarves vs. Orcs - Perdido Street Station, Dying Earth, Latro, etc.
 

GiantRaven

New member
Dec 5, 2010
2,423
0
0
Chased said:
I don't fully understand what your saying, it's like hating ice cream but continually eating new kinds of it to see if it will all of a sudden taste totally different.
I think he's saying it's the fantasy equivalent of all FPS trying to emulate Call of Duty.
 

nukethetuna

New member
Nov 8, 2010
542
0
0
OOOOH TWILIGHT OOOOOOG.

In seriousness, most of the vast number of novels that come based of video games and tie up loose ends that didn't need to be tied up, or at the very least didn't need to be tied up outside the game in a book that most players simply won't read.
 

Cavan

New member
Jan 17, 2011
486
0
0
tuddy said:
jck4332 said:
Of mice and men.

So that people don't get overly confident with themselves when they can simply overanalyse a book and think they are geniuses.
I'd have to agree with this one. Of Mice and Men is not deep and meaningful by any stretch of the words, and every time some pseudo-intellectual douchebag says otherwise, God kills a kitten.

Furthermore, I'd have to agree with another general consensus - Catcher in the Rye is another book subject to over-analysis by pseudo-intellectual kids with nothing better to do. Bear in mind, I have nothing wrong with the books themselves- they're decent enough stories. I just kinda wish they didn't exist because people have this tendency of assuming the fact they're "classic literature" implies some form of deep and meaningful story.
self edit: excessively grouchy first response

morale of the story is that thinking or feeling something about something cannot be immediately dismissed as nothing, the meaning may not be intentional but if you can find depth in something that is fine. Depth, perception and quality are subjective, you go down a slippery slope if you start telling others their ideas are flat out wrong and have no meaning.

also most of those books are things people are FORCED to read at school and taught to do exactly that about those books.
 

Rekrul

New member
Nov 24, 2010
107
0
0
I had to read to kill a mockingbird for GCSE English, and I hated it! I found it really boring, and having to study it meant having all its messages rammed down my throat. Also I don't if its because I'm young, British or just ignorance, but I really didn't "get it" or connect to it in anyway.
 

Fiz_The_Toaster

books, Books, BOOKS
Legacy
Jan 19, 2011
5,498
1
3
Country
United States
Grapes of Wrath, I hated that book when I had to read it.

Of Mice and Men, I'm convinced that Steinbeck wrote it and wants it to be used as a form of torture.
 

SlasherX

New member
Jul 8, 2009
362
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
I am amazed no one has said the bible in books that should have never been made, considering how toxic the escapist is.

Anyway, my vote is for twilight never being made.
So we ar toxic because.............................We are predominately atheist that make sense.

OH WAIT

But yeah Twilight sucks a big dick.
 

bad rider

The prodigal son of a goat boy
Dec 23, 2007
2,252
0
0
DJDarque said:
People aren't going to like what I have to say, but you asked.

The Lord of the Rings

The books that "defined" high fantasy. Tolkien created a format that no one has any balls to deviate from. It seems that every fantasy author (generalization, I know) just accepts the world he created as a rule for high fantasy. Everywhere it's elves, humans and orcs. Hardly ever do I see anyone try anything different. I spent so long trying to look for gems in the sea of Lord of the Rings clones that I gave up. Everyone tries to emulate it. Tolkien is the reason I can't read high fantasy anymore.

Hate me all you want. It's my opinion and you're not going to change it.
No hate... but (yes that but, was inevitable)Tolkien robbed Beowolf for those ideas. Blame ancient Norse people, no-one minds what you say about Denmark.
 

trollnystan

I'm back, baby, & still dancing!
Dec 27, 2010
1,281
0
0
That I've personally read?

There are probably a lot of them, but right of the top of my head I HATE The Dwarf by Pär Lagerkvist. Had to read it TWICE for school. Ugh.

And the books I wish had never been written are any books by David Eddings after the Elenium trilogy. Yes I enjoyed the Elenium, sue me. But the rest were awful. And he admitted to essentially writing the same book over and over because "it sells". I'm glad I borrowed The Elder Gods at the library instead of buying it because it was awful. AWFUL.

There are probably better suited books to be on that list but can't think of any right now.
 

Mr Somewhere

New member
Mar 9, 2011
455
0
0
What is with this seriously harmful line of thought? Why should the book be destroyed? Because you dislike, sorry "hate" it? So? Others can enjoy it, subjectivity, people (personal taste too).
Also why all the "hate" on fiction these days? Sure, you may dislike a work, but Christ, it's not like Twilight murdered your parents...
Also, as for my usual answer to these threads, I have never "hated" a piece of fictional work. I have disagreements, or, I may find a work off-putting or weak. But I've never taken personal offense against something.
 

Fenra

New member
Sep 17, 2008
643
0
0
I'd hardly say I hate them, they were all a relativly enjoyable read though nothing earth shatteringly amazing and not that memorable (just my opinion though i stress, i respect if people think opposite to me), but my vote goes for the Harry Potter series.

Less because of the books themselves but from everything else that spawned up because of it. mediocre films, crazy fanbase, a bloomin' theme park (or at least section of one in universal studios florida) etc etc. Its all just became a little too much
 

StellarViking

New member
Apr 10, 2011
541
0
0
I would have to go and say the Halo novels. I liked the games and all, and I had a friend that swore they were the best books he's read in a long time, and I just couldn't get through the first one. I hated it.