fix-the-spade said:Really? i found warhead ran worse on my rig then the original. (with all settings cranked right up on dx9. and with the little hacks for some of the dx10 stuff on xp for the original)Wolfram01 said:With any luck they'll get the optimisations right for a wider range of PC's than Crysis, Warhead was better, so there's hope.
thats concept art, not an in game screenshot. these are in game/engine shots and not concept art so likely yes, that is what the game looks like. they are promo shots, but they are in game as well.Scrumpmonkey said:Reminds me of this;
![]()
Crysis 1 didn't look THAY good. They are obviously "Promo shots"
ce2 was very badly unoptimized, there are several mods out there that make the game run much better without any visual hits, similar to the operation optimization mod for oblivion. if ce3 is better optimized than it might have lower requirements than crysis.Robyrt said:Largely theoretical for me, anyway. Unless Crytek pulls a Chris Taylor and makes Crysis 2 have LOWER system requirements, I won't be able to play it at all - I have to turn the dial on Crysis 1 down to 1280x720 to get a decent frame rate.
For those of us whose PCs cost under $1000US, I'll take the blocky but functional Supreme Commander 2 over the shiny but imaginary Crysis.
MAXIMUM SEXY.minxamo said:I'd appreciate it more if the armour was less.... revealing?
metal bulge makes my homophobic self uncomfortable.
That is confirmed. It will be on 360, PS3, and PC.Phenom828 said:I actually think it's going to be on consoles as well. (I mean a PS3 basically IS a hypothetical super computer from space : )