Don't get me wrong, I understand the reasoning that went into the Species and the aspects of them, I just get a little nuts with what they're supporting with them.Duskflamer said:Not that I like those cliches, but in Bioware's defense, they established that Asari/Asari offspring can end up going insane with power, which likely brought about a stigma against such pairs once it was realized that they could breed with any other species (a process that also expands their gene pool). As to the Batarians, my understanding is that the majority of their civilization is on-and-off at war with the Council races, so any impressions given about them have to be taken with that in account.
There are a lot of cliches in Mass Effect, but the Asari species just feels like a 'space babe' to me. You can make a species that reproduces asexually by getting DNA from other species, but there's no reason to make them into a sexually appealing species that's only different from humans in skin color and the head tentacles. They could have been completely androgynous or neuter and that wouldn't have changed anything in the story...but they made them into sex symbols and the most common profession you see them in is 'Exotic dancer' followed in second place by 'mercenary'.
Batarians...they're like the worst stereotypes of Nazis, Communists and Confederates rolled into one. They're militant invaders who make use of deceitful propaganda, and are deeply involved in slavery. They're crafted to have no redeeming qualities, and just feel like a cardboard cut-out species that are set up to be gunned own with no remorse. Almost every Batarian is a villain. Even the Krogan, a warrior race who are feared by the Galaxy represent more diversity than the Batarians.