British sniper kills 2 insurgents from a mile and half away

Recommended Videos

HotFezz8

New member
Nov 1, 2009
1,139
0
0
to hit a target at that range you have to take into account wind resistance, bullet drop, wind speed, direction.

the last record i heard about was a canadian sniper making a 2,500 metre kill with a .50 cal round. if my memory serves the bullet dropper 150 feet during its flight.
 

HotFezz8

New member
Nov 1, 2009
1,139
0
0
bloody hell he had a busy week after wards! a gunshot wound and a landmine breaking both his arms!!! fucking hell!
 

Nevyrmoore

New member
Aug 13, 2009
783
0
0
Tekkawarrior said:
Kortney said:
Tekkawarrior said:
Skill is required that's not up for discussion,

However,

1) Technology is available
-so this is really not that impressive-
2) No visible muzzle flash
3) No shot sound
-Will allow plenty of trial and error shots-

i mean kudos to the shooter, but that doesn't make him the best sniper.
You're forgetting the fact he is most likely one of the best shooters in the UK to begin with. To even make it as a military sniper speciailist you have to be outstanding.

And as others have pointed out, there was no trial and error. This guy is an outstanding shot
just read some more about the shot, i have to say i am now impressed, the guy did it with an AWM using conventional ammo, i take it back, i am impressed indeed.


no trial and error my ass: "Harrison reported it took about nine shots for him and his spotter to initially range the target successfully. Then, he reported, his first shot ?on target? was a killing shot.[7]"
"Trial and error" usually indicates actually trying to hit the target. Those first nine shots weren't actually aimed at the target, and were only to calculate both the range and how he should adjust the rifle/sight.
 

BooBooKittyFuck

New member
Sep 29, 2009
6
0
0
DividedUnity said:
Pretty god damn amazing. The second terrorist must be quite stupid. If i saw my friend get shot without even hearing or seeing where it came from i wouldnt get straight up and stand where he just was.
He didn't, atleast not without purpose. The terrorist after seeing his comrade crumple to the ground chose to man the same machine gun in order to repel the attack. Perfect weather conditions then allowed the second round contact the same area as the first one, resulted in his timely demise.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,718
0
0
Zissors said:
Bet he used Stopping Power.

OT: Thats pretty god damn awesome!
I'm guessing he had slight of hand and stopping power.

If he took commando he could have teleported to their location and knifed them.

PFFt.
 

Doitpow

New member
Mar 18, 2009
1,171
0
0
I believe it takes over 2 seconds for the bullet to travel that far, so wild compensation for wind, spin, drop. That man has, what they technically call in the army "the mad skillz".

also
I imagine he talks like the british Sniper in RA2
 

goldfalsebond

New member
Nov 19, 2009
211
0
0
there is so much to take into account. First off, you have to guess you target's movement and plan accordingly. next, there is the wind. then there is the gravity and the coreolous effect (don't know how to spell it). then, there is even the humidity. and yes, you would get hurt even if it missed.
 

Tarrou

New member
Oct 18, 2009
39
0
0
MiracleOfSound said:
Eat your heart out Hutch, Optic and T-Squared.... this is a real pro-sniper.


Now I don't know anything about sniping but my guess is that this was an extreme feat of skill, any gun owners care to explain exactly how difficult this must have been and what was involved in hitting someone from that far?

And I have been told by a buddy that at that distance with a 50 Cal bullet, due to the air it pushes up it wouldn't even have to hit you to kill you, is this true?
Ahh,finally, my area of expertise. Bona Fides, I used to carry the coveted "B4" designator, which denotes a graduate of the Long Range Infiltration and Interdiction (Sniper) school. I've trained on three primary sniper weapons, and none of them was capable of this feat, and I'll be the first to admit I wouldn't give myself one chance in fifty of hitting the shot this guy did, much less twice. It's impressive on the sort of scale I can't really convey. Long range marksmanship has always been an amalgamation of science and art, and this guy is a wizard.

The L115A3 is a hell of a rifle, and one of the most capable of extreme ranges in any nations arsenal (barring custom SF jobs). And worthy of note is that it is NOT a .50, but rather a .338 Lapua Magnum chambering, a relatively recent cartridge developed in the '80s. Also note that Harrison stated that he had taken nine ranging shots of the area in question beforehand, which lends credence to his amazing shots.

Even so, this shot was at more than twice the effective range of the rifle. Let me illustrate the difficulty here, discounting wind, (because Harrison said the wind was calm, a true rarity). Hold a bullet out at arms length and drop it, thats what happens when a bullet leaves the barrel, it drops as fast as gravity demands, it just also travels forward at high velocity. At a thousand meters, the drop on my personal weapon was 112 inches. That means I had to adjust the scope to aim 112 inches above the target for the bullet to drop into the zone. Now, the .338 is a faster cartridge than the .308 I used, but still, figure the bullet drop is at least in the same ballpark (one chart I consulted listed the .338 at 137 inches drop at 1k meters). Now note that the shot taken was 2.48 kilometers, or two and a half times the length of my benchmark shots, and recall that the bullet loses velocity over distance, and so describes an increasing parabola. The drop of that bullet would be measured in tens of meters. Now figure that at standard loadings, the .338 travels in the 2800fps category, making hte travel time to target almost three seconds. A human being can move a lot in three seconds. I hope this gives y'all some inkling, but suffice it to say, the more you know about this sort of work, the more impressive the shot is.

And at close range (less than 600 meters), a .50 can injure without contact, but I doubt there would be anything left at 2.5 klicks. Remember we're not talking about a .50 here.
 

Gh0st1y_H

New member
Jan 11, 2010
152
0
0
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned anything about the Coriolis effect in this thread, considering all the CoD talk.

What it does is it warps the scope at a certain range, so looking through the scope actually distorts what you're looking at. It's hard to explain, but the easiest way I can think of is saying that the bullet won't exactly fly a straight path to the target, even before bullet drop and wind speed are taken into consideration. At that range, Coriolis effect alone would confuse the hell out of anyone that isn't trained to be a sniper or a science major.

There are probably still a bunch of other factors in this situation that I'm unaware of. that sniper sure is good at his job.
 

Brandon237

New member
Mar 10, 2010
2,959
0
0
That is quite impressive. With a 50. cal those terrorists must have been in pieces. It makes the shot so much more rewarding.
 
Mar 9, 2009
893
0
0
DAYUM!! SHIT JUST GOT REALL OVER THUR!

I'll stop now.

But seriously, that's pretty impressive. I didn't know sniper rifles where that powerful to be able to kill someone from that far away.

I bet the insurgents knew he was there too, but didn't possibly think he could see them. So I bet they were just like jumping up and down and laughing and then they got there heads blown off.
 

Tarrou

New member
Oct 18, 2009
39
0
0
Once more........NOT A FIFTY PEOPLE.

As to Tekka, if you can't do it, don't knock it. Ol Simo is a god, no doubt, but civilians arguing over who is hte best sniper is an exercise in idiocy. It's like virgins arguing over sexual prowess. There's really no objective criteria here. Just appreciate that this was difficult on a ridiculous level.

For my part, props to Harrison for repping the marksman community in such a spectacular fashion, and best wishes for his recovery, I can empathize there.
 
Nov 7, 2009
1,247
0
0
It's their fault, they were standin' around like a bloody idiot.

Also, this makes me proud to be British. *salutes nearest Union Jack, a hundred miles or so away*