You're right, of course. I haven't seen the competitive play, and there have been changes to the formula here and there. But I think a complete overhaul of the gameplay in the same setting could be fun, because there's still a lot of untapped potential.TerranReaper said:You haven't seen that much if you think the formula has zero changes to it or have seen the competitive scene to it. I rather not get into detail but just saying.Arjen Swellengrebel said:Pokemon, I think. The games were good when they were new, but taking a formula with so much potential and making exactly zero changes to it is a terrible waste. I'd be all over a Pokemon game where you could create teams of Pokemon that complement each other, or if they made it a turn-based strategy game or something. Why would you make a game with over 400 playable characters, and limit you to using one at a time? It just doesn't make sense to me.
And yes, the Mystery Dungeon and Ranger series kind of try that out, but they're just kinda shitty...