polymath said:if you can think of a reason why I'm wrong and why a game can be enjoyed for flaws on a fundamental level as a game can still be fun I'm all ears.
I wasn't being all serious, just noting a similarity. That was the first song to pop into my head as I played it. People can come to their own conclusions on if it's "lol, infringement" or bob their head and say "heh, not bad".DrOswald said:I can hear a very basic similarity, but not nearly enough to say that the one was ripped off the other. They are quite different, not even close to copyright infringement.
yes just cause 2 is a good example of this the voice acting is so poor in that game that its is outright hilarious and and it kept me playingpolymath said:First I want to clarify what I mean by this. While a film or book can be so bad it's good because of terrible writing or acting, that's because a film or book depends on that to work. So a badly written game that is fine mechanically doesn't count.
What I'm talking about is a game that's either so glitchy or so badly designed in some way that the game becomes enjoyable. Personally I just don't think a game can truly fall into this category because a game that's glitchy or that has bad mechanics would be frustrating or awkward.
For comparisons sake I'll give an example of why it doesn't work by comparing the argument to films. A film like The Room, is so bad it's good because as a film it's badly written, acted and the production values or awful. This means it can be fun to watch even it is fundamentally a bad film. On the other hand a film like the recent GI Joe film is just boring. It's technically sound and nothing in it leaps out as being exceptionally bad or good in any way. This makes the film boring to watch either as an example of a good cinema or comically bad cinema. In my view a badly made game would only be like GI Joe, a game could never survive being as badly made a game as The Room is a film because it wouldn't be fun to play through that kind of a mess of a game.
But maybe I'm wrong. I kinda hope I am because I'd like to see The Room of video games. So if you know of one suggest one, or if you can think of a reason why I'm wrong and why a game can be enjoyed for flaws on a fundamental level as a game can still be fun I'm all ears.
I've played both and none of them are that glitchy. The only probelm is that if you run over a object you might get stuck running on top of it. That's the only real Problemmjc0961 said:The Rockerfly said:I would have to say either Gears Of War or Bulletstorm. In fact most things made by Epic because they are so fucking stupid, glitchy and ridiculous but they are usually pretty fun to fuck about with![]()
I can't speak about Bulletstorm, but Gears is nowhere close to being glitchy. Maybe your 360 is on the fritz, or maybe you're the one who's "so fucking stupid" instead of Epic and you tried to run the game in a toaster or something. I don't know. But I do know that you have not accurately described the game here at all.