Companies You are Currently Boycotting

Recommended Videos

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,365
3
43
WalMart and Wendy's.
I guess I should explain Wendy's...
about 5 years ago, I was coming back from a snowboarding trip and hadn't eaten in like a day. I had spent a bunch of money on the trip and used the cash I had left (6 dollars and change) on these new chicken strips they started serving at Wendy's. You spend over 6 dollars at a fast food place, you expect a good bit of food. Noooo. These things were tiny, like strips of strips. Only four of them and no side item. So I ate, had the whole trip back home hungry and never have eaten at Wendy's again.

All hail Chik-Fil-A! It's the only fast food place I go to now.
 

Tymathee

New member
Mar 25, 2009
20
0
0
Walmart - Target is just better imo.
SEGA - not really boycotting but their games are crap.
Blizzard - not really into their fantasy games.
K-Mart - Their stores suk.
Microsoft - For obvious reasons. For the non initiated, their games suk too and they're overpriced money whores.

can't think of anything else although im sure there are others.
 

Chrono212

Fluttershy has a mean K:DR
May 19, 2009
1,846
0
0
Cadbury for moving production of Creme Eggs to Poland...

...yeah...kinda lame but I haven't had a Creme Egg since about...last year :3

Oh, and it had nothing to do with my diet. Honest.
 

Jaded Scribe

New member
Mar 29, 2010
711
0
0
I won't play any Zynga games, but that's about it. I think about my purchases and go with whoever has the best quality/value ratio.

Boycotting never works, all of these companies have plenty of customers that a boycott means nothing for them.

All boycotting does is allow the boycotters to take on a holier-than-thou attitude about how awesome they are that they're boycotting .
 

Mr. Eff_v1legacy

New member
Aug 20, 2009
759
0
0
I have never bought anything from Apple. I wouldn't call it a boycott I just hate their advertising and have no use for anything of theirs.

However I am boycotting products from Holland (due to the trial of Geert Wilders), Poland (the trial of Adam Darski, AKA Nergal) and Mexico (because the country is overrun by drug cartels).
 

Ildecia

New member
Nov 8, 2009
671
0
0
1. Apple
2. Gamestop (except on release day)
3. Zynga
4. McDonalds
5. Burger King
6. Disney Channel (Dunno if this counts... but w/e)
7. World of Warcraft (just this part of blizzard, the rest is good.)
8. EA sports

yep. thats just about it
 

Marowit

New member
Nov 7, 2006
1,271
0
0
News Corp -

I am sure glad I already own the Star Wars movies, heh. Seriously though, I am a bit concerned how well I'll be able to avoid them, but Mr. Murdoch sealed the deal when he removed any pretenses about bias with his political contributions. /shrug may seem silly, but rhetoric is more poisonous to in my mind than walmart et al. in my opinion.

Apple -

After several years of enjoying their products their need for control came to a head when my itunes updated (automatically mind you) and deleted all of the music I had pulled off of other peoples machines on the network (I was on a dorm network). All my Miles Davis, and NiN disappeared 8( Plus, I can't stand planned obsolescence and the extent they push it to - eg being cheaper to buy a new ipod than replacing the headphone jack in my current one - that shit drives me nuts. Once my laptop dies I'll be replacing it with a non-apple product and be done with them totally.
 

quiet_samurai

New member
Apr 24, 2009
3,897
0
0
Tears of Blood said:
quiet_samurai said:
1. GOOGLE IT. Otherwise, have you never heard of the Boston Tea Party? Maybe the Nestle boycott? How often do you see Nestle products now? I hardly ever see them.

2. It's a process. No, my refusal to buy from a company does not hurt it, but if you spread the word and let people know WHY you do not buy from that company, then you are doing the right thing and it has a chance to succeed as long as everyone plays along. That includes YOU!

3. Okay, it's not quite that evil, but the quote is perfectly legit and works for this situation.

It's the reason that the world sucks right now. It's the attitude that everyone has that what they do doesn't matter. Nobody is willing to stand up for what they believe in, everyone's just willing to stand up for their wallets. If intelligent people were actually dedicated and they cared about what they believed in and were willing to do whatever they can about it, the world would be a better place.
1. Yes, but the tea party was because of taxation without represantation, tyranny from the crown, and unjust persecution from Britain. Not some company running itself within the legal limits of the law. And the Nestle thing... never heard of it. In fact most people have probably never heard of it, whose fault that is, I have no clue. But obviously it didn't do that much damage because I still see their products all the time... hell I have several of their products at my houe right now.

2. I'm glad you are sticking to what you believe in, really I am. But there comes a time when one should fight and a time when you should wait. Not only that, the matter in which you do it determines succes to varying degrees. Also the fact that most people have better things to worry about the the price of chocolate chips... really.

3. Sure you could use it, but it just seems a little melodramatic for the subject at hand.

And people have always thought the world sucked, even when it was doing fabulously there were still people around to complain about their lot in life, that's just how people are. Lots of big companies are not going to do business to everyones standard, but if the majority of their customer base didn't like it then they would most likely change how they operate, which as you can see time and time, again most companies have never done so because there is no reason for them to do it. And if you don't like it, then don't buy their product, simple as that. There is no need to start a movement for something that really at the end of the day does nothing more then cause a minor neusance.

And there is nothing wrong with people protecting their wallets, without your income you will not be able to live the life you do and most likley have to then use government sponsored programs or be on the street. It isn't necessarily their wallets they are defending, it's their pursuit of happiness, families, and their own livelihood they are concerned about.

Now don't get me wrong, if there was some very important concern that needed drastic and immediate action I would be right there with you. It's just that most boycotts are merely people bitching and whining over something that at the end of the day is something absolutely petty, or over something that didn't adhere to the exact specifications they wanted in a product. It just seems like people coming together complaining about not being given their own sense of self entitlement.
 

JackKevorkian

New member
Oct 6, 2010
1
0
0
I agree with OP, heres my list :

1. EA - Buys small companies, takes their game ideas, sells said games. Also, some games I have played which had an insane amount of bugs, this company doesnt care anymore its gotten so big,

2. Activision - No comment here.

3. Steam - Slows down PC, bad customer service.

4. Apple - Overpriced, pulling wool over customers eyes.

5. Star Wars Series - Too. Many. Games. (except battlefront)
 

Steve the Pocket

New member
Mar 30, 2009
1,649
0
0
Well, I had a big long post typed up and ready to post, and then I got a 404 and lost it all. SO I GUESS I'LL BE BOYCOTTING THE ESCAPIST NOW YOU EVIL MOTHERFUCKERS TRYING TO SUPPRESS THE TRUTH ha ha no just kidding. I don't mind retyping it all because I feel the people need to be informed. I'll just copypaste it into Notepad this time just in case...

Bayer - After some of their drugs were taken off the market in the US for being tainted with HIV in the '80s, knowingly resold these tainted drugs in Europe, infecting countless customers with the virus. Tried to cover up chemical explosions that are making countless people living near their factories dangerously ill. Continuing to sell pesticides that are known to cause birth defects if ingested. Probably more things.

Ubisoft - If you have to ask, you're on the wrong website.

Nabisco, Post, Kraft - Owned by Altria Group, nee Philip Morris, a tobacco company. Suppressed the facts about the dangers of tobacco back in the '50s. Continues to sell the single most dangerous legal product in America, even as countless prescription drugs get taken off the market for merely being "potentially" dangerous.

Netflix - Possibly the only legitimate company to still advertise in pop-up windows. Kind of a petty reason, but I draw the line at advertising that way. If I ever get confirmation that they've stopped, I will reconsider.

I'd also like to boycott every record label that's a member of the RIAA because of the frivolous lawsuits against random, innocent people, but I like non-indie music too much and I can't bring myself to pirate it. *sigh*

-----

Also, so many of you don't know what boycotting means. It does NOT mean not buying a company's products because you don't like them or even because they've personally screwed you over. Pretty much everyone does that. It's refusing to buy a company's products even if you're interested in them because they do things ? usually not even to you personally ? that you believe to be unethical or immoral and can't in good conscience support them with your money.
 

Tears of Blood

New member
Jul 7, 2009
946
0
0
quiet_samurai said:
Well, I agree with you for the most part in this post. However, I think the things that I mentioned, for the most part, matter. I care about the games industry, I don't care if a product is not quite the way I want it, they're able to make it however they like, but when it comes to certain things, I see it as a real, serious injustice, and as long as I think other people can see it too, then I will continue to talk about it and not be hypocritical by buying their stuff.

Just look at all the people on this site up in arms about Activision and Kotick. If we actually went out to our other gaming friends, told them about Activision and the shit they've pulled, and encouraged them to boycott as well that it wouldn't have any effect on them? I know they basically own WoW, but if there are enough of us, and we tell it to everyone we know, it can make a difference.

Perfect example: Langdell and his Edge thing. He was succeeding for years until we found out about it, and we ripped into him. The only difference now is that Activision is selling games to us, and we don't want to give them up because we like them.
 

Helmutye

New member
Sep 5, 2009
161
0
0
Chiquita Banana - they are the renamed successor to United Fruit Company, a very evil corporation that oppressed Guatemala and other Central American counties. They used their immense money to corrupt and run the government, destroyed any public projects that would threaten their monopolies, and kept the population in poverty for a long, long time. And then, when Guatemala finally got enough votes to challenge their dominance, they whined to the US government, who organized a coup, overthrew the democratically-elected government of Guatemala, and installed a brutal dictatorship. This happened back in the 50's, and since then United Fruit changed its name and transformed in Chiquita Banana, but while their name has changed, they are still just as bad as ever--they expose their workers to highly dangerous conditions and in 2007 were caught hiring Columbian paramilitary groups listed on the terrorist watch list for company security purposes (and probably to brutalize workers and competitors into submission). It seems strange that such nastiness would be involved with something like bananas, but it's all true.

BP - even before the gulf oil spill there was reason to boycott BP. In many ways, you could say that BP is responsible for the entire war on terror, or at least for creating many of the conditions that lead to it. Early in the 20th century a company known as the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) acquired an insanely one-sided contract with the nation of Iran, a contract that had been negotiated even longer ago with someone else entirely. As Iran developed, it became clear that the conditions of the contract were becoming very harmful to the good of the country and its people, especially since they found that AIOC was using "creative accounting" to transfer most of its profits to its holdings in other countries so that Iran received only a tiny fraction in exchange for use of its resources. Iran pressed AIOC to renegotiate a fair deal, and were repeatedly squeezed by oil embargoes and the withholding of oil royalties. Finally, the people of Iran elected a leader who vowed to nationalize Iran's oil drilling, ending the strangehold of AIOC. So AIOC, in actually a nationalized company itself, owned by the British government, convinced the US to sponsor a coup in Iran. Again, a democratically elected leader was overthrown, and a brutal dictator--the Shah--was installed and propped up, despite his notorious human rights violations and unpopularity. He allowed AIOC to continue to plunder Iran with impunity. He humiliated and exiled Iran's religious leaders, and basically gave the Iranian people two choices: live as an oppressed people under his boot (backed by the full might of the US military), or side with the only people mean and crazy enough to try to overthrow him despite his US backing--that is, side with Iran's extreme religious leaders (like Ayatollah Komeini). In the 70's, Iranians decided to side with the crazies to win freedom from the Shah's US sponsored oppression. That is why Iran hates the US, and Iran is one of the main reasons for the War on Terror. The coup happened in 1953. In 1954 AIOC changed its name to British Petroleum.

Bayer - after the US FDA denied them permission to sell HIV-tainted medical products in the US (the products were made from HIV and Hepatitis C tainted blood and were known to be infectious), they went ahead and sold them in a number of other countries, despite the fact that they knew this would infect any who used the products with HIV. Sure enough, tens of thousands of people were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C.
 

Rofl-Mayo

New member
Mar 11, 2010
643
0
0
I'm not really boycotting, but I guess I can call it that. Companies I am "boycotting" would be Apple and Xbox.
 

Tears of Blood

New member
Jul 7, 2009
946
0
0
Helmutye said:
Bayer - after the US FDA denied them permission to sell HIV-tainted medical products in the US (the products were made from HIV and Hepatitis C tainted blood and were known to be infectious), they went ahead and sold them in a number of other countries, despite the fact that they knew this would infect any who used the products with HIV. Sure enough, tens of thousands of people were infected with HIV and Hepatitis C.
Holy crap.

I need a link for that one, I almost don't believe it.
 

deckai

New member
Oct 26, 2009
280
0
0
Glademaster said:
A friend of mine found grass in a burger. Like grass from a field. Atleast it looked like field grass.
It's called Salad *g*


on-topic: Hm, there are only two companies i really boycott, EA and Ubisoft, mainly for their DRM and poor Customer support...

Years ago I refused to use steam, but thanks to some good cheap sales, I started to like it.
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
I don't actively boycott any companies. If I don't buy the products of a company, it's just because I have no use for them.