Comic shop boycotts Action Comics for "taking the lords name in vain"

Recommended Videos

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
As some people may know, DC as just recently relaunched all their books at #1, including the longest running comic book ever Action Comics. Written by Grant Morrison this new interpritation of Superman is much closer to bolder, working mans hero, super jerk of his 1938 dabute, but that's not what's got this comic book guy rialed up.

Basically Fundementalist Christian runs a comic book shop. Hilarity ensues.

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/09/08/north-carolina-comic-shop-to-boycott-action-comics/

The funniest thing about it is Superman doesn't say "God". He says "GD" after being shot at by a tank. It could have just as easily been a grunt.



EDIT: Grant Morrison has responded to the boycott saying that "GD" was not a shorted god or god damn, it's was a grunt.

Grant Morrison said:
"It should go without saying that the offending panel and caption, a mere "GD", is a sound effect grunt ? to suggest Superman?s breath being forced through gritted teeth ? much like 'DHH', 'GNUHH' or the many others used throughout this book and in general in the comics business. It's not in any way representative of God or a curse."
In respond the comic shop owner has lifted the boycott.

Crazy man said:
"Thank you Grant Morrison. The boycott is lifted. Once again my apologies to Grant for the unwarranted name calling. Thank you to those who supported my stance. To those who didn't? I respect your opinions. To those who only posted to bash Christians and people with opinions different from yours...grow up and get a life."
So yeah...seems this craziness was over before it even began.

http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2011/09/grant-morrison-clarifies-that-yes-gd-is-a-grunt-not-a-blasphemy/
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
This is kind of silly I can understand his offense to some extent if he did say 'God' but he didn't even do that. Also I'm confused why a Fundamentalist Christian runs a comic book shop.. Surely Superman would be the only thing he'd feel comfortable selling. I mean I can't see him reading The Killing Joke...

Off topic I just ordered 1-3 of batman, wonder woman, superman and supergirl and I'm very excited to read them :)
 

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,292
0
0
North Carolina Comic shop to receive unnecessary free publicity. I don't even see why it's a problem, it's realistic, people do take the lord's name in vain when in stressful situations, being shot by a tank is stressful.
 

Kpt._Rob

Travelling Mushishi
Apr 22, 2009
2,417
0
0
xXxJessicaxXx said:
This is kind of silly I can understand his offense to some extent if he did say 'God' but he didn't even do that. Also I'm confused why a Fundamentalist Christian runs a comic book shop.. Surely Superman would be the only thing he'd feel comfortable selling. I mean I can't see him reading The Killing Joke...

Off topic I just ordered 1-3 of batman, wonder woman, superman and supergirl and I'm very excited to read them :)
Why would a fundamentalist Christain be comfortable selling Superman? Yes, he's often pictured as a big blue boyscout. That said, DC is often less than subtle in comparing him to a literal God. Of all the heroes, I would think he'd be one of the ones they were the least comfortable with.

But oh well, it's their loss really. Action Comics #1 was amazing. I've been looking forward to it ever since the beginning of the Flashpoint event, and it did not disappoint.

Incidentially, if you pre-ordered #1-3 of Batman and Superman, you might want to check out Action Comics and Detective Comics as well (and Justice League, just cause it kicks ass). Action Comics isn't exactly the origin story for Superman, but it is covering the events from the five years leading up to when the new Superman series will be set. And the story Detective Comics is running right now has Batman and the Joker and it was really really good.

Though my surprise favorite of the new series they've released so far has actually been Justice League: International. So if anyone's interested in it, they should check it out. It's worth reading for Rocket Red alone.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Kpt._Rob said:
xXxJessicaxXx said:
This is kind of silly I can understand his offense to some extent if he did say 'God' but he didn't even do that. Also I'm confused why a Fundamentalist Christian runs a comic book shop.. Surely Superman would be the only thing he'd feel comfortable selling. I mean I can't see him reading The Killing Joke...

Off topic I just ordered 1-3 of batman, wonder woman, superman and supergirl and I'm very excited to read them :)
Why would a fundamentalist Christain be comfortable selling Superman? Yes, he's often pictured as a big blue boyscout. That said, DC is often less than subtle in comparing him to a literal God. Of all the heroes, I would think he'd be one of the ones they were the least comfortable with.
My point kind of was they all have pretty dark storylines but Superman often springs to mind has the 'cleanest' superhero which is why I said that. It's true Superman does have his messaniac leanings...

I will check out Justice League... I have no idea why I didn't think to order that too... :|

Thanks for the recommendations :) <3
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
Kpt._Rob said:
But oh well, it's their loss really. Action Comics #1 was amazing. I've been looking forward to it ever since the beginning of the Flashpoint event, and it did not disappoint.

Incidentially, if you pre-ordered #1-3 of Batman and Superman, you might want to check out Action Comics and Detective Comics as well (and Justice League, just cause it kicks ass). Action Comics isn't exactly the origin story for Superman, but it is covering the events from the five years leading up to when the new Superman series will be set. And the story Detective Comics is running right now has Batman and the Joker and it was really really good.

Though my surprise favorite of the new series they've released so far has actually been Justice League: International. So if anyone's interested in it, they should check it out. It's worth reading for Rocket Red alone.
Action Comics #1 is fantastic. I've never felt my blood pumping reading a comic book like that, it really takes "[b/]Action[/b] comics" very literally. Great version of Superman too, and lots of little references and clues of what's to come.

Don't know about JLI, I've heard very mixed things.

I would definitly recommend Swamp Thing and Animal Man, both of them were fantastic starts, great for horror lovers. Some really creepy stuff in those issues.
 

Kolby Jack

Come at me scrublord, I'm ripped
Apr 29, 2011
2,519
0
0
Doesn't somebody say "MY GOD!" at least once in just about every comic in existence? How do they stay in business?
 

SenseOfTumour

New member
Jul 11, 2008
4,514
0
0
Can I suggest he has a flicks thru any copies of Preacher he may have in stock?

I think he's gonna stop worrying about a single throwaway line :D

EDIT: just read the actual link, damn, he's fine with 'The Boys' yet this has him riled?

I'd say he's as obsessive fan of Superman as he is Jesus, he seems to be more outraged that this Superman does things slightly different, I sense there'd have been a boycott if Superman's cape was a new colour.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,526
4,295
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
why the hell would a fundie christian own a comic shop anyway?
 
Dec 27, 2010
814
0
0
Yay, an "all-American" Fundamentalist Christian did something stupid! Let's poke him with a stick.

Really, I'm not sure why this is worthy of any form of coverage, surely it's only likely to convince more idiots to boycott the comic.
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
I thought "not taking the lord's name in vain" was supposed to mean "not going on an unrightful campaign and claiming that it's done in the lord's name"

Well, whatever. I'll just point and laugh. Because, seriously, the silliness of some people.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Hmmmm, well I think this is a silly place to draw the line, and religion shouldn't enter into it, but I do tend to agree that comics have been becoming FAR too left wing and need a bit more balance in perspective.

Just because I think it's silly does not mean I don't understand it though, he DOES have a point, Superman is supposed to be an American icon, he's kind of the counterpoint that exists to compare other, darker, more extreme heroes to. Desicians like having Superman renounce American citizenship, and taking the Lord's name in vain, don't really fit the character. Like it or not, Superman is supposed to represent traditional American ideals and the defense of our society, without turning it into some kind of criticism, hypocricy, or massive social statement about how bad we in the US suck. Beyond the entire bit with him taking the lord's name in vain, the idea of Superman fighting to protect the working man from capitalist exploitation (ie a left wing ideal) doesn't really fit the character. See Superman is supposed to be more about the "big picture", part of the point of other, darker, characters was how they would slink around the shadows and deal with those kinds of grittier issues while Superman was smashing space aliens and replacing the fallen American flag. Part of what gives comics depth was having unabashed, non-hypocritical good guys, with differant approaches that dealt with differant levels of issues, but were all still good guys and would ultimatly wind up working together even if they didn't always agree.

Superman dealing with this kind of thing and being more "street level" kind of ruins the whole dynamic between him and characters like Batman, and their odd friendship (even though Batman is kind of racist towards him, but that's another entire discussion). Batman fights crime but works on a lower level to try and make a differance on the street, he sees Superman as a sort of blunt object that works well for certain things but not for everything, and Superman can't always disagree with that assumption, but himself occasionally has problems with Batman's methods and him not being assertive enough (as odd as that sounds). In team comics this comes through in the Dynamics where guys like Superman and the JLA pretty much lead with their jaws, where Batman works around the edges... at least most times.


The point here being that I don't like the reboot myself, albiet for differant reasons. I doubt I'll be buying it. I feel the same way about it that I do about things like Marvel's "Ultimate" universe and so on. I prefer to stick with the normal continuity and the characters as they are supposed to be. When it comes to reboots I think that the comic companies should consider just creating new characters or continuities rather than trying to change characters while keeping a recognized name.

To be honest the "liberal superman, dealing with real issues" schtick has been done before, Marvel's "Supreme Power", and DC's own "Wildstorm" universe have both covered this ground. "Wildstorm" have both "The High" and "Apollo" who fit that bill to a 'T'. If they want to do Superman this way, maybe they should put more backing behind Wildstorm and the rather thinly veiled Superman clones already doing this.
 

Kpt._Rob

Travelling Mushishi
Apr 22, 2009
2,417
0
0
SomeBritishDude said:
Kpt._Rob said:
But oh well, it's their loss really. Action Comics #1 was amazing. I've been looking forward to it ever since the beginning of the Flashpoint event, and it did not disappoint.

Incidentially, if you pre-ordered #1-3 of Batman and Superman, you might want to check out Action Comics and Detective Comics as well (and Justice League, just cause it kicks ass). Action Comics isn't exactly the origin story for Superman, but it is covering the events from the five years leading up to when the new Superman series will be set. And the story Detective Comics is running right now has Batman and the Joker and it was really really good.

Though my surprise favorite of the new series they've released so far has actually been Justice League: International. So if anyone's interested in it, they should check it out. It's worth reading for Rocket Red alone.
Action Comics #1 is fantastic. I've never felt my blood pumping reading a comic book like that, it really takes "[b/]Action[/b] comics" very literally. Great version of Superman too, and lots of little references and clues of what's to come.

Don't know about JLI, I've heard very mixed things.

I would definitly recommend Swamp Thing and Animal Man, both of them were fantastic starts, great for horror lovers. Some really creepy stuff in those issues.
Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I for one loved JL:I. I don't think it'll be the most epic of superhero series, that said, it's got some fun characters, a really good sense of humor, and what looks to be a good, if somewhat classic at this point, plot. You've got Rocket Red, who has that overstated Russian accent which probably shouldn't be funny, but it is. Booster Gold as the mildly inept team leader, chosen, it would seem, because his need for attention makes him easy for the UN to control. Batman shows up to help them along, and brings with him that very dark Bat humor that you just can't get from any other character. And the rest of the team, while they haven't gotten too much play yet, seems like they have the potential to be fun interesting characters.

As for Swamp Thing, I found myself surprisingly underwhelmed with the first issue. It's one of the series I was actually the most excited for, and I'm not going to dismiss it just yet, but the pacing of that first issue just really didn't work for me. I think part of the problem is that in the case of Swamp Thing, it's the one relaunch title I've read which most clearly follows in the footsteps of events from before Flashpoint.

Specifically, the tale from Swamp Thing #1 is referencing the events of Brightest Day #24, and the Brightest Day Aftermath miniseries The Search for Swamp Thing. But the thing is that the whole Alec Holland isn't Swamp Thing anymore thing was pretty well established by the conclusion of the mini. Now granted, it hadn't been explored from Holland's perspective, as it was in #1, that said, after the awesome build up to the series we got in Search for Swamp Thing, I was really hoping things would start with a little more of a bang and a little less of a whimper.

Not that that's entirely unfitting if they hope for the new series to be reminiscent of Alan Moore's run, which I suspect they do. Moore's take on the character was pretty cerebral, if not a little bit mopey at times, and it rarely went anywhere too fast until it reached the climax. Not only that, the villain looks and has a modus operandi surprisingly similar to one seen in Moore's run. Not that inserting flies into people's ears to control them was unique to Swamp Thing, as I recall it happened in some of the earlier Hellblazer comics, so take it for what you will. Hell, considering that Swampy and John Constantine have crossed paths before, it's not entirely unreasonable to think they might pit him against one of the demons from the early Hellblazer series.

Whatever they do, I must admit that after reading some about Animal Man in the column in the back I have found myself a little intrigued. Mostly by mention of The Red, which I assume has some similarities to The Green, only less for plants and more for animals. So perhaps I'll have to check it out.
 

mrblakemiller

New member
Aug 13, 2010
319
0
0
I was going to come on this thread and defend my faith, but then I saw that all Superman says is "GD." It could be an initialism of taking God's name in vain. It's more likely onomatopoeia. I really don't see why this guy is making a big deal of it or reading so much into those two letters. Unless he knew it would put his shop's name out there. Seriously, my favorite comic writer is Garth Ennis and I can no longer read my once-favorite comic, Preacher, because it convicts my faith. If he's okay selling The Boys, which, aside from being needlessly violent and blasphemous, is also utterly devoid of plot and sympathetic characters, it seems pretty obvious that he was trying to get on the news with this. I wish he'd made a different choice.
 

jack583

New member
Oct 26, 2010
301
0
0
the store owner has the right the sell what he or she wants to sell.
if they don't aggree with something, they don't have to sell it.

on the other hand, being christian is about choice--because everything you do is a choice.
so just because someone who doesn't believe in god, does not allow you to protest them.

but that doesn't give non-christians a reason to insult our faith.
if i recall correctly, the phrase "damn" is sort for "god, damn this to hell", it's an inappropreate thing to say. this phrase goes against two things that are taught in the christian faith; "thou shalt not kill" and "we serve the lord, we do not give orders to god".
so, hopefully, you can see why a christian would find this offensive.

also:
Jonluw said:
I thought "not taking the lord's name in vain" was supposed to mean "not going on an unrightful campaign and claiming that it's done in the lord's name"
i aggree with that, doing something in the name of the lord means nothing if you go against god's word in order to do it.