Personally I love the idea. People need to understand that his death was well-justified due to the atrocities he has committed; who can possibly argue against this idea on the grounds that it's disrespectful or any other reasons? I would love a Castro-like level on CoD.
Call of Duty: Fall of Osama?
- Thread starter sir.rutthed
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I really can recall any apart from Battlefield: Vietnam, and Black ops, waht are some other?franconbean said:
Also have any gone into detail about the soliders life, mental state and the conditions of war they suffered through? As it is what CoD games usually do well and what makes them so popular and what could also make them contraversal
Fair enough but did that have a story mode too it? Don't the Battlefeild games mainly just make multipler maps that has both sides in the battle and doesn't really have a story? I don't know since I haven't played it beforePistachio101 said:
It's too soon. I'm just saying, as a New Yorker, I can name at least fifty people who would be offended to the point of protest by that.
It'd just not be cool. Sure, it sounds cool, but so many people would be offended that it would just help the argument that games are terrible trash, and at this point that's the last thing our media needs.
It'd just not be cool. Sure, it sounds cool, but so many people would be offended that it would just help the argument that games are terrible trash, and at this point that's the last thing our media needs.
First, determine how long it took for jihadists to release a 911 simulator. Take that amount of time and double it. That is when it is culturally appropriate to make a simulator for going into peoples houses and killing them, their kids, their wives, and setting the place on fire. This way, we retain cultural superiority.
It would make an interesting game.Considering how flawless the operation went, (as far as we know)someone will definitely try to make it in a couple of years. But the actual attack on the compound would only be one short level considering the Navy Seals were only on the ground for 40 minuets.
The way Activision is grasping at straws to keep Call of Duty relevant, I wouldn't put it past them.
This might happen, but It definitely won't come from CoD. In case you hadn't noticed, realistic warfare isn't CoD's thing.
That is however, Medal of Honor's thing, so we might be able to expect something from them. (This coming from a guy who loved the single-player of the reboot. Yes, I just said "Loved," You got a problem with that? Not the multiplayer though, just the single-player)
That is however, Medal of Honor's thing, so we might be able to expect something from them. (This coming from a guy who loved the single-player of the reboot. Yes, I just said "Loved," You got a problem with that? Not the multiplayer though, just the single-player)
This is why I was, and still am, in support of Six Days in Fallujah. People need to see the war from the soldier's side. Two quotes from Black Hawk Down express my sentiments perfectly.The Youth Counselor said:
"Y'know what I think? Don't really matter what I think. Once that first bullet goes past your head, politics and all that shit just goes right out the window."- Hoot
"When I go home, people ask me, "Hey Hoot, why do you do it, man? Why? You some kind of war junkie?" I won't say a goddamn word. Why? They won't understand. They won't understand why we do it. They won't understand it's about the men next to you... and that's it. That's all it is."-Hoot
OT- I've been imagining Bin Laden's face on every OPFOR I have killed in a game since 2001. A game with his actual face in it will not make much of a difference to me.
I'm not 100% on this, but aren't some of these after BOps was released? I'm sure Magicka was, not that it affects your point so much, Naam was a long time ago, really, it's just an area few big-ticketers looked into until now, WW2 was still making shit-tons and it was still fresh and visceral at the time.TU4AR said:
