Conservapedia

Recommended Videos

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
smallharmlesskitten post=18.71419.723837 said:
Ooooh shiny! a cult!
The cult of skaro is an elite order of daleks, they think outside the box and even have names.

smallharmlesskitten post=18.71419.723852 said:
Apparently you can't be a liberal if you enjoy shooting
Of course not, why would you ever think otherwise?
 

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
dalek sec post=18.71419.723863 said:
smallharmlesskitten post=18.71419.723837 said:
Ooooh shiny! a cult!
The cult of skaro is an elite order of daleks, they think outside the box and even have names.
But, at the end of he day, Dalek Caan is the only one that's still alive.
 

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
dalek sec post=18.71419.723867 said:
Yeah but I thought he died at the end of season four though.
Gee, thanks. I'm Australian, so I haven't seen any episodes after "Midnight".

But, it proves my point even more.
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
Lord Krunk post=18.71419.723870 said:
dalek sec post=18.71419.723867 said:
Yeah but I thought he died at the end of season four though.
Gee, thanks. I'm Australian, so I haven't seen any episodes after "Midnight".

But, it proves my point even more.
*Bangs his head against his desk* Damnit, I'm sorry about that Krunk.
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
I'm just glad I didn't put anymore details and spolier's into my question.
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
Sorry about that, I'll try not to derail the thread again.

So, any idea on how we can remove people like those on conservapedia from power?
 

Alleged_Alec

New member
Sep 2, 2008
796
0
0
(warning, mildly expletive)
http://uploads.ungrounded.net/356000/356393_thisthread.swf

So, any idea on how we can remove people like those on conservapedia from power?
I think that nuking america is our best option.
 

dalek sec

Leader of the Cult of Skaro
Jul 20, 2008
10,237
0
0
Alleged_Alec post=18.71419.723928 said:
(warning, mildly expletive)
http://uploads.ungrounded.net/356000/356393_thisthread.swf

So, any idea on how we can remove people like those on conservapedia from power?
I think that nuking america is our best option.
I would be thumbs up for this but sadly I am from America.
 

poleboy

New member
May 19, 2008
1,026
0
0
smallharmlesskitten post=18.71419.723551 said:
conservapedia said:
lesbian women were 2.69 times more likely to be overweight and 2.47 times more likely to be obese than all other female sexual orientation groups.[3] The abstract for this study indicated that "lesbians are at greater risk for morbidity and mortality linked to overweight and obesity.
seriously.... wtf
Attention women of the world! Don't be gay! It will make you fat and unattractive! That's your biggest fear as a woman, right? RIGHT!?

Wow. That's fucked up.
 

Zeke109

New member
Jul 10, 2008
658
0
0
hmmm.....an online encyclopedia for paranoid christians. okay. just don't rip on wikipedia for being anti-american. I go there all of the time and not once have I seen anything REMOTELY anti-american.
 

Mathew952

New member
Feb 14, 2008
180
0
0
internutt post=18.71419.722878 said:
Wikipedia is not allowed to be used in Academic study. Should you list wikipedia as one of your sources in an essay you will be marked down heavily in most if not all Universities.

There are plenty of legitimate sources of information in libraries and other websites.
I mean, really, how much does a subscription to encarta cost? Wikipedia is good for obscure things like, Say, who was the boom operator in the movie spy hard. But other wise, the internet has so many more reliable sources.
 

Mathew952

New member
Feb 14, 2008
180
0
0
Eggo post=18.71419.723037 said:
As a Straussian neoconservative, I find everything a site like Conservapedia stands for to be alternatively appalling, terrifying, and depressing.
The whole Idea of having this specialized media seems very backward. So what, all the liberals will got to liberpedia, and the conservatives will have conservapedia, and the Conservatives will have fox, and the liberals will have CNN?

Doesn't it make much more sense to, say, provide opinion-free information, let people *gasp* READ THE FACTS, AND THINK, AND CREATE THEIR O W N OPINION?
No, this is america, I forgot.....
 

Mathew952

New member
Feb 14, 2008
180
0
0
dalek sec post=18.71419.723930 said:
Alleged_Alec post=18.71419.723928 said:
(warning, mildly expletive)
http://uploads.ungrounded.net/356000/356393_thisthread.swf

So, any idea on how we can remove people like those on conservapedia from power?
I think that nuking america is our best option.
I would be thumbs up for this but sadly I am from America.
Me too. Let's do a real life re-enactment of Executive orders.
 

Mathew952

New member
Feb 14, 2008
180
0
0
Taxi Driver post=18.71419.723216 said:
Well let?s see which one better explains a topic?

The one that gives in depth information on many, if not most of the aspects of evolution?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Or the one that speaks of evolution only in some crude attempt to associate it with evil, and incorrectness?

http://www.conservapedia.com/Evolution
That can't be real. That can't be real. Are people really that stupid? How is this possible? HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?
 

Grampy_bone

New member
Mar 12, 2008
797
0
0
The nature of Wikipedia allows users to edit articles. If the people who created Conservipedia felt that Wikipedia had inaccurate information on it, all they had to do was edit the pages and provide sources. The editing community sorts it out eventually. There are lots of classes and things where people do this all the time, submitting and researching new wikipedia articles.

But nooooo... they had to create their *own* site with their *own* rules where all of their lies are free from scrutiny. It should serve as a giant red flag to anyone that their 'History' was so skewed and biased they needed to create their own rip-off site just to post it.