Dead Children and someone's not giving a s#!t...

Recommended Videos

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
Singularly Datarific said:
ANTI-SANTA said:
Thats fucked, why do they keep cutting back on proper emergancy exists?
To quote some rich bank person boffin,"Holes in the walls cost money!"
Basically they didn't mean any harm by that, the owners. They just figured it would be cheaper. Never in their heads did it occur to them that something bad might happen, and fucking the regulations meant more money on their pocket. Period.
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
Safety regulations are born every time there is a massive, high profile disaster in a country. Mexico seems to be a bit backward in this respect. There will be little restitution, but if the nation is actually not retarded, the people will act on the government, and the government will put together some sort of building codes.

Nightclub disasters are what led to the multiple exits and the "don't build stages with pyrotechnics out of paper mache" laws
 

GRoXERs

New member
Feb 4, 2009
749
0
0
The system could work. Really, it could - but for human fallibility.

Just as people feel terrible when little kids die, those in power also feel a very real need to benefit family members to the exclusion of others who may be more qualified to, say, build and run a daycare. Now, I'm not saying that this happens in Mexico any more than anywhere else, I'm just saying that it's hardly the system's fault. It is purely the fault of a) those in power who allowed shit like this to happen, b) the media for failing to notice what was going down in the daycare business, and c) the parents for not noticing that there weren't any emergency exits.

Now, I realize (and sympathize with) the fact that there was almost certainly no other options daycare-wise here for the parents, but come on - if you notice there aren't any emergency exits, and you fail to complain vocally enough to get it changed, (or if you don't even take the time to make sure there are emergency exits) you can't be this surprised when something bad happens.

As to the feelings people have for small children dying, it's a natural part of the social instinct humans have - it's perfectly beneficial evolutionarily, and if y'all want to know why, PM me and I'll tell you. This post is long enough as it is.
 

Avatar Roku

New member
Jul 9, 2008
6,169
0
0
thiosk said:
Safety regulations are born every time there is a massive, high profile disaster in a country. Mexico seems to be a bit backward in this respect. There will be little restitution, but if the nation is actually not retarded, the people will act on the government, and the government will put together some sort of building codes.

Nightclub disasters are what led to the multiple exits and the "don't build stages with pyrotechnics out of paper mache" laws
My impression was that the regs are there, but nobody follows them, and they can get away with that through connections.

OT:Christ, that's horrible. And not just the tragedy itself, but also the government's reaction. Death toll of 47 and they can't even pretend to give a fuck?
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
When there Regulations being broken
And fires blazing
People dieing
Who you gonna call
Ghostbu OSHA!!!

Sorry, too much of that new game!!
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
Mexico does not exactly have a reputation as a bastion of wisdom and acumen.

pimppeter2 said:
When there Regulations being broken
And fires blazing
People dieing
Who you gonna call
Ghostbu OSHA!!!

Sorry, too much of that new game!!
seriously, right? I've been humming the tune for the past four days, CONSTANTLY.

also gb2 is just finishing up on amc...
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
GRoXERs said:
The system could work. Really, it could - but for human fallibility.

Just as people feel terrible when little kids die, those in power also feel a very real need to benefit family members to the exclusion of others who may be more qualified to, say, build and run a daycare. Now, I'm not saying that this happens in Mexico any more than anywhere else, I'm just saying that it's hardly the system's fault. It is purely the fault of a) those in power who allowed shit like this to happen, b) the media for failing to notice what was going down in the daycare business, and c) the parents for not noticing that there weren't any emergency exits.

Now, I realize (and sympathize with) the fact that there was almost certainly no other options daycare-wise here for the parents, but come on - if you notice there aren't any emergency exits, and you fail to complain vocally enough to get it changed, (or if you don't even take the time to make sure there are emergency exits) you can't be this surprised when something bad happens.
First, it is the system's fault, because it was put forth there by people wishing for something to exploit. That's how things are done in here.

And, I'm aware that accidents because of negligence may not happen in Mexico more than in anywhere else, but the may because here people are way, way more negligent than in other countries. And also, here, is one of those places where the government just ignores you. For real.

As for the parents...man, I don't even know where to begin: Look, you are not in a third world country so you probably don't have a clue, and trust me when I tell you that you are better off that way, but those people just didn't think about it. Period. Was it dumb? yes. It was. But yet, you have to understand where these people are coming from:

They are poor, uneducated, and just trying to get by through the day. They are not saving to buy a plasma tv, a PC, internet, a cellphone, etc. They are just trying to get by. They buy milk, beef to eat, maize(corn) tortillas, pay bills, etc. Not that many luxuries, and they are used to it; and sadly, they are also complacent, very, very complacent. They know it doesn't work, and they are used to living in those conditions. And what exactly is it? Well, it is everything, unless it means charging you for stuff. Picture that in your head: Cops, libraries, fire department, safety regulations, health department, army, etc. It just doesn't work. It is there, but it can't do much when the chips are down. And so, the feeling is widespread throughout the population at large, and it's a fact of life that you have to put up with, and so you hope for the best.

I'm telling you, not even Obama has more hope than we do.

For example, unless you are rich or have some kind of influence, everyone just knows that you better not call the cops when unless way-off-the chart-bad-shit happens to you because you just don't know what you might get(maybe they end stop by and leave like nothing happened, or maybe they will try to get something from you to make sure your story "checks up", if you know what I mean). The police is there to contain the problem of society in general, and only acts when it really, really, really has to in order to mantain things just barely working. That is just one reason why 90% of all crimes in Mexico just go unreported.

In a way, Mexico would serve to prove that society, while not good, it's just not evil either. Because since it just does not work, we could just be fucking shit up like there is no tomorrow all over the place, and instead we just chill and we are like "Yup, another day at the office." Don't get me wrong, things are bad here, but it could be just so much worse.

Just think for a moment: What if there were no good cops, no good firemen, and no good army to contain a massive problem? Had the Los Angeles riots happened in Mexico, there would have been a masscre because the only way our government knows of dealing with really bad stuff between people is to quelch it with force. I tell you, my dad looks at the mess with Iran and he remembers the shit he had to put with during the sixties and the seventies.

thiosk said:
Safety regulations are born every time there is a massive, high profile disaster in a country. Mexico seems to be a bit backward in this respect. There will be little restitution, but if the nation is actually not retarded, the people will act on the government, and the government will put together some sort of building codes.

Nightclub disasters are what led to the multiple exits and the "don't build stages with pyrotechnics out of paper mache" laws
No, no. You don't get it. The regulations are there. It's just that nobody follows them.

Are we a bit backwards? No. We are really backwards when it comes to following the regulations.

Will the government put forth some sort of building codes? They're already there but everyone mostly ignores them.
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
unabomberman said:
Sparrow Tag said:
I'm always skeptical of people's views toward the death of younger people. Is there such a difference between 17 and 18 years of age? A teenager dies, and we're up in arms. An 18 year old dies, and it's just another tally on the board.

I think people feel sorry for the death of younger people, because everyone else does. Just being a big old flock of sheep. Or hey, I could just be a non-emotional bastard.

Make yourselves feel better and go with the second option.
So, no. You're not being a non-emotional bastard. You're just being an idiot and you just haven't been there and don't know beter, and that's perfectly fine if you are fine with it. Nobody's forcing you to think otherwise.
I would rather not discuss it, but I have been through the death of children. In my family no less. Do not assume otherwise. Just because I do not care, doesn't mean I do not have experience.

Your speaking on behalf of other people. You yourself seem to have no experience in the death of younger people. You may argue being near this incident deems otherwise, but it does not.

When your younger brother dies, give me a call and I'll discuss this further.
 

About To Crash

New member
Apr 24, 2009
332
0
0
First off, I'm impressed that you actually manage rallies where you live. The most that we manage here is some crazy old man who shouts at cars (This being the epitome of Canada).
Yeah, I'd agree that it's something to be pissed about, dead baby jokes were only funny because they were shockingly inappropriate, and when a baby actually dies anyone who laughs gets drawn and quartered. Even though this is all horribly tragic, I do think that taking things down a notch in the anger department won't hurt you. Your speech is very anger driven, and if that's how you always talk about it, many people aren't going to want to listen. You become the old man shouting at passing cars.
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
Sparrow Tag said:
unabomberman said:
Sparrow Tag said:
I'm always skeptical of people's views toward the death of younger people. Is there such a difference between 17 and 18 years of age? A teenager dies, and we're up in arms. An 18 year old dies, and it's just another tally on the board.

I think people feel sorry for the death of younger people, because everyone else does. Just being a big old flock of sheep. Or hey, I could just be a non-emotional bastard.

Make yourselves feel better and go with the second option.
So, no. You're not being a non-emotional bastard. You're just being an idiot and you just haven't been there and don't know beter, and that's perfectly fine if you are fine with it. Nobody's forcing you to think otherwise.


I would rather not discuss it, but I have been through the death of children. In my family no less. Do not assume otherwise. Just because I do not care, doesn't mean I do not have experience.

Your speaking on behalf of other people. You yourself seem to have no experience in the death of younger people. You may argue being near this incident deems otherwise, but it does not.

When your younger brother dies, give me a call and I'll discuss this further.


No dice. I'm not a moron, and I too know pain and what it looks like. Death is not the most godawful thing that can befall a family or a person, and guess what? People do grow up and they mature, and they figure their way around things because there is no other choice. I do know that from personal experience.

You are within your right to speak your piece as someone who has been there, but don't think for a moment you somehow have the monopoly in misery enough that it warrants you to be dismissive of other people experiencing bad shit so that nobody can tell you anything.

What you said was idiotic and I stand by that. You don't like it? Too bad. What I said was me being honest. If you say what you say, then you don't know any better, and that doesn't mean you haven't lived it.

EDIT:

About To Crash said:
First off, I'm impressed that you actually manage rallies where you live. The most that we manage here is some crazy old man who shouts at cars (This being the epitome of Canada).
Yeah, I'd agree that it's something to be pissed about, dead baby jokes were only funny because they were shockingly inappropriate, and when a baby actually dies anyone who laughs gets drawn and quartered. Even though this is all horribly tragic, I do think that taking things down a notch in the anger department won't hurt you. Your speech is very anger driven, and if that's how you always talk about it, many people aren't going to want to listen. You become the old man shouting at passing cars.
Whoa, relax! I never said I managed any rallies. I was there doing my part being part of the bunch, but I never said I managed them. Or did you mean that in general?

When there is a situation as the one I outlined there aren't many things to do left but whine, or are there? But yeah, I'm actually a pretty calm guy, and I your point's been noted, and much appreciated. But in all honesty I didn't really realize I was that angry.
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
unabomberman said:
Sparrow Tag said:
unabomberman said:
Sparrow Tag said:
I'm always skeptical of people's views toward the death of younger people. Is there such a difference between 17 and 18 years of age? A teenager dies, and we're up in arms. An 18 year old dies, and it's just another tally on the board.

I think people feel sorry for the death of younger people, because everyone else does. Just being a big old flock of sheep. Or hey, I could just be a non-emotional bastard.

Make yourselves feel better and go with the second option.
So, no. You're not being a non-emotional bastard. You're just being an idiot and you just haven't been there and don't know beter, and that's perfectly fine if you are fine with it. Nobody's forcing you to think otherwise.


I would rather not discuss it, but I have been through the death of children. In my family no less. Do not assume otherwise. Just because I do not care, doesn't mean I do not have experience.

Your speaking on behalf of other people. You yourself seem to have no experience in the death of younger people. You may argue being near this incident deems otherwise, but it does not.

When your younger brother dies, give me a call and I'll discuss this further.


No dice. I'm not a moron, and I too know pain and what it looks like. Death is not the most godawful thing that can befall a family or a person, and guess what? People do grow up and they mature, and they figure their way around things because there is no other choice. I do know that from personal experience.

You are within your right to speak your piece as someone who has been there, but don't think for a moment you somehow have the monopoly in misery enough that it warrants you to be dismissive of other people experiencing bad shit so that nobody can tell you anything.

What you said was idiotic and I stand by that. You don't like it? Too bad. What I said was me being honest. If you say what you say, then you don't know any better, and that doesn't mean you haven't lived it.


May I ask, you say you've experienced the pain. Can I ask what happened?

Of course I don't mind if you don't want to share. I'm just curious.

(By the way, I'm not arguing. You seem like a respectable type, and you know what your on about. Plus, arguing usually doesn't get anyone anywhere)
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
Sparrow Tag said:
unabomberman said:
Sparrow Tag said:
unabomberman said:
Sparrow Tag said:
I'm always skeptical of people's views toward the death of younger people. Is there such a difference between 17 and 18 years of age? A teenager dies, and we're up in arms. An 18 year old dies, and it's just another tally on the board.

I think people feel sorry for the death of younger people, because everyone else does. Just being a big old flock of sheep. Or hey, I could just be a non-emotional bastard.

Make yourselves feel better and go with the second option.
So, no. You're not being a non-emotional bastard. You're just being an idiot and you just haven't been there and don't know beter, and that's perfectly fine if you are fine with it. Nobody's forcing you to think otherwise.


I would rather not discuss it, but I have been through the death of children. In my family no less. Do not assume otherwise. Just because I do not care, doesn't mean I do not have experience.

Your speaking on behalf of other people. You yourself seem to have no experience in the death of younger people. You may argue being near this incident deems otherwise, but it does not.

When your younger brother dies, give me a call and I'll discuss this further.


No dice. I'm not a moron, and I too know pain and what it looks like. Death is not the most godawful thing that can befall a family or a person, and guess what? People do grow up and they mature, and they figure their way around things because there is no other choice. I do know that from personal experience.

You are within your right to speak your piece as someone who has been there, but don't think for a moment you somehow have the monopoly in misery enough that it warrants you to be dismissive of other people experiencing bad shit so that nobody can tell you anything.

What you said was idiotic and I stand by that. You don't like it? Too bad. What I said was me being honest. If you say what you say, then you don't know any better, and that doesn't mean you haven't lived it.


May I ask, you say you've experienced the pain. Can I ask what happened?

Of course I don't mind if you don't want to share. I'm just curious.

(By the way, I'm not arguing. You seem like a respectable type, and you know what your on about. Plus, arguing usually doesn't get anyone anywhere)


Okay.

First, I'm not gonna elaborate and I'd suggest that you don't do either for this be teh internets.

Second, I'm doing this because in here you already said your piece in the forum and not PM.

Okay, there it goes: My little case in not that unusual, and certainly not as harrowingly sudden as a berievement, which is your case. It was, quite simply, years of a really bad case of less than ideal upbringing circumstances which made it hard for everyone involved.

Was it that bad? I honestly can't tell in any deffinitive manner, but it felt bad enough, and let's face it, we kids tend to idealize things and they may or may not have been exactly as one remembers them, and to be honest, while there were hiccups along the way, I got used to it. As usual some got it harder than others, I guess, but that's just how things are. No biggie.

If life is not exactly a finely tuned machine people find it easier to focus around certain "specific" areas of said machine. Good thing is that that gets old very fast out of necessity.

Besides, what I've learned is that everyone has their own self-aggrandized version of their tragic lives in their heads(and good lord, let's not even mention the internet where everyone claims to be fucked up), but those dealing with real problems either act out, or not at all and just lay low. Really damaged people develop a strange criteria that non damaged people find it hard to put with.

It's not much but there you have it. I really don't know if that'll do it for you.

And I disagree, arguing does get you to a place where you at least know where someone else stands.

Also, while being called "respectable" strangely works as an ego boost, it does make me feel old. I'm 26 but daaamn...how old are you?
 

atol

New member
Jan 16, 2009
297
0
0
I'm racking my head trying to find a word to describe the bereaved folks I saw
How about bereaved?

You had me believing you were a well spoken 16 year old with the mulitple usages of "daddy" and "kid".
Give it a few months and no one will care, at least not to a noticable level. Walking is just organized complacency in the end. The scenario of a burning darycare is a tame reason to reform a government, even the fire exit doesn't really guarantee anyone's survival. And the lack of healthcare education stems to other problems one would expect from a third world country. I don't understand rants sometimes.
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
atol said:
I'm racking my head trying to find a word to describe the bereaved folks I saw
How about bereaved?

You had me believing you were a well spoken 16 year old with the mulitple usages of "daddy" and "kid".
Give it a few months and no one will care, at least not to a noticable level. Walking is just organized complacency in the end. The scenario of a burning darycare is a tame reason to reform a government, even the fire exit doesn't really guarantee anyone's survival. And the lack of healthcare education stems to other problems one would expect from a third world country. I don't understand rants sometimes.
Saying that walking is an organized form of complacency is complacent in itself so I won't even go there, you have some figuring out to do. Also, saying that the scenario of a burning daycare being a tame reason to reform things is also misinformed and just plain conceited. Give me a break. I explained that the burning of the daycare is but a symptom of a much bigger problem but oh, well...apparently living in a thrid world country means I have to put up and shut up.

Just because you have an opinion and know how to trivialize does not mean it is an educated one.

Indeed you do not understand rants.

P.D: As for my usage of "daddy," it was me trying to be funny. No one my age really says anything resembling to "me daddy," and it is in fact just gramatically wrong.

And just as a cultural fact: bereaved is a general term that signifies the death of a loved one. Go ahead and find one that describes a parent that has lost his/her child.
 

MCJazz77

New member
Jun 23, 2009
10
0
0
Ok, gonna play the devil's advocate here and say that thousands of people die every day from preventable causes and you're pissed off at under 50 dead kids? Call me all the names you want but it doesn't change the fact that the world as a whole is not any worse off than it was before the kids died. It was sad they died but what do you want the government to do? It's not like they can bring the kids back to life and even if you do bring some reform to the system (you aren't gonna get much if you get any at all) accidents are still gonna happen and it's not like making few reforms is gonna change that. Besides, the government has 109,955,400 people to watch out for and SIGNIFICANTLY bigger problems to deal with. So, go ahead with your moral outrage, but the world isn't gonna care. They have no reason too.
 

xChevelle24

New member
Mar 10, 2009
730
0
0
unabomberman said:
This has to do with the tragedy that happened the past fifth of july when a daycare center burned here, in my city, Hermosillo, and several kids(babies, for fuck's sake) suffered horrible, horrible burns.

News link from CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/06/07/mexico.day.care.fire/

Rant Mode On:

It's been a little while since then and I wasn't planning on writing about it here, because let's face it, people just have other things to do than read about this. But since attending a rally yesterday I thought it may just be the appropriate thing to do, so bear with me for a little while.

Officially, what was a glaring case of omission turned into an "accident" and nobody's done shit. Not to mention that the daycare was, for all intents and purposes, a fucking warehouse with no emergency exits whatsoever. Negligent much?

We are 16 days from the incident, three marches that culminated in rallies, and nothing has happened. The death toll is at 46 as of now and it will probably go up in the coming days.

One thing I've noticed is that the government doesn't give two shits about this. Sure, our idiot president came and spoke about the tragedy and yadda, yadda, but nothing happened, not to mention that one of the owners, a woman named Marcia Matilde Altagracia Gomez del Campo Tonella is a relative of his wife. Now, guess where this is going...

The daycare system here, known as The Surrogate Daycare System, is a BIG business for owners, if they can get their mits on it, as they get subsidized by the government for every kid admitted, and in the case of Sonora, my city, it is also littered with relatives of politicians. Yup. Someone's making a killing here, both literally and figuratively. They only have to get a building, minimize costs, and that's that.

Ironically, I've just realized I'm listening to a song named For The Fire, by Turin Brakes...ugh...this is no joke to heighten teh dramaz.

In the eve of things, the kids were supposed to be flown to a hospital in the U.S where they have trained people, as in professionally trained, to treat burn victims of that magnitude(not to mention their age), and a number of them indeed have been, while others are still here, and guess what? Someone, somewhere in the government thought it was better to be actively keeping them here, where we embarrassingly don't have a fucking clue as of what to do with them.

The government told the parents they were being flown to the U.S but later it turned out it was no dice, and instead flew them to Guadalajara to a kickass hospital with state of the art equipment that not a soul knows how to use correctly, and where some idiot thought that giving two of the burned kids water baths was the way to go. The end product? They died of collapsed lungs.

Yup, what the fire and smoke poisoning didn't get to do we did. Booyah, one for the team...

Now, so bad were things that even the U.S doctors were angrily demanding the mexican consulate to tell them the fuck was going on. Why weren't they getting the remaining kids so they could fucking treat them?

Harrowingly I realize our government is most likely trying to cut costs on these kids because for every kid that gets treated in the U.S, and survives, the tab here grows and grows, and grows. Yes. Burn victims be expensive these days. But, following that train of thought, was there a cheaper choice? Yes. There was one fucking choice. It's fucking called CUBA. Just like they did with the Chernobyl children. But wait...we burned that bridge too...fuck.

Sauce, if you don't believe me on the kids from Chernobyl: http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/43b/030.html

Sauce on the state of Mexican-Cuban relations: http://havanajournal.com/cuban_americans/entry/can-president-calderon-of-mexico-restore-mexico-cuba-relations/
(and if you read it: no, he couldn't, and didn't mind much.)


Everyone got royally pissed. What started first as a "justice rally"(because people just don't know what the fuck to call it these days) of a bunch of people walking(mind you, it has been like eight thousand so far but that still counts) because of indignation, now has somewhat formed into a little social movement where now they want reform in the daycare system, at the very least.

Now, yesterday I was at one of said rallies. I've been to two of the three(me daddy brought me up to be solidary...those commies, I tell you) and my overall view on this thing is that shit's gonna get bad. Incidentally, everytime there has been one, people congregated outside of the Palacio de Gobierno(basically the main government building), and guess what? the governor "happened" to be out, just as he had the previous two ones.

I assure you there's no schadenfreude in watching a series of poor people(like, economically poor) take turns to wail, cry, and then scream in public that the government doesn't care one bit, and that it took their kids away in its attempt to conduct bussiness. Ironically then they asks it for "justice," all the while a chorus chants "ASESINOS!(murderers)" over and over again.

It doesn't get any more inverosimile than that.

As I finish this thing(finally, right?) I'm racking my head trying to find a word to describe the bereaved folks I saw, and I realize I can't find it because it turns out it does not exist. At least not in english or in spanish. Someone who lost his/her parents you call an orphan, someone who lost a spouse you call a widow/er, but you just can't call anything a person who lost a child because the word does not exist.

When the indescribable happened those in power did nothing. We are sixteen days in since this thing began and they haven't done one bit.

I can't shake the thought that people can only be pushed so far before they begin to entertain the notion of belligerence in their minds. Yesterday amidst choking sounds one of the parents addressing the government infront of the crowd said "Be careful because I've got nothing to lose anymore," and people began cheering wildly, and so I turned to me daddy and in a deadpan way and just uttered "Okay, That was unexpected."

What do I get from this? That the system is uncontroversially, irreparably broken.

Someone in Mexico said, a reporter lady whose name I cannot remember at the moment, that our system didn't thrive on impunity to but rather needed it to exist. Can you picture that? Forsaken angry people chanting "ASESINOS" together as a mob.


Ok, I'm out.
Cool story, bro.

*moves on*