Comic shop boycotts Action Comics for "taking the lords name in vain"

Recommended Videos

Stevepinto3

New member
Jun 4, 2009
585
0
0
I don't read comics, but is it ever implied anywhere what Superman's actual religious beliefs are? And yeah, "GD" sounds more like an implied grunt. This guy is all kinds of ridiculous for boycotting the books based on that.
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
FangShadow said:
Off-topic: I'm looking to start reading some dc comics...but the sheer amount of titles in the new 52 has left me confused as all hell. what comics should a person read if they want to have the full story on the justice league(normal, not international)?
Justice League. Thats it.

You don't need to read all of the issues about a character(s) to get a full story, their different stories at different times with the same characters. You can read Justice League and never read Flash, Green Lantern, Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman or Aquaman and you'll still get a full story. Hell, there isn't even a Cyborg book.

I can see where the confusion comes from. I mean Justice League is a team book so it's not really as much of a big deal but Superman has 2 books and Batman has 4. FOUR! That's beyond nuts, and that's not even counting team books (which I think puts him at 6 or 7). But they're all seperatte stories.

And the first few issues of Justice League are specifically designed for new readers, it'll explain all the characters and their powers.
 

twaddle

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,327
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
Did he even say "GD"? When I first glanced at it, I thought he said "go".
personallyi thought it was a sound effect from him being hit by the explosion. like how u say ugg, or oof. i thought he was groaning.
 

Snowblindblitz

New member
Apr 30, 2011
236
0
0
seniorsharptothetouch said:
I don't know what dumber... That ANYONE would be that offended or that Superman would resort to "geek speak" when taken by surprise.

What's next.. Omg, wtf, rotflol?
Basically. If it is that, I'm more bothered by Morrison using GD instead of saying it. Which is why I take it as a grunt, which implies this man searches for offense to his religion in any tiny area he can find it.

If this is true, Morrison, don't start using OMG WTF or anything. That would be terrible....
 

Doctor Glocktor

New member
Aug 1, 2009
802
0
0
I take the 'lords' name in vain all the time. I really don't see why I shouldn't, nor why anyone else would care about Superman saying it.
 

boyvirgo666

New member
May 12, 2009
371
0
0
WolfThomas said:
North Carolina Comic shop to receive unnecessary free publicity. I don't even see why it's a problem, it's realistic, people do take the lord's name in vain when in stressful situations, being shot by a tank is stressful.
Not for superman. For a situation to be stressful for superman i think it requires a deathray. I bet he cant get an erection without a time bomb being around.
 

Bobzer77

New member
May 14, 2008
717
0
0
It says more about the people getting worked up about a guy exercising the right to choose what he wants to stock in his shop than it does fundamentalist Christians.

I would admit they aren't the brightest bunch but that would be a wide sweeping generalization and why bother anyway?
 

ANImaniac89

New member
Apr 21, 2009
954
0
0
I thought that was just a sound effect like a grunt or something.
Honestly what bothered me about Action Comics 1 was Superman's glowing red eyes.

Christians need to lighten the fuck up, I grew up in a Christian household and still attend
church (granted I attend somewhat infrequently) But I still believe in the teaching and faith as well as try my hardest to live by something that resemble a moral code.

But MY GOD I'm so sick of every other week hearing about some new controversy that's got some of my more poorly educated brothers in faith up in arms. And its always the stupidest shit: Its implied that Superman used GD as an sigh of being in pain, Nerds like comics!?! clearly this is heresy, we must protest. I'm just so sick of it.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
xXxJessicaxXx said:
Yeah it kind of just makes the original story even more bizarre...how is he even running a comic book shop without being offended like this every single day.
Maybe he slips Chick Tracts into the issues so the kids discover them? I don't know.

I mean, comics strike me as harmless escapist fantasy and serial storytelling, but I'm not the one listening to records backwards for SATAN either.

I can see Christians being fine with owning a comic book shop, but I can't see anyone who is that fundamentalist doing it. Or anyone who is opposed to a "liberal" agenda. I mean, there are liberal Christians, too, unless he's applying the "No True Scotsman" fallacy (which would be funny, since he even named Morrison as a Scot).

And while I haven't regularly followed comics in years (Never outgrew them, just my other hobbies like music are REALLY expensive and time consuming), I have to wonder how he handled things like One More Day (Spider-Man makes a deal with Mephisto, the in-universe devil, which is out of character like he claims this slur is for Supes) or Civil War (Which seemed to have a pretty hardcore liberal bias). There are far worse comics out there.

And yeah, boycotting ALL Morrison comics for one panel. WOW.

I just....I don't know why this set him off so much.
 

Vivi22

New member
Aug 22, 2010
2,300
0
0
boyvirgo666 said:
WolfThomas said:
North Carolina Comic shop to receive unnecessary free publicity. I don't even see why it's a problem, it's realistic, people do take the lord's name in vain when in stressful situations, being shot by a tank is stressful.
Not for superman. For a situation to be stressful for superman i think it requires a deathray. I bet he cant get an erection without a time bomb being around.
The issue essentially establishes that not only is this him at the very start of his career as Superman, but he's much less powerful. He ends up walking away from that fight fairly bruised and beaten up.

But that's kind of beside the point. Morrison isn't the sort of writer who would shy away from simply writing god, or goddamn. And his current portrayal of this young Superman leads me to believe that Superman wouldn't have any problem saying it after getting shot by a tank either. Which leads me to believe this was nothing more than a grunt as he got hit by an exploding tank shell.

So basically, this guy is getting upset over nothing.
 

Dragonpit

New member
Nov 10, 2010
637
0
0
Oh, for crying out-

How did he get "God" out of that!? How would that have been in context with the situation!? Superman can take explosions! He would feel them, yes, but not so much that he would cry out like he was in pain or like he was having some weird orgasm!

Yet this nutjob is banning his comics. Because he misconstrued a grunt as blasphemy. I can't be the only one who thinks this picture is a little off kilter.
 

Jaime_Wolf

New member
Jul 17, 2009
1,194
0
0
It's pretty clear where he's coming from when he calls Grand Morrison a "liberal Scottish schmuck".

Tea Party shenangigans in my comic book store? It's more likely than you think.

(Edit: To be fair, it's pretty obvious why he got God out of Gd - it's a very, very common way of writing it to avoid offending people who think it's inappropriate to write down any name for God.)
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
SomeBritishDude said:
Basically Fundementalist Christian runs a comic book shop. Hilarity ensues.
Why isn't there a commandment against being an attention whore?

And threads like this don't help counter the whoring.

There is one way to react this, ignore him and anyone with common sense shouldn't use his stores (PS: this is not a call to boycott) then he realises there is such thing as bad publicity and gives up on this stunt.
 

HardkorSB

New member
Mar 18, 2010
1,477
0
0
SomeBritishDude said:
As some people may know, DC as just recently relaunched all their books at #1, including the longest running comic book ever Action Comics. Written by Grant Morrison this new interpritation of Superman is much closer to bolder, working mans hero, super jerk of his 1938 dabute, but that's not what's got this comic book guy rialed up.

Basically Fundementalist Christian runs a comic book shop. Hilarity ensues.

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/09/08/north-carolina-comic-shop-to-boycott-action-comics/

The funniest thing about it is Superman doesn't say "God". He says "GD" after being shot at by a tank. It could have just as easily been a grunt.

I suppose that he isn't selling "Thor" either since it's pagan propaganda and all that.
 

SomeBritishDude

New member
Nov 1, 2007
5,081
0
0
Dragonpit said:
How did he get "God" out of that!? How would that have been in context with the situation!? Superman can take explosions! He would feel them, yes, but not so much that he would cry out like he was in pain or like he was having some weird orgasm!
Well to be fair, this comic is actually set in Superman early days and all his powers arn't developed yet. He can't even fly yet. So when a tank shoots him he definitly feels it.

I mean the issue ends with him trying to stop a high speed train and he get's knocked the fuck out.
 

Xenos Eriadin

New member
Mar 11, 2009
72
0
0
WolfThomas said:
North Carolina Comic shop to receive unnecessary free publicity. I don't even see why it's a problem, it's realistic, people do take the lord's name in vain when in stressful situations, being shot by a tank is stressful.
I love how calmly you can say that. :D
It's like being shot by a tank is one of those little annoyances that Superman has to put up with, like sleeping through his alarm clock and being late for work.

OT: I didn't even people got pissed off by others saying "God!" I thought taking the lords name in vain was for saying stuff like "Jesus tap-dancing christ!" I could understand that being offensive to christians. But surely "Oh my God" or whatever is just one of those stock phrases that everyone says these days...
 

Realitycrash

New member
Dec 12, 2010
2,779
0
0
Hmmmm, well I think this is a silly place to draw the line, and religion shouldn't enter into it, but I do tend to agree that comics have been becoming FAR too left wing and need a bit more balance in perspective.
I'm sorry, how have they become "far too left wing", and how would you correct it?