Fieldy409 said:
Also they had the nerve to name one of their boats after Steve Irwin but only after he died.
His wife supported it because she said that he would have liked it. He was planning to go on a trip with them when he died. Article [http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/irwin-honoured-by-anti-whalers/story-e6frg12c-1111115037765]
***
Blablahb said:
ninonybox360 said:
Stupidity
"herp derp lets drive our little fiberglass bat boat in front of a 100,000 ton ship, that will show them!"
Well, that's what you do if you want to stop a boat. Little did they know the whalers are willing to commit murder. Why don't you get angry about that. Wanting to murder several people just to save a few yen in profits from illegal criminal activities is pretty shocking.
If anything it's more than a little heroic they did that, even if they knew from previous experiences the whalers will injure or try to murder people who get in their way.
ninonybox360 said:
Won't make up there damned minds
In said boat crash they requested help from the ship they just drove in front of, the whalers where uneasy about going over (more likely a language problem), they did stop however.
Yeah, according to the whalers. In reality however they aimed watercannons at the survivors in the wreck to try and force them into the freezing sea so they wouldn't survive for certain.
Where on earth do you get your info? www.kantei.go.jp ?
evilneko said:
I also love how Blah ignores that the collision with the Ady Gil was entirely Sea Shepherd's fault.
I thought I'd put your response to Blablahb's comment next to it for reference since you didn't quote. In answer:
They were BOTH to blame. It was a big game of chicken and neither of them turned. I'm on the side of Shepherd, you favour the whalers. It doesn't change the fact that neither of them turned to prevent a crash. So don't try and portray the whalers as being angelic, especially when it's been all but proved that on another occasion they purposefully got in the way a Greenpeace ship that was trying to reverse (they aren't as extreme as Sea Shepherd). Here is the video [http://www.icrwhale.org/eng/GPAS2.mpg], and Greenpeace's analysis [http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/oceans/whaling/antarctic-whaling/ramming/], which seems pretty sound. I'd be interested to see if you have any problems with it?
***
Ultratwinkie said:
Wicky_42 said:
OneCatch said:
I'm no veggie but I at least like to think I have a little compassion and morality. I am very pleased that battery farms are being outlawed in the UK, and that fox hunting has gone, and as you say, not only is whaling barbaric and endangering species, it's almost completely unnecessary for a first world country and there's little demand for the product. It's completely retarded to exterminate some of the most majestic species on the planet for no other reason that "cos we can".
Now, I can't comment on the methods used or the show, but activists do what they've gotta do. It takes action to stop people doing bad things, and from the posts here at least they're better at it than Green Peace!
How is it endangering species? The Japanese only hunted the Minke whale for centuries. They are not endangered and are ranked the same as pigs, chickens, and cows. It wasn't until they had to "research" whales did they go after the rare whales. However, the majority is still Minke.
Yes, but they still go after endangered species too, and they always have done as well [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_whaling#Organized_whaling]. Don't have a go at Heimir for not doing research when you haven't even checked yours in the same post!
Anyway, even if you were right, your argument is like saying: "It's fine, they hunt antelope 95% of the time [small]and then kill an elephant[/small] but MOST of it is antelope so it's fine!" Which is a bit silly.
Ultratwinkie said:
Heimir said:
While whaling should be illegalized as it has no reaso to exist at all. Nobody eats whale nor dolphins. The japanese don't. Whaling should be globally illegal. But those cuntbags are not fighting for a cause they're just whoring to get view ratings and to look cool and get famous by being complete dolts while breaking international law. I want whaling to stop, but that's not the way to go about it. The Cove was a step in the right direction but the people on the Bird of Prey will just make people go against the anti-whaling folks out of annoyance and frustration. They're really just harming their own cause.
Look up. Also the Japanese do eat whales and dolphins.
Yes they do. Dolphins aren't endangered, which means it is slightly less objectionable (though I still hate it).
But whale meat is not that popular in Japan, certainly not popular enough to warrant the size of the hunt operation. That's why the Japanese government has had to
subsidise it to the tune of $12 million just to break even in 2008-2009 (and $150 million since 1988).
Because no one really likes whale meat, the Japanese government have started feeding it to schoolkids and dogs [http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/whale-meat-used-for-dog-food/story-e6frg6t6-1111115171833] as an attempt to make it more popular, in spite of it containing too much mercury (and other fun chemicals [http://www.hsi.org/issues/whaling/facts/human_health_concerns_of_whale_meat.html]) to be safe for children to eat. The argument that it's a popular national dish is just crap.
Like I said before, it's just the Japanese government being bloody minded, and then trying to justify their position by trying to hide the veritable mountain of whale meat that no-one fucking wants.