He's not a rapist.
She claims she was raped by him but this was never proven and he was never convicted of that particular offence.
Also, you may think you have the right to say or not say whatever you want without repercussion, but that is incorrect.
Freedom of Speech is not designed to protect you in the way that she is claiming to 'use' it. In fact, by claiming that he is a rapist and making a stand against him (when nothing of the sort has been proven) is defamation.
Whether she was or wasn't raped is irrelevant. It couldn't be proven, only what he pleaded guilty to.
She claims she was raped by him but this was never proven and he was never convicted of that particular offence.
Also, you may think you have the right to say or not say whatever you want without repercussion, but that is incorrect.
Freedom of Speech is not designed to protect you in the way that she is claiming to 'use' it. In fact, by claiming that he is a rapist and making a stand against him (when nothing of the sort has been proven) is defamation.
Whether she was or wasn't raped is irrelevant. It couldn't be proven, only what he pleaded guilty to.