California Gay Marriage Ban Lifted

Recommended Videos

thethingthatlurks

New member
Feb 16, 2010
2,102
0
0
lordbuxton said:
Gene therapy does need more research, but it still does not justify accepting homosexuality as normal.
Yeah, we shouldn't be accepting such pitiful bigotry either. How pray tell is being an uneducated moron like you a beneficial trait? I'm sure it doesn't exactly improve your chances of reproducing...
 

ChazzBurger

New member
Mar 2, 2010
13
0
0
lordbuxton said:
The Lost Big Boss said:
MrFluffy-X said:
51.5% voted against it, 48.5% voted for it? why did people vote if it didnt matter?
Because we live in a Republic and not a Democracy. If we were in a Democracy than it would be majority rule all, all the time, aka tyranny of the many, but thats not the case in America.
MrFluffy-X said:
lordbuxton said:
Furious Styles said:
The title says it all, but here's a link

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/richard-adams-blog/2010/aug/04/proposition-8-gay-marriage-california?CMP=AFCYAH

Basically, a judge found the ban was unconstitutional.

Personally, I am pretty glad they've done this. It's a victory for civil rights and just generally great (speaking as a brit).

Thoughts? I know you're all reasonably enlightened so I can't imagine much hate for this news.
This is absolute bull.

To support gay marrige is to accept a mental disorder as "acceptable".

We should be trying to cure this disorder rather than accepting it as a part of life.
mate they are going to slaughter you, but i think its a fair opinion...
Right, ill cast the first stone...

Who are you to decide who should and shouldn't love each other? who is anyone to decide for another person who they can and can't be with. It's fuck heads like you that bring the world down, it's fuck heads like you that feel you have the authority to tell my family members how to live their life. You sir can fuck right off.
No son, you can fuck off.

Love is a chemical, it's pathetic to try and romanticise it.

As a species we should be trying to constantly improve our selves, removing genetic mutations and developing natural immunity to disease.

So it's "fuck heads" like you that are crippling the advancement of the human race.
Human race?

Or Aryan?
 

lordbuxton

New member
Aug 5, 2010
60
0
0
Your suggesting the human race would be better with serious mental disorders like austism in the gene pool ?
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,623
0
0
-Drifter- said:
lordbuxton said:
Homosexuality is caused by a recessive gene and we should be trying to remove it from the human gene pool, just like we would remove genes that caused austism. We should not be accepting it.
Oh, now I see. You're a Nazi.

Yeah, yeah, I know. Godwin's law.
I wonder if he thinks all brown eyed people should be killed too?
 

Falconus

New member
Sep 21, 2008
107
0
0
lordbuxton said:
Wow, typical liberal blowing what i say out of absoulte reason. I mean a faith gene ?

Gene therapy does need more research, but it still does not justify accepting homosexuality as normal.
Bravo Sir. you are an exceptional troll, you've managed to keep this going without pushing too much. Excellent baiting.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
MrFluffy-X said:
I believe gay marriage is wrong, that is just my opinion, Its just sounds like an oxymoron to me
Really? Sounds like equality to me, but then I guess the people that think the way you do don't care for it much as long as it doesn't affect you.
 

WindKnight

Quiet, Odd Sort.
Legacy
Jul 8, 2009
1,828
9
43
Cephiro
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Come on guys, stop feeding the troll. Report him, celebrate a victory for common sense and civil rights, and ignore him.
 

MGlBlaze

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,079
0
0
Maze1125 said:
MGlBlaze said:
Besides, I'm fairly certain that usually homosexuality is caused by overexposure to certain hormones while the foetus is still developing in the womb, not genetics so I don't think Darwin's theories even apply here, do they? I could be wrong, though.
Those hormones are, ultimately, controlled by the woman's genetics, and as such evolution would still have an effect even if it was more subtle.
Good point, thanks for letting me know.

Windknight said:
Come on guys, stop feeding the troll. Report him, celebrate a victory for common sense and civil rights, and ignore him.
Thanks to you, too. Trolls always manage to suck me in. I guess I'm one of the people who can't just walk away from ignorance. Seems there's a good number of people here with a similar mindset.
 

Bon_Clay

New member
Aug 5, 2010
744
0
0
Lordbuxton you still haven't replied to what I said, and btw I don't think you should be banned for what you have said so far, if you are just presenting opinions and not mindlessly insulting that's fine.
To sum up my position: Homosexuality is not detrimental to humans or many other species. It can help cut down on overpopulation which would be very beneficial and provide extra parents for children without them.
If marriage were a religious rite then people not following the religious rules should leave them along and find their own religion. One problem, CHRISTIANITY DID NOT INVENT MARRIAGE. NO RELIGION DID. Marriage existed completely separate from any religion for a long time, its was several hundred years before Christians started doing anything special involving their religion in marriages. And plenty of other religions have their own religious ceremonies, what if that religion didn't condemn homosexuality? That's not at all fair or equal and would clearly just be favouring one specific religion.
The legal aspects of marriage exist for taxing and census purposes, not for protecting religious or social institutions, anyone who claims that is ignorant of historical facts and is trying to rewrite them for their own benefit.
As for the overruling aspect, sometimes people are too stupid to vote for stuff, when it comes to human rights, then need to be equal, if the majority is discriminating unfairly and without any basis in fact, they are wrong.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,623
0
0
lordbuxton said:
Your suggesting the human race would be better with serious mental disorders like austism in the gene pool ?
-Snip-

I'm just going to stop feeding it. Nevermind this.
 

lordbuxton

New member
Aug 5, 2010
60
0
0
ChazzBurger said:
lordbuxton said:
The Lost Big Boss said:
MrFluffy-X said:
51.5% voted against it, 48.5% voted for it? why did people vote if it didnt matter?
Because we live in a Republic and not a Democracy. If we were in a Democracy than it would be majority rule all, all the time, aka tyranny of the many, but thats not the case in America.
MrFluffy-X said:
lordbuxton said:
Furious Styles said:
The title says it all, but here's a link

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/richard-adams-blog/2010/aug/04/proposition-8-gay-marriage-california?CMP=AFCYAH

Basically, a judge found the ban was unconstitutional.

Personally, I am pretty glad they've done this. It's a victory for civil rights and just generally great (speaking as a brit).

Thoughts? I know you're all reasonably enlightened so I can't imagine much hate for this news.
This is absolute bull.

To support gay marrige is to accept a mental disorder as "acceptable".

We should be trying to cure this disorder rather than accepting it as a part of life.
mate they are going to slaughter you, but i think its a fair opinion...
Right, ill cast the first stone...

Who are you to decide who should and shouldn't love each other? who is anyone to decide for another person who they can and can't be with. It's fuck heads like you that bring the world down, it's fuck heads like you that feel you have the authority to tell my family members how to live their life. You sir can fuck right off.
No son, you can fuck off.

Love is a chemical, it's pathetic to try and romanticise it.

As a species we should be trying to constantly improve our selves, removing genetic mutations and developing natural immunity to disease.

So it's "fuck heads" like you that are crippling the advancement of the human race.
Human race?

Or Aryan?
Human, the nazi's were to caught of in racism and aesthetic qualities.
 

Furious Styles

New member
Jul 10, 2010
1,162
0
0
lordbuxton said:
Your suggesting the human race would be better with serious mental disorders like austism in the gene pool ?
Dude, quote people. It'll get their attention so they can argue against your bullshit more effectively.

Also, yes, autism should be kept in the gene pool.

Not that its genetic in any way shape or form, you misinformed little man.
 

Maze1125

New member
Oct 14, 2008
1,679
0
0
lordbuxton said:
Your suggesting the human race would be better with serious mental disorders like austism in the gene pool ?
Yes, just as the gene for sickle-cell is of benefit in places with high cases of malaria.

Evolution isn't as black and white as your genetically inferior mind seems to think it is.
 

Furious Styles

New member
Jul 10, 2010
1,162
0
0
Bon_Clay said:
Lordbuxton you still haven't replied to what I said, and btw I don't think you should be banned for what you have said so far, if you are just presenting opinions and not mindlessly insulting that's fine.
To sum up my position: Homosexuality is not detrimental to humans or many other species. It can help cut down on overpopulation which would be very beneficial and provide extra parents for children without them.
If marriage were a religious rite then people not following the religious rules should leave them along and find their own religion. One problem, CHRISTIANITY DID NOT INVENT MARRIAGE. NO RELIGION DID. Marriage existed completely separate from any religion for a long time, its was several hundred years before Christians started doing anything special involving their religion in marriages. And plenty of other religions have their own religious ceremonies, what if that religion didn't condemn homosexuality? That's not at all fair or equal and would clearly just be favouring one specific religion.
The legal aspects of marriage exist for taxing and census purposes, not for protecting religious or social institutions, anyone who claims that is ignorant of historical facts and is trying to rewrite them for their own benefit.
As for the overruling aspect, sometimes people are too stupid to vote for stuff, when it comes to human rights, then need to be equal, if the majority is discriminating unfairly and without any basis in fact, they are wrong.
He doesn't seem to be replying to anyone. Maybe he's afraid of reasoned argument, preferring to spout crap.
 

Sovvolf

New member
Mar 23, 2009
2,341
0
0
Windknight said:
Come on guys, stop feeding the troll. Report him, celebrate a victory for common sense and civil rights, and ignore him.
I think most of us have... Just the mods must be busy at the moment. So until then we'll just have to put up with it. I still don't recommend feeding it though.