OP, I can relate to you; I've taken the same decision, though for slightly different reasons: I don't want the responsibility and the expense, I don't like children and I don't think I could ever be a good parent.
However, I do not think starting a family in general is a mistake. I don't look down on anyone who does, but whenever the subject is brought up and I mention that I wouldn't ever want kids, the reaction is usually surprise and unbelief, as if it's absurd or immature to make such a decision, as if it's expected and necessary for every single human to start a family.
Around here, people are a bit more tolerant about unusual lifestyle choices. They usually raise an eyebrow when I tell them I don't want children, ever, but only the deeply religious are very surprised.
People do tend to freak out when I tell them I'm about to get a vasectomy though. If I had a penny for every time I heard the words "but you're too young!"... well, I'd only have a few bucks, but you get the idea.
Ironically, the one who DIDN'T freak out was my mom. She knew how I thought about the whole thing, so she just accepted my decision.
Now to find ?1000 or so of disposable money to pay for it...
It's not as if there's an immediate problem with the world population being too low, so I must ask, why does the notion of never having children seem so unacceptable to the general public?
Religious indoctrination plays a big part. Other than that, I guess it's just that most people are incapable of putting rationality above their evolution-given instincts.
Embright said:
This leads to quite a conundrum. On one hand if you are intelligent enough to rationally decide whether or not children are a good idea and weigh both sides of that argument in order to come up with a worthwhile decision, many people in the world who are dumb as bricks don't and have (many) children anyways.
Whenever someone brings this up, I always think of a world where breeding is artificial. And yeah, that's a scary, brave-new-world-type thought that entails a whole lot of change into what we think as acceptable; on the other hand, would it really be so bad to drastically increase the percentage of smart people? Would humanity as a whole not prosper from such a change?
More importantly, would we be able to retain the good things of such a system, while not succumbing to the temptation of eliminating, through genetic selection, all the bad things about humanity?
Nobody appreciates good things if there aren't bad things to contrast them. Would humanity thrive if ugliness, stupidity and such were to be removed, or drastically reduced? Or would we just become a race of aesthetically perfect, smart, but extremely bored and apathetic beings?
I have watched Gattaca too many times. *sigh*
So while I'm assuming you are intelligent because it seems you are thinking, without children you are merely helping the global statistical average of human intelligence slide left.
I'm aware of that, but frankly, MY needs have a much bigger priority to me than the needs of the world, especially considering the incredibly small scale on which I'd contribute by having one or more children.