In a country where they have a fairr few daft laws, it supprises me that they're so lenient on this.
If his mum had kept him prisoner and starved him, then killing her because he was hungry would be okay, but doing it because he'd ganbled his food-cash away just makes him a failure and a moron as well as a psyco and an arsehole.
If his mum had kept him prisoner and starved him, then killing her because he was hungry would be okay, but doing it because he'd ganbled his food-cash away just makes him a failure and a moron as well as a psyco and an arsehole.