Are you kidding me? 3D is gimmicky garbage that adds absolutely nothing to the film, and in some cases takes away from it because you have a headache or it just plain looks bad.
And its one hero vs several.irishda said:Just read this interesting article on yahoo.
Essentially Dark Knight won't be able to top Avengers because Nolan hates the 3D format. Since 3D tickets are more expensive, DKR will be hard pressed to try and top the ticket sales with a strictly cheaper price. It'll be harder still because the Avengers "saturday morning cartoon" style endeared it to younger audiences, with the action and dialogue being good enough to entertain the older audiences. Meanwhile, Dark Knight's darker tone and de-emphasis on the fighting make it less fun for the younger kids.
Personally, it doesn't matter to me how much less money Dark Knight makes. I like what Nolan is doing to eliminate some of the staler tropes of the comic movie genre. I'm not saying Avengers isn't a good movie, I just respect the people who do something different more, and I share Nolan's hatred of the 3d format.
You were going to go to the film to see the sales of it? You don't make a lot of sense.SpaceBat said:That's basically the only reason I was planning on watching DKR, not because it might once again be one of the greatest superhero movies ever (Dark Knight completely destroys Avengers and is only rivaled by V for Vendetta in my opinion). Canceling my tickets now, damn it.
Have fun watching your possibly excellent movie that isn't going to top avenger sales, LOL.
Points for him, then.irishda said:Essentially Dark Knight won't be able to top Avengers because Nolan hates the 3D format.
I know that sarcasm doesn't translate well over the Internet, but I refuse to believe that you didn't pick up on that.Saucycarpdog said:You were going to go to the film to see the sales of it? You don't make a lot of sense.
Pretty much the perfect reply.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:snip
13 movies, a TV series, and 3 decades to gather a fan base. If they made another animated film with a theatrical release, of course it would sell well. Hell, I'd probably go see it.MoNKeyYy said:Not sure that's an apt comparison. By the same token, Ice Age 4 should do better than the latest batman by virtue of being a fourth installment. Well, maybe that's a poor comparison. Better example; another Land Before Time movie should do much, much better than Ice Age 4 due to beign an x-billionth installment.
This happens when any Marvel or DC movie is released close together. I remember the popular trolling method and how some people believed that Avengers was going to flop John Carter style.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:Seriously, are people's memories that short?
The Dark Knight grossed over a billion at the box office when it came out.
This is not some story of the underdog going up against the unstoppable might of the Avengers. The Dark Knight already broke box office records when it came out. There's no reason Rises couldn't do the same. The hype for this film has, quite frankly, been unlike anything else in recent times. The Dark Knight was released on the strength of a well received film in Batman Begins. Rises is being released on the strength of arguably the most criticaly acclaimed superhero film in history with The Dark Knight.
People said exactly the same when Iron Man came out. "Oh, Marvel have released a film that's full of fun and comic-book goodness. This is the superhero film of the year. There's no way TDK will be able to top it." Then TDK actually came out, and blew everyone away. By the end of the summer, nobody would shut up about it, and Iron Man had already been forgotten in the collective conscious.
Did Avengers gross a lot? Yes it did. Did it gross a huge amount more than the last Batman film? No it didn't. The Dark Knight grossed $1 billion. The Avengers grossed $1.4 billion. There's no reason, with the current levels of unbelievable hype and the great reviews the film has already been getting, that TDKR couldn't top that figure. It may not, of course, but there's no reason to stop it from doing so. Sequels to spectacularly successful films nearly always open spectacularly themselves. If they're good, they continue that success. It's the reason Modern Warfare 2 trumped Modern Warfare, and why Black Ops trumped MW2.
And at the end of the day, who fucking cares? If it's going to be a great film, then it will be a great film regardless of how well it does at the box office. Blade Runner tanked at the box office. Doesn't stop it being one of the greatest sci-fi films ever.
Well there's the contradiction:WolfThomas said:I'm not sure I agree with this part of OP. I think a multi-movie project, that's tonally faithful to the comics keeping bright costumes and over the top concepts is just as innovate and refreshing as another grim serious Batman movie. But don't get me wrong, I love both.irishda said:I just respect the people who do something different more
It's not really new to stay faithful to a comic book style, but the problem is there's a lot of camp and absurdity in comics that may seem cool on page but doesn't translate well into live action. For instance, Hawkeye was already kind of a useless character (not interested in debating this, because I know a ton of people are gonna rise up to defend him based on previous threads) in comparison to the other heroes. Now add the strange costume he had and it really just makes him seem like a crazy person Nick Fury lets wander around. Or inconsistencies in powers and strengths, like Hulk flooring a giant robot dragon 3 blocks long, but just knocking Thor and Loki about without outright killing them.tonally faithful to the comics keeping bright costumes/over the top concepts is just as innovative
Joseph Alexander said:i dont think thats fair , i had no idea who he was or that he was dead when i got around to watching it and i thought it was the joker show.HardkorSB said:.
and lets be honest, TDK was as big as it was CAUSE od heath's death, not the actual movie or his performance.
the fact he died afterwards and people clomped onto that.
it was really nice and to my mind the first time ever done right to see a villain portrayed that way. Lets be honest morgan is phoning it in, 2 face is bending the rules and the guy playing batman is at best average. so really theres just Alfred left to carry the movie and its just not going to happen is it.
Rises is going to struggle to be as good as begins with whats left imo and thats an average film at best.
More like less pretentious grimdark, more fun. Superhero ovies don't have to try to be Citizen Kane. Because we already HAVE Citizen Kane.bafrali said:So we can look forward to more crossovers that is a product of four different film series? Doesn't seem likely to meAxolotl said:Because the films that do well in the box office are the ones that set the trends for future films to follow.bafrali said:Why are you comparing box office performances? Does it have something to do with quality or something? Or are you one of the shareholders?