China riots, island tensions and the UN -updated

Recommended Videos

Moth_Monk

New member
Feb 26, 2012
819
0
0
What makes all of this so laughably ridiculous is that most of the people involved now were not around when these racist blood feuds began. So why do these people even care?

(My above sentiment of course applies to anyone who carries on blood feuds for no other reason than "I don't like group X because their 'parents' did something (I may not even know fully :D) to my 'parents.')
 

JeffBergGold

New member
Aug 3, 2012
194
0
0
Krois said:
Not to incur the wrath of this thread but I think all riots are the same - blown way out of proportion at best. That riot in London about the police shooting a kid not long ago had random robbing and vandalism too which had nothing to do with the goal of the protest itself, people just took advantage of it.

Although I'm Chinese, I hardly cares about the history of what which country done to another over what back in the days. I respect the fact it is actual history that those pointless massacre and war deaths occurred but are we suppose to carry those kind of hating passion all the way through the future as if it's part of us?

This whole island business seems silly to me to begin with. It's like argument on the internet on a bigger scale to prove who got bigger epeen.
China has been running on injured pride for a loong time I don't believe for a second that they aren't going to payback Japan in someway for all the messed up things they did. China is simply biding its time. I don't think the US would honor their treaty with Japan. They wouldn't fully wage war, they'd temporarily engage and then pull out.

People tend to forget since the Japanese made those cartoons we love so much that they were just as bad arguably worse than the Third Reich.
 

kuolonen

New member
Nov 19, 2009
290
0
0
Moth_Monk said:
What makes all of this so laughably ridiculous is that most of the people involved now were not around when these racist blood feuds began. So why do these people even care?

(My above sentiment of course applies to anyone who carries on blood feuds for no other reason than "I don't like group X because their 'parents' did something (I may not even know fully :D) to my 'parents.')
Basically they have been brought up by chinese government to it. The communist party had the brilliant idea to help unify the country, by growing up young chinese into ultra nationalists and to shift attention from the rather iffy state of human rights in China. This involved spreading japanese hatred, which has been very effective. I remember watching document say that the younger generation in China hates the japanese more than the ones who actually suffered the atrocities. So, yeah.

Still, cant help but wonder if anyone at the top of people republic of China understands what hell they are breeding for themselves. They have in their hands a generation of fanatical nationalists greedy for war and composed with a majority of males due to one child policy. This is going to blow on their faces and hard.
 

Fluffythepoo

New member
Sep 29, 2011
445
0
0
ResonanceSD said:
SmashLovesTitanQuest said:



What's this saying? o_O


Nationalism. The ultimate killer of any sensible society. Well done China, well done indeed. This is why no one on Earth is willing to treat you like a grown up.
i am :(

also: itd be nice if china invaded japan for a change
 

Squilookle

New member
Nov 6, 2008
3,584
0
0
JeffBergGold said:
I don't think the US would honor their treaty with Japan. They wouldn't fully wage war, they'd temporarily engage and then pull out.
Strictly speaking from what I've read about history, the US Military doesn't seem to know the meaning of "temporarily engage and then pull out."

Seems to me that once they get a taste for combat in a region, they stay until either they win outright, or until LONG after they should have admitted defeat and gone home.

ResonanceSD said:
Fluffythepoo said:
also: itd be nice if china invaded japan for a change

Oh yeah, invasion, always a hell of a time.


This was literally the first thing that came to mind when I read that. Invasion, Wa-Hey!
 

Overusedname

Emcee: the videogame video guy
Jun 26, 2012
950
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
But the Chinese government has a solid grip on the media, so the only reason these riots are happening is because they want it to happen.
Now THAT statement is more than a little debatable. They certainly control the media, but the benefit from starting this much violence, hatred and damage in the country locally is kinda hard to see.

But it is mostly the fault of government and media, yes. I just don't think they WANTED this to occur. They might have, but in my experience, people like this are usually just stupid, rather than evil.
 

Lord_Gremlin

New member
Apr 10, 2009
744
0
0
I'm Russian and I'm in support of Japan here. I wouldn't even mind if our government sold them those islands of ours they want so badly... But this whole story just reeks - I mean, it's not like this is invasion or theft!
Damn you Chinese... Stuff like this always happens every time they feel like their "national interests" are touched in a slightest. This whole ruckus reminds me of old stories of Chinese showing naked butts to passing trains because those railroads were made in collaboration with USSR. Good god, grow up...
It's kinda scary too. Knowing that your neighbors are going nutz.
 

Suijen

New member
Apr 15, 2009
195
0
0
If you're from a third world country that was a former colonized territory, then you'd understand the importance of sovereignty to third world countries. This may be a surprise to many of you, but China's not the only country that cares about sovereignty and pride. The ROK also has island disputes with Japan that have gotten quite ugly, and Pakistan and India are still throwing rocks at each other over Kashmir. The list can go on.

This wasn't actually that big an issue but the Japanese government decided to spark things up by purchasing the islands because it's time for an election in Japan, and nothing shows you're tough like starting things up. The problem is that if China recognizes the islands as Chinese territory, then the Japanese government has no legitimate right to purchase said land. This is why China and India have a border dispute; if China doesn't recognize that Tibet has the right to distribute its land with India, then any agreement is null.

It's unlikely the Chinese government inspired the riots because it forces China to play a hand when it doesn't want to. Now's a sensitive time for the Chinese leadership, and going to war right now really isn't in China's favor. This forces China to act, which is why they sent the ships, but haven't landed any troops. They don't want it to escalate. But they also can't stop the riots because it makes you look like a complete sellout. The Chinese people already hate the Japanese, but you're going to protect Japanese businesses from your own people? Will you expect Muslim policemen to beat other Muslims to protect an American who insults your religion? Considering how half-hearted Muslim police officers protected American embassies, apparently not.

This is a bit different than before because the possibility of escalation is pretty high. China won't back down, and its people will not back down either. They're pissed at Japan, but also pissed at the Chinese government for being pansies. That's why they're carrying Mao's portrait around and not Hu's.
 

cerebus23

New member
May 16, 2010
1,275
0
0
Suijen said:
If you're from a third world country that was a former colonized territory, then you'd understand the importance of sovereignty to third world countries. This may be a surprise to many of you, but China's not the only country that cares about sovereignty and pride. The ROK also has island disputes with Japan that have gotten quite ugly, and Pakistan and India are still throwing rocks at each other over Kashmir. The list can go on.

This wasn't actually that big an issue but the Japanese government decided to spark things up by purchasing the islands because it's time for an election in Japan, and nothing shows you're tough like starting things up. The problem is that if China recognizes the islands as Japanese territory, then the Japanese government has no legitimate right to purchase said land. This is why China and India have a border dispute; if China doesn't recognize that Tibet has the right to distribute its land with India, then any agreement is null.

It's unlikely the Chinese government inspired the riots because it forces China to play a hand when it doesn't want to. Now's a sensitive time for the Chinese leadership, and going to war right now really isn't in China's favor. This forces China to act, which is why they sent the ships, but haven't landed any troops. They don't want it to escalate. But they also can't stop the riots because it makes you look like a complete sellout. The Chinese people already hate the Japanese, but you're going to protect Japanese businesses from your own people? Will you expect Muslim policemen to beat other Muslims to protect an American who insults your religion? Considering how half-hearted Muslim police officers protected American embassies, apparently not.

This is a bit different than before because the possibility of escalation is pretty high. China won't back down, and its people will not back down either. They're pissed at Japan, but also pissed at the Chinese government for being pansies. That's why they're carrying Mao's portrait around and not Hu's.

Korea and japan have a long storied history of hatred and racisism, one thing you can always call japan out on is their extreme xenophobia and outright racial hatred between them and their neighbors. it is very telling that their word for "foreigner" means barbarian they have always seen themselves as more evolved and mature than other races traditionally, and they have not been afraid to express that.

If china invades japan however forget the USA, we are so owned by china it is not even funny when you national debt is greater than the entire age of the universe by a large margin and china holds the majority of it.

But would the world stand for such an act? Since china is such a come late to the party protest over these islands, and their general if it can make us money we want it no matter if we said anything before now or not, this is not some long standing dispute that goes back generations of tensions and conflict, this is something that cropped up the minute someone discovered oil and gas there *huge shocker* and china is getting ready to change leaders.

Add a dash of china's previous bulletproof economy starting to tank in the face of global economic woes, and this new leader and china may very well do something galactically stupid and start ww3.

I would also find it highly unlikely that the EU and others would not get involved if it escalated beyond saber rattling and grandstanding. Even if the US is on the sidelines because china bankrupted us over night, and even at that nothing says we cannot sell the EU and other all that military hardware we cant afford to run anymore.
 

Suijen

New member
Apr 15, 2009
195
0
0
In Chinese, the word they use is 老外, or lao wai, which basically means old outsider. This basically means anyone outside of China's traditional imperial sphere of influence. Now it's just a generic term for non-East Asian foreigner, and carries no positive or negative intention nor is it really condescension or inappropriate to call someone that anymore it is for a Brit to call an E. Asian an oriental. A Japanese to the Chinese is not a lao wai.

I don't think debt has anything to do with US's willingness to defend Japan. The US is obligated to defend Japan, but it officially takes no side in the dispute, and would rather see peace between the US's largest Asian ally and its largest trade partner. It's unlikely that the American public really wants the US to become entangled with a war with China for obvious reasons. For China, which is still growing at 8%, warring with Japan can only backfire. It backfires if they win because they look aggressive at a time when China is spending so much of its money trying to appease its neighbors (and they really do talk Peaceful Rise seriously), and if China loses the party just looks pathetic.

The EU definitely would not get involved. There wouldn't be a point to it.
 

cerebus23

New member
May 16, 2010
1,275
0
0
I think invading a sovereign nation in this day and age would bring near world wide scorn, and how could the EU and others not get involved if that were to happen?

I would be shocked not to see the "free world" take a stand. If such aggression were to occur.

Sure we should pursue peace, but the main message should be "back off" to china.
 

Kopikatsu

New member
May 27, 2010
4,924
0
0
I don't know if it was mentioned, but Japan has no real standing army. The US currently has an agreement with Japan (made after WWII) that while Japan was forced to dissolve their navy and air force, America would protect them in exchange for the disarmament. So a China vs Japan war is actually a US vs China war. But China owns the majority of America's loans, which means that conflict with them could cause America to financially collapse.

But go 'merica.
 

RoonMian

New member
Mar 5, 2011
524
0
0
Maybe it's because I am German but for some reason the first thing I'm reminded of by this mess is:


 

OniaPL

New member
Nov 9, 2010
1,057
0
0
Take a pinch of domestic politics and throw them into the pot.
Now, throw in some foreign politics, and mix them carefully.
Let it boil on the stove for 3-4 months.

Your world-scale crisis is now ready! Best serving size is extra large.
 

Froggy Slayer

New member
Jul 13, 2012
1,434
0
0
Oh God, I hope that this little grudge match doesn't erupt into a full scale war. Especially since this is the kind of thing that could set off Korea again.

CAPTCHA: Last Straw. Thanks for adding fuel to my worries.
 

Froggy Slayer

New member
Jul 13, 2012
1,434
0
0
Kopikatsu said:
I don't know if it was mentioned, but Japan has no real standing army. The US currently has an agreement with Japan (made after WWII) that while Japan was forced to dissolve their navy and air force, America would protect them in exchange for the disarmament. So a China vs Japan war is actually a US vs China war. But China owns the majority of America's loans, which means that conflict with them could cause America to financially collapse.

But go 'merica.
However, Japan does at least have the JSDF. The Japanese don't have an 'army', but the JSDF will step in if the Chinese actual try anything.
 

mattttherman3

New member
Dec 16, 2008
3,105
0
0
Well, from what I know of those 2 countries, I'm pretty sure they have never really seen eye to eye, you should look up the shit that was done to the chineese in WW2