Conservapedia

[BigKingBob]

As an editor at conservapedia (I mainly joined for the lulz) I feel obliged to tell you that it's even worse than it looks. The sysops and admins are so paranoid as to make McCarthy look rational, you get banned for asking questions such as "wasn't there a study out last year that proves both macro and microevolution," "hey, why is this obama article so crap" and "so dont conservatives lie aswell?"

The bloke that runs it is a nutjob of the worst kind, most of the sysops are bullies and idiots and the entire site seems to be based on the idea that YEC is scientifically sound.
Please, all of you, make accounts and go vandal crazy, they love the attention. No really do, as the sysops tend to just start banning people completely randomly when theres some vandalism, it hilarious.

For a good overview of the site go to www.rationalwiki.com and look at their "What's going on at Conservapedia?" section and the "Beginners guide to Conservapedia" both of them are funny as fuck

 

[Limasol]

Wait, did that guy from the vid claim the wikipedia was biased in an attempt to promote his own website...wait, he can't have, omg he did

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Sure, because taking the bible as the exact word of truth, including the frankly implausible beginning and the wacky, fire and brimstone revelations ending, not to mention the a-moral bullshit in between, then twisting everything else o be evil, of course that's not biased at all.

It's like battling a monster makes you become one (can't remember who said that). These people thought they were but it turned out they were the monsters all along.

 

[Rolling Thunder]

Well, since everyone else is busy shredding this site for it's advocation of destroying civil liberties, I have decieded to shred it myself:

Just under half of Britons accept the theory of evolution as the best description for the development of life, according to an opinion poll.

Because we are awesome. Learn from us, stupid people.

Grasse then points that bacteria are considered to have "stabilized a billion years ago

.

Okay, now I'm just fucking depressed. Good god, I'm sure all those people dying of MRSA are very happy to know that they are dying from a condition that does not exist.

believe that there are no inherent differences between men and women and that all inequality is the result of men oppressing women[4]
oppose chivalry and even feign insult at harmless displays of it
view traditional marriage as unacceptably patriarchal
shirk traditional gender activities, like baking[5]
support affirmative action for women
detest women who are happy in traditional roles, such as housewife,[6] and especially dislike those who defend such roles
prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do[7][8]
seek women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines
refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying[9]
refuse ever to admit that any part of feminist ideology is wrong

Oh dear god, I wish to cry. I really do: 'coed submarines'- WTF? What is wrong with you people!? WHat the fuck is a coed submarine!!?

""I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire."

Well, apart from the first part (initiated by the woman) I wholeheartedly, as a vicious, chauvinistic pig (which is what I am- and I like it) agree. Woman not want sex=Not having sex. T'be you're job, boyo, to make her want it.

And the rest is franly horseshit. Most of their quotes are rather like taking quotations from Mein Kampf and arguing that anyone of a right-wing bent is an insiduous threat to society-The facts support it, but only because I've picked the evidence.


And if anyone agrees with these scum. Please. Come. Forward.

You and I shall have words. Loud Words.

 

[Omnidum]

To see what Conservapedia [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia] is from RationalWiki, click the link. Quite fun, actually.

Also, they hate E.Coli bacteria [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Lenski_dialog]

 

[Random Argument Man]

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia Here's a better one.

 

[Anton P. Nym]

I would love to get into the Conservapedia and embed a MIDI of "Duelling Banjos" into their site background. Who knows, they might even like it.

-- Steve

 

[Alleged_Alec]

Another question asked, "Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?" Palin replied, "Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance."

I laughed really hard when I read that, for something like fifteen minutes. That bloody part wasn't added until like the 60's, because the government thought it'd stop those 'damn (atheist) communist bastards' from taking that pledge.

Also: this. http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Terri_Schiavo&curid=12138&diff=198091&oldid=170581

EDIT:

Atheists do not matter in world, so they should not matter or be allowed here. "To not believe in God is to not believe in the divinity of the human soul" as author CS Lewis put it. Atheists do not believe man is divine, just an animal. Animals cannot use the computer, so this is just what they want!!--Pakhyongshin 09:53, 19 August 2008 (EDT)

 

[Aries_Split]

It is time. Come brethren, we must perform the cleansing. In lord Mehrunes Dagon's name we shall take one, and spill his blood on the altar; opening the portal to Paradise, and unleashing Oblivion on these fool's souls....

 

[Limasol]

That quote fails to point out that describing us as animals is infinitely simpler to explain that to say that we were made here separately from all the other creatures by a rather implausible designer. Plus, souls don't exist.

 

[Aries_Split]

As a Buddhist, I believe that the idea of a soul, that is a constant, unchanging energy, is a load of bullocks.

 

[TheBadass]

If all the people on it were six, I'd find it so darn cute that they believe fairy tales like that. But, as it is...

Wow.

 

[Ares Tyr]

As a Straussian neoconservative, I find everything a site like Conservapedia stands for to be alternatively appalling, terrifying, and depressing.

May I ask what exactly a Straussian neoconservative is?

 

[Mistah Kurtz]

The fact that there are so Christians in the Republican party makes me want to vote for Obama sometimes.
Only sometimes though.

 

[BlueMage]

hmmm.....an online encyclopedia for paranoid christians. okay. just don't rip on wikipedia for being anti-american. I go there all of the time and not once have I seen anything REMOTELY anti-american.

Oh? You haven't seen all the colours? You don't know that using non-American spelling (ie, proper English) is anti-American?

Also, Conservapedia is still running? Shit. I know there are some folks on there who are genuinely trying to get unbiased information on the pages, but shit, they get drowned out by all the other retards.

EDiots can only make so many edits - most of these, you can be assured, come straight from the mind of Mr Schifely (or however the hell it's spelt)

 

[Aries_Split]

The fact that there are so Christians in the Republican party makes me want to vote for Obama sometimes.
Only sometimes though.

You mean you even consider voting for Mccain?
You unamerican fuck.

 

[BallPtPenTheif]

Wikipedia is not allowed to be used in Academic study. Should you list wikipedia as one of your sources in an essay you will be marked down heavily in most if not all Universities.

There are plenty of legitimate sources of information in libraries and other websites.

That's why you cite the citations from Wikipedia and not the Wikipedia page itself.

 

[meatloaf231]

The fact that there are so Christians in the Republican party makes me want to vote for Obama sometimes.
Only sometimes though.

You mean you even consider voting for Mccain?
You unamerican fuck.

People toss around the term "unamerican" so much. It has come to mean "any political standpoint other than my own."

 

[LewsTherin]

This was good for a laugh.

As a serious Christian, I lol'ed. Hard.

Honestly, they could be using their time for something more productive, and PLEASE don't use the terms American and Christian like they are conjoined at the hip. I mean, we must all be heathen bastards up here in Canada, as obviously all you down south are saints [/sarcasm]

 

[poleboy]

I would love to get into the Conservapedia and embed a MIDI of "Duelling Banjos" into their site background. Who knows, they might even like it.

-- Steve

Hey! Don't ruin good banjo by applying it to these nutters. It's a fine song, even if it does bring up some disturbing memories...