Matthew94 said:
I do read the articles.
I have to say though, the quality of the articles has declined.
I disagree. Cracked is, and has been as long as I've been reading, very hit-and-miss. Seanbaby is hilarious when he does a comic, less so when he doesn't. Soren makes me laugh in After Hours but I don't enjoy his columns. Bucholz is hilarious all the time, but his Unlikely Advice columns always have me in stitches. The point is that, as with any site that has user-submitted content, the pendulum of quality swings all over the damn place, and when it comes to columnists everyone has their own tastes. When they're putting out a consistent 3/4 articles a day plus videos, photoshop contests and Quick Fixes, it's worth putting up with 3 'meh' articles for one that genuinely amuses.
Matthew94 said:
Most aren't funny anymore and if you skip to the comments it's just tons of posts about how most of what they write is just wrong.
See, you and I have very different views on the comment section. I see a lot of people quoting the article as if repeating a joke they just heard makes them funny by extension, a lot of people trolling, and a
metric fuckton of spambots. Or, worse, the people who think they're hilarious by responding to spambots. Sure, you do get the occasional pedant claiming that the article is badly researched, but do you ever actually
read those posts? hell, I'm thicker than a brick sandwich and sometimes
I can prove the "corrections" wrong.