Cancer is cured....now what?

Recommended Videos

redisforever

New member
Oct 5, 2009
2,158
0
0
Samurai Silhouette said:
Then what? Zombie Apocalypse, duh!
Also, floating dog. Seriously, it is!

OT: Probably sleep. And then solve world hunger. And invent a better method for space travel. Then sleep some more. Then eat. Then something else. Blah, blah, blah, sleep.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
shadowstriker86 said:
Now what? what would happen in the aftermath of everything celebrating that cancer is cured?
Alzheimers,
HIV-AIDS
Cystic Fibrosis
Cerebral Palsy
Senial Dementia
Parkinson's disease

There is no shortage of horrifying degenerative ways to die or worse, be born incomplete, what's more, with my billions from a licensed and patented cancer cure I'd be able to fund research into them all!
 

SD-Fiend

Member
Legacy
Nov 24, 2009
2,075
0
1
Country
United States
Arontala said:
werewolfsfury said:
curing misanthropy and teaching the world about subjectivity. also curing atheism
Are you being... sarcastic?
just as sarcastic as the people who think all religion is a disease that should be cured as if not being religious will instantly make you smart and well adjusted person (because we all know that if you believe in any god that makes you stupid and delusional).
 

Chezza

New member
Feb 17, 2010
129
0
0
XT inc said:
Curing people of Religion maybe? That or the Common cold.
I should watch where I go with this. But in contrast to that statement, I would want to cure peoples arrogant views on blaming religion. From those who starts wars using it as an excuse, those who leverage from others with it and those who treat something which offers good life values (being religion) like its a horrible concept.

That cure should also come as a package, as it should also enable people to appreciate other peoples beliefs and remove some selfishness when you think about it.
 

klaynexas3

My shoes hurt
Dec 30, 2009
1,525
0
0
i'd go on national television, give myself cancer, and cure it on the spot, just to make my point. then after all this is done, i give myself aids and shout "let the race begin!" just to let them know i'm batshit insane

EDIT: let's make the stakes higher, i'll then give myself the flu after getting aids, just to make it more interesting if i don't cure aids in a timely fashion.
 

KiloFox

New member
Aug 16, 2011
291
0
0
NinjaDeathSlap said:
Commit suicide by overdosing on Ecstasy washed down with a bottle of Absinthe surrounded by nine hookers. Because hey, you've just cured cancer, your achievements aren't going to get any bigger than this, so you might as well quit while you're ahead in the most extravagant way possible.
i must say i agree... i'd take a different rout myself, but the gist of it is the same... you're not topping that... quit while you're ahead

XT inc said:
Curing people of Religion maybe?
y'know what... that might just be worth skipping the extravagant exit i'd probably do in that situation... assuming it'd actually be POSSIBLE that is...
 

Galletea

Inexplicably Awesome
Sep 27, 2008
2,877
0
0
Consider how beneficial my discovery would be to the world as a whole. Then probably publish my findings regardless and laugh as we take one more step towards global destruction, from my newly acquired palace.
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
shadowstriker86 said:
Now what? what would happen in the aftermath of everything celebrating that cancer is cured?
Alzheimers,
HIV-AIDS
Cystic Fibrosis
Cerebral Palsy
Senial Dementia
Parkinson's disease

There is no shortage of horrifying degenerative ways to die or worse, be born incomplete, what's more, with my billions from a licensed and patented cancer cure I'd be able to fund research into them all!
Multiple Sclerosis, for another one to add to the list.
 

SidingWithTheEnemy

New member
Sep 29, 2011
759
0
0
Now, we have to aim higher...

Don't cure cancer, or AIDS or anything.

CURE STUPIDITY!!!
and quickly please, we are running out of time.
 

BiscuitTrouser

Elite Member
May 19, 2008
2,860
0
41
shadowstriker86 said:
suppose you found a cure for cancer, not just one type but all types of cancer, the cure could be anything i.e. having to eat 7 lbs. of string cheese and 3 cups of salsa while having to watch the extended cut of return of the king (ya the 5 hour version or however long it is) but the point is, you cured it. Now what? what would happen in the aftermath of everything celebrating that cancer is cured?
Actually the drug that extends scenescence (cell lifespan) is the one that could effectively prevent our bodies from aging. Scenescence was developed to stop horrible cancer ravaging us. Yes at a fundamental level the second we became multicellular we evolved aging to prevent instant and extreme cancer. However with cancer cured we can now use the drugs we have to prevent scenescence and instantly stop the horrible tumors that would arrise from doing so, thus allowing us to be potentially immortal and un aging. Im doing my uni paper on this topic, curing cancer would be a massive step in realising biological immortality, we have drugs that can help but the side effect of cancer needless to say makes them very unviable.


itchcrotch said:
then there'd be a population crisis, in which too much of the populace is too old, thus not productive. i believe australia and japan are having this problem at the moment.
Ickorus said:
I'd cure death and only distribute it to close friends and family, not because I hate everyone but because i'td lead to insane overpopulation otherwise, though I suppose if death just didn't happen anymore colonising other planets would be pretty easy.
Miles000 said:
XT inc said:
Curing people of Religion maybe?
I was going to say sit back and watch overpopulation get worse.

But I like this idea better XD
Wrong, the population is meant to level at 9 billion, which we can EASILY feed RIGHT NOW. The only issue is distribution is poor, first world countries have all the food and corrupt third world country governments wont allow their people to recieve it in fair ratios.

Fuck me people since when did we not like to reduce suffering because of false fears of over population. If we actually fed third world countries (the ones DOING the overpopulating) then global population would be very steady.

The people in the green are not living long enough to die of cancer. So yeah, deny the yellow that cure and all you are doing is hurting everyone. Then finally get food to the green to slow population increase.

 

Not Lord Atkin

I'm dead inside.
Oct 25, 2008
648
0
0
XT inc said:
Curing people of Religion maybe? That or the Common cold.
there's nothing wrong with religion in itself, how about getting rid of religious (and any other kind of) extremism though?
 

Ickorus

New member
Mar 9, 2009
2,887
0
0
BiscuitTrouser said:
shadowstriker86 said:
suppose you found a cure for cancer, not just one type but all types of cancer, the cure could be anything i.e. having to eat 7 lbs. of string cheese and 3 cups of salsa while having to watch the extended cut of return of the king (ya the 5 hour version or however long it is) but the point is, you cured it. Now what? what would happen in the aftermath of everything celebrating that cancer is cured?
Actually the drug that extends scenescence (cell lifespan) is the one that could effectively prevent our bodies from aging. Scenescence was developed to stop horrible cancer ravaging us. Yes at a fundamental level the second we became multicellular we evolved aging to prevent instant and extreme cancer. However with cancer cured we can now use the drugs we have to prevent scenescence and instantly stop the horrible tumors that would arrise from doing so, thus allowing us to be potentially immortal and un aging. Im doing my uni paper on this topic, curing cancer would be a massive step in realising biological immortality, we have drugs that can help but the side effect of cancer needless to say makes them very unviable.


itchcrotch said:
then there'd be a population crisis, in which too much of the populace is too old, thus not productive. i believe australia and japan are having this problem at the moment.
Ickorus said:
I'd cure death and only distribute it to close friends and family, not because I hate everyone but because i'td lead to insane overpopulation otherwise, though I suppose if death just didn't happen anymore colonising other planets would be pretty easy.
Miles000 said:
XT inc said:
Curing people of Religion maybe?
I was going to say sit back and watch overpopulation get worse.

But I like this idea better XD
Wrong, the population is meant to level at 9 billion, which we can EASILY feed RIGHT NOW. The only issue is distribution is poor, first world countries have all the food and corrupt third world country governments wont allow their people to recieve it in fair ratios.

Fuck me people since when did we not like to reduce suffering because of false fears of over population. If we actually fed third world countries (the ones DOING the overpopulating) then global population would be very steady.

The people in the green are not living long enough to die of cancer. So yeah, deny the yellow that cure and all you are doing is hurting everyone. Then finally get food to the green to slow population increase.

Im talking more along the lines of if nobody ever dies they'll still likely be having kids and thus probably before the year was out we'd have several billion extra people and we'd continue to do so until the planet was like a gigantic can of sardines.
 

BiscuitTrouser

Elite Member
May 19, 2008
2,860
0
41
itchcrotch said:
am i extremely interested in this!
tell me more! don't be a afraid to get detailed, i have a limited but not non-existant understanding of biology and cell science. i want to know more!
my uncle was telling me a little while ago about some scientists who managed to swich of a production of a certain chemical or cell function (i can't remember) and the mice's organs began rapidly degrading, then as soon as they switched it back on, the organs became healthy again, as if they had controlled the rate of aging.
Love a person who wants to get educated. Ill summarise my paper for you.

Senescence is the shortening of telomere length in DNA with every reproduction of a cell. The value called Hayflicks limit is the amount of times a cell can divide before the telomeres get too short and it cant divide anymore. Stem cells have no limit, but the second they differenciate into specific cells they are affected by this process. Rats have 15 divides. Gallapagos tortoises get 115. After this cells start to die without replacing themselves properly in what we call apoptosis, or cell suicide. They kill themselves in an orderly way, gathering everything together into a package to be taken and broken down for parts, rather than die chaotically because the enzymes in them would damage other cells.

Anyway when you reach hayflicks limits (some cells get there before others) tissues start to weaken and become damaged, thus why organ failure is so common in the very old. Reaching hayflicks limit was impossible before because we died so early, now we actually achieve our biological clock age. Dolly the sheep died early btw because she was cloned from a cell that was already halfway through hayflicks limit, thus she was born with all cells having shorter telomere length. That meant she effectively was born with a biological age of 5. Weird stuff.

Ages ago we developed this to fight cancer. When the telomere shortening gene stops, the one that actively makes cells age, a tumor starts, as cells now have no hayflicks limit or dividing regulation they become "immortal". Yep cancer is immortal as long as it is fed. Cool story, there is over 10 metric tonnes of a woman who had the most aggressive tumor ever that is used all over globe as testing tissue, simply because her tumor divided so fast it was easy to use. And immortal as long as it was fed. Fun stuff.

Some animals are immortal, a jellyfish called turritopsis nutricula can turn all its cells into stem cells, refreshing telomere length and starting the process again as an embreo. Its very cool stuff and a lot of my paper is on this jellyfish. Jellyfish though are very simplistic organisms, so cancer isnt an issue for them, especially seeing as they can do this before they even get close to hayflicks limit for them. They are however slow tastey and stupid so population isnt really an issue for them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomerase

Telomerase. Causer of cancer and the enzyme that can repair telomeres back to full, thus reversing aging. If we can beat cancer, we can enable this enzyme and not get a tumor. We could use it to live forever. Stem cells are caked in it, which means they dont age, so is your immune system. Your heart muscles and brain? Not so much.
Tests on mice show it makes them live longer biologically but causes cancer. Thus our problem today. Your uncle was talking about these tests. The mice do show a reaction to the enzyme.

Interesting stuff? I hope you think so. Glad to help, ask any questions you may have.
 

OpticalJunction

Senior Member
Jul 1, 2011
599
6
23
shadowstriker86 said:
suppose you found a cure for cancer, not just one type but all types of cancer, the cure could be anything i.e. having to eat 7 lbs. of string cheese and 3 cups of salsa while having to watch the extended cut of return of the king (ya the 5 hour version or however long it is) but the point is, you cured it. Now what? what would happen in the aftermath of everything celebrating that cancer is cured?
As Gump would say "that's one less thing"
Now let's turn our attention to aids, diabetes, alzheimer's and and all the other wonderful diseases that plague our pathetically vulnerable organic systems.
 

josemlopes

New member
Jun 9, 2008
3,950
0
0
Mortis Nuncius said:
I'd start whittling down the population by perfecting a zombie virus (while developing a cure simultaniously), unleash it in some foreign country, make it look like an outbreak from some underground laboratory then hand out a cure to make me even more famous! :D
You do know thats the way things get out of hand and everyone dies in the movies right? Just warning you since the evil scientist guy is the one with the goriest death.
 

Tortilla the Hun

Decidedly on the Fence
May 7, 2011
2,244
0
0
josemlopes said:
Mortis Nuncius said:
I'd start whittling down the population by perfecting a zombie virus (while developing a cure simultaniously), unleash it in some foreign country, make it look like an outbreak from some underground laboratory then hand out a cure to make me even more famous! :D
You do know thats the way things get out of hand and everyone dies in the movies right? Just warning you since the evil scientist guy is the one with the goriest death.
Pfffft, that's not gonna happen. I'll make sure to be extra careful this time. Erm...not that there was another time I had unleashed a terrible virus on mankind... >.>