Could America be invaded?
- Thread starter Zombie Badger
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Best laid plan iv seen so far, anyway whats air space gotta do with submarines? or indeed fighter jets? and anti nationalist propaganda wouldnt be hard. americans seem to relish turning their fellow americans on their own government, and ther amateurs. If we used proffesional propaganda specialists it wdnt be tht hard, especially considering ur average redneck has an iq sumwhere between 2 and 3.mkg said:Lol...What? Where to begin....cainstwin said:ur ideas are meh. I reckon it can be done. What i'd do is use a spy organisation (doesnt matter which 1) to turn million of gun totting red necks on their own country. Wouldn't be that hard. There goes ur resisitance and som of the army. and then i use our lil nuclear sub to nuke certain politicly key regions, some military strongholds and etc, no-one would no who fired it, its a sub. missiles from the sea dont have obvious nationalities, and the nukes arent gonna have GB flags on the side. That would be dumb. If i wanted to distract the sates i could publicly blame russia, there not gonna check, and theyl probably nuke it to smithereens which will nicely dispose of them. After the russian retaliations il probably just be able to stroll in and put a flag down. Job done
1. That is a hardcore "spy organisation" (doesn't matter which 1 of course), red neck republicans fighting the united states army. Genius.
2. You couldn't fly a cisna within a mile of a US air base or restricted air space without F18s up your ass so your "lil nuclear sub" must be as equally made of win as your "spy organisation" (whichever 1 we're going with of course) to just mosy over to the US shoreline and let loose it's stealth untrackable nukes to all our "Strongholds" and "polticly key regions?"
3. We've definately been waiting for anyone to blame russia for destroying our strongholds for years. We totally don't check dude. Considered them good as smithereened...
4. And who could really mount ANY sort of defensive when your flag is down. I mean...there it is! We did it in that one statue right? Has to work.
I know you're playing man, but that really did make me laugh that was good.
u have a better plan, tell me 
Wow you WERE serious! LOL! Here's a plan, never join the armed forces, just use your 1337 HaX0RZ to coordinate world domination.cainstwin said:Best laid plan iv seen so far, anyway whats air space gotta do with submarines? or indeed fighter jets? and anti nationalist propaganda wouldnt be hard. americans seem to relish turning their fellow americans on their own government, and ther amateurs. If we used proffesional propaganda specialists it wdnt be tht hard, especially considering ur average redneck has an iq sumwhere between 2 and 3.mkg said:Lol...What? Where to begin....cainstwin said:ur ideas are meh. I reckon it can be done. What i'd do is use a spy organisation (doesnt matter which 1) to turn million of gun totting red necks on their own country. Wouldn't be that hard. There goes ur resisitance and som of the army. and then i use our lil nuclear sub to nuke certain politicly key regions, some military strongholds and etc, no-one would no who fired it, its a sub. missiles from the sea dont have obvious nationalities, and the nukes arent gonna have GB flags on the side. That would be dumb. If i wanted to distract the sates i could publicly blame russia, there not gonna check, and theyl probably nuke it to smithereens which will nicely dispose of them. After the russian retaliations il probably just be able to stroll in and put a flag down. Job done
1. That is a hardcore "spy organisation" (doesn't matter which 1 of course), red neck republicans fighting the united states army. Genius.
2. You couldn't fly a cisna within a mile of a US air base or restricted air space without F18s up your ass so your "lil nuclear sub" must be as equally made of win as your "spy organisation" (whichever 1 we're going with of course) to just mosy over to the US shoreline and let loose it's stealth untrackable nukes to all our "Strongholds" and "polticly key regions?"
3. We've definately been waiting for anyone to blame russia for destroying our strongholds for years. We totally don't check dude. Considered them good as smithereened...
4. And who could really mount ANY sort of defensive when your flag is down. I mean...there it is! We did it in that one statue right? Has to work.
I know you're playing man, but that really did make me laugh that was good.
This is true. I know enough people with guns in their homes ready to fight if the "commies attack us tonight" [sic]Zombie Badger said:
Some of my friends fantasize about it, playing games like ''freedom fighters'' and such, and even though many of us disagree with our government and our leaders, it is because we love America for what it was/is truly supposed to be.
Long story short, yes, our military is currently quite good and all, but even if we were faced with an occupation, you'd be right to be that some of us would fight fanatically to the last man. Crazy patriots, eh?
If i was serious id have included all my other extras to the idea. Ive been planning my world domination for years, and god knows iv got nothing better 2 do at college.mkg said:Wow you WERE serious! LOL! Here's a plan, never join the armed forces, just use your 1337 HaX0RZ to coordinate world domination.cainstwin said:Best laid plan iv seen so far, anyway whats air space gotta do with submarines? or indeed fighter jets? and anti nationalist propaganda wouldnt be hard. americans seem to relish turning their fellow americans on their own government, and ther amateurs. If we used proffesional propaganda specialists it wdnt be tht hard, especially considering ur average redneck has an iq sumwhere between 2 and 3.mkg said:Lol...What? Where to begin....cainstwin said:ur ideas are meh. I reckon it can be done. What i'd do is use a spy organisation (doesnt matter which 1) to turn million of gun totting red necks on their own country. Wouldn't be that hard. There goes ur resisitance and som of the army. and then i use our lil nuclear sub to nuke certain politicly key regions, some military strongholds and etc, no-one would no who fired it, its a sub. missiles from the sea dont have obvious nationalities, and the nukes arent gonna have GB flags on the side. That would be dumb. If i wanted to distract the sates i could publicly blame russia, there not gonna check, and theyl probably nuke it to smithereens which will nicely dispose of them. After the russian retaliations il probably just be able to stroll in and put a flag down. Job done
1. That is a hardcore "spy organisation" (doesn't matter which 1 of course), red neck republicans fighting the united states army. Genius.
2. You couldn't fly a cisna within a mile of a US air base or restricted air space without F18s up your ass so your "lil nuclear sub" must be as equally made of win as your "spy organisation" (whichever 1 we're going with of course) to just mosy over to the US shoreline and let loose it's stealth untrackable nukes to all our "Strongholds" and "polticly key regions?"
3. We've definately been waiting for anyone to blame russia for destroying our strongholds for years. We totally don't check dude. Considered them good as smithereened...
4. And who could really mount ANY sort of defensive when your flag is down. I mean...there it is! We did it in that one statue right? Has to work.
I know you're playing man, but that really did make me laugh that was good.
It could be invaded, it would be a very short and not very effective invasion but it would still count.
But honestly invasions are out of style nowadays. Now people just wave nukes around like toys and everyone backs off.
But honestly invasions are out of style nowadays. Now people just wave nukes around like toys and everyone backs off.
I'm surprised that no-one has commented on the EM Pulse generated from nukes... Several large nukes detonated in the upper atmosphere and spread out over the US would basically fuck up any electronic device more complicated than a torch (unless it's properly defended against such an attack) over the most of the US mainland.
Yes, a large chunk of the US armed forces would still have communications, but pretty much all of the civilian population would have next to no idea what the hell was happening. What happens then? Mass panic, riots, looting.
The invading force would still have a hell of a fight on their hands, but the fewer nukes could do a similar amount of damage without irradiating half of the US.
Yes, a large chunk of the US armed forces would still have communications, but pretty much all of the civilian population would have next to no idea what the hell was happening. What happens then? Mass panic, riots, looting.
The invading force would still have a hell of a fight on their hands, but the fewer nukes could do a similar amount of damage without irradiating half of the US.
Yeah, like 200 years ago when our army sucked. Plus, didn't we repel the British back to Canada? I know they got to the white house and attempted to burn it down but failed since it started to rain, but I'm pretty sure Andrew Jackson's forces were able to drive them back. So there was an attempted invasion, but it failed.Flying-Emu said:
I could beat them single handedly lol
On a serious note, anywhere can be invaded. Just need a group of people/countries with the right motivation.
Also you say the size of america would be a problem... Much of it's infastucture and population is on the east and west coast... So a very good naval force could do pretty well. The inner states wouldnt be able to help much and landing forces would then penetrate into America without much resistance as most of the command/industry and population had been overunn.
But saying this you'd need a group of countries to be strong enough to attempt this, and all the ones capable at the moment all seem to be on pretty good terms with the US. The only countries that could really threaten them are Russia and China but I'd say you're on pretty good terms with them
Your biggest threat is the UK - we're plotting your downfall with a super-powered nuclear soldiers that run on a type of fusion using tea and crumpetsbut shhh! dont tell no one!
lolOn a serious note, anywhere can be invaded. Just need a group of people/countries with the right motivation.
Also you say the size of america would be a problem... Much of it's infastucture and population is on the east and west coast... So a very good naval force could do pretty well. The inner states wouldnt be able to help much and landing forces would then penetrate into America without much resistance as most of the command/industry and population had been overunn.
But saying this you'd need a group of countries to be strong enough to attempt this, and all the ones capable at the moment all seem to be on pretty good terms with the US. The only countries that could really threaten them are Russia and China but I'd say you're on pretty good terms with them
Your biggest threat is the UK - we're plotting your downfall with a super-powered nuclear soldiers that run on a type of fusion using tea and crumpets
but shhh! dont tell no one!
That; and occupation forces are expensive. However you dont necessarily need to have a huge army to invade the US.... or any other nation for that matter.
Lets say for instance you use chemical or biological weapons. Or you wipe out major roads, airports and seaports. A united States that is alone and without any means to import and distribute food will likely have many of those gun toting Americans using their weapons against OTHER Americans.
Even WITH food relief and emergency housing, weren't there cases of gun owners shooting people in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina?
Alot of Americans who buy guns are people who purchase them with the the thought of "To defend thyself and thy home" ... not to "defend thy nation".
If Americans bought guns to "defend thy Nation", they'd logically probably be in the army or retired. Worse still, if these people we're kicked out of the army, or didn't meet it's standards to begin with.
So you take a confused American (as would any person in any nation that had had it's/some major population centres, seaports, airports, or major institutions gased/bombed/virus bombed) ... how likely is it he's going to be shooting other Americans in the confusion?
Think about it for a second ... if you've bought a gun for protection, and everybody is looting ... and other people are shooting (possibly at you) ... are you going to shoot back, or try to reason with them?
You'll eventually get hungry, everybody has looted the best stuff, you're running out of bullets. In a matter of a month or two, you could be looking at 60-70% casualties in many states.
To attack the US you wouldn't need nukes ... all you need to do is cause hysteria. The US couldn't ever justify nuking every other country. Most OECD nations have SM, or MS, whatever rocket systems to help aid in long ranged ballistic missile defence anyways. So a long-ranged assault wouldn't do any good ... and thats even if you knew which nation is attacking you to begin with viral weaponry?
"Was it the Chinese?... was it the Russians?... could it be terrorists that managed to get their hands on stolen Cold War tech and managed to deliver it into the country?"
If you started blind firing nukes, most would be ineffectual, and then most nations would strike back. The world could potentially become a very scary place @.@
Lets say for instance you use chemical or biological weapons. Or you wipe out major roads, airports and seaports. A united States that is alone and without any means to import and distribute food will likely have many of those gun toting Americans using their weapons against OTHER Americans.
Even WITH food relief and emergency housing, weren't there cases of gun owners shooting people in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina?
Alot of Americans who buy guns are people who purchase them with the the thought of "To defend thyself and thy home" ... not to "defend thy nation".
If Americans bought guns to "defend thy Nation", they'd logically probably be in the army or retired. Worse still, if these people we're kicked out of the army, or didn't meet it's standards to begin with.
So you take a confused American (as would any person in any nation that had had it's/some major population centres, seaports, airports, or major institutions gased/bombed/virus bombed) ... how likely is it he's going to be shooting other Americans in the confusion?
Think about it for a second ... if you've bought a gun for protection, and everybody is looting ... and other people are shooting (possibly at you) ... are you going to shoot back, or try to reason with them?
You'll eventually get hungry, everybody has looted the best stuff, you're running out of bullets. In a matter of a month or two, you could be looking at 60-70% casualties in many states.
To attack the US you wouldn't need nukes ... all you need to do is cause hysteria. The US couldn't ever justify nuking every other country. Most OECD nations have SM, or MS, whatever rocket systems to help aid in long ranged ballistic missile defence anyways. So a long-ranged assault wouldn't do any good ... and thats even if you knew which nation is attacking you to begin with viral weaponry?
"Was it the Chinese?... was it the Russians?... could it be terrorists that managed to get their hands on stolen Cold War tech and managed to deliver it into the country?"
If you started blind firing nukes, most would be ineffectual, and then most nations would strike back. The world could potentially become a very scary place @.@