Yeah, I have to admit you are objectively correct.NeutralDrow said:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I think my answer is objectively better than anyone else's will be.
Yeah, I have to admit you are objectively correct.NeutralDrow said:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I think my answer is objectively better than anyone else's will be.
whats wrong with Mein Kampf, its an imspiring story on how one man really can change the worldLa Barata said:Anything by Margaret Atwood. Also, Mein Kampf.
I agree that its completely stupid when douches over analyze it, but its still a great and sad story and i got all choked up at the end.jck4332 said:Of mice and men.
So that people don't get overly confident with themselves when they can simply overanalyse a book and think they are geniuses.
This, more than any of the books I'm going to mention. Being a Library staff I can't stand to see a book destroyed, but that's probably the only book I would advocate burning. Same for any book where it can be proven that it is created under false pretenses and completely untrue to paint a certain religious or political group as evil.NeutralDrow said:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I think my answer is objectively better than anyone else's will be.
Try Low fantasy then. (for example Witcher series)DJDarque said:People aren't going to like what I have to say, but you asked.
The Lord of the Rings
The books that "defined" high fantasy. Tolkien created a format that no one has any balls to deviate from. It seems that every fantasy author (generalization, I know) just accepts the world he created as a rule for high fantasy. Everywhere it's elves, humans and orcs. Hardly ever do I see anyone try anything different. I spent so long trying to look for gems in the sea of Lord of the Rings clones that I gave up. Everyone tries to emulate it. Tolkien is the reason I can't read high fantasy anymore.
Hate me all you want. It's my opinion and you're not going to change it.
I REALLY hope you're being sarcastic, wammnebu.wammnebu said:whats wrong with Mein Kampf, its an imspiring story on how one man really can change the worldLa Barata said:Anything by Margaret Atwood. Also, Mein Kampf.
I read a lot of fantasy, and books that follow the Elves, Humans and Orcs stereotype are actually remarkably rare. Eragon is really the only one I can think of off the top of my head. The thing that perpetuates this stereotype is RPGs, not books. Try Brandon Sanderson's mistborn trilogy or Brent Weeks' night angel trilogy. Both are great and have neither Orc nor Elf to be seen.DJDarque said:People aren't going to like what I have to say, but you asked.
The Lord of the Rings
The books that "defined" high fantasy. Tolkien created a format that no one has any balls to deviate from. It seems that every fantasy author (generalization, I know) just accepts the world he created as a rule for high fantasy. Everywhere it's elves, humans and orcs. Hardly ever do I see anyone try anything different. I spent so long trying to look for gems in the sea of Lord of the Rings clones that I gave up. Everyone tries to emulate it. Tolkien is the reason I can't read high fantasy anymore.
Hate me all you want. It's my opinion and you're not going to change it.
That's justa piece of pulp, and its influence is minimal. give it ten years, and it's gone.Klitch said:I'm disappointed, 5 posts in and nobody has said Twilight yet.
Aw I'm reading those books at the moment. I enjoy reading them too. I don't find the writing that bad, and it makes me chuckle at some points. Which one did you read?Alex Cowan said:The 'Cherub' novels. All of them.
They're the only books I've ever ragequit because the writing was so bad.
wammnebu said:whats wrong with Mein Kampf, its an imspiring story on how one man really can change the worldLa Barata said:Anything by Margaret Atwood. Also, Mein Kampf.
This definitely, if a book is used in a school curriculum, you can guarantee it's going to make you want to staple your eyelids shut. Such an atrociously simplistic and soulless book.jck4332 said:Of mice and men.
So that people don't get overly confident with themselves when they can simply overanalyse a book and think they are geniuses.