zpm4737 said:
ace_of_something said:
zpm4737 said:
Kukulski said:
zpm4737 said:
Kukulski said:
Some fans of really old music might hate me for that, but for me if the covered track was written before 1960 then the cover becomes the original.
That's just factually untrue.
Yea it is, but what I meant to say is that I don't really care if a song by Led Zeppelin or Deep Purple was written by some 1930s blues artist. The original is likely worse, less interesting and barely audible compared to the cover.
That's ridiculous. Just because a song is old, and is from a genre you don't like, that doesn't mean it's bad. Refusing to acknowledge our previous influences and the influences of our influences is a path down mediocrity.
If you don't like a genre how could you recognize it as good?
I don't like hiphop generally ergo, I have no idea what is a good hiphop song and what is a bad one.
Music is subjective. So saying that one kind of music is good and one is bad is baseless. It's entirely based on taste. There is no good music or bad music. Just music you like and don't like.
So lemme keep up with the conversation thus far... one guy said "i don't care about older songs" you ask him to elaborate and he gives his opinion. Then you tell him that's not the right way to think. I say if you don't like a genre how can you expect someone to make a personal judgment call on it.
Then you tell me 'well it's all opinion'
Yeah, dude sounds to me like you just want to disagree with people.