This, perfect example.zala-taichou said:There are only three Star Wars films. Nuff said...
This, perfect example.zala-taichou said:There are only three Star Wars films. Nuff said...
No. No, that is inaccurate. When being observed in any visually-based fashion, their entire physical composition changes. They are, in fact, COMPLETELY INANIMATE WHILE BEING VIEWED.Dr_Horrible said:I admit, I don't like the 11th Doctor much either, but I don't find him offensive enough to be non-canon.conflictofinterests said:I have declared the Doctor Who season(s?) after David Tennant left non-cannon. I honestly can't stand the new guy.
You know what WAS non-canon though? That 2-part episode with the weeping angels. YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO SEE THEM MOVE!
Thank you! I couldn't have put it any better... way to not follow your own canon, Dr. Who!conflictofinterests said:No. No, that is inaccurate. When being observed in any visually-based fashion, their entire physical composition changes. They are, in fact, COMPLETELY INANIMATE WHILE BEING VIEWED.Dr_Horrible said:I admit, I don't like the 11th Doctor much either, but I don't find him offensive enough to be non-canon.conflictofinterests said:I have declared the Doctor Who season(s?) after David Tennant left non-cannon. I honestly can't stand the new guy.
You know what WAS non-canon though? That 2-part episode with the weeping angels. YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO SEE THEM MOVE!
Thank ye; I hate it -so- much when overzealous fanboys insist that I call him Eggman; I grew up with Robotnik I'm going to call him that.Atticus89 said:Dr. Robotnik.
Yeah, I agree with that; I thought it was fairly artistic that in the original weeping angel episode the angels were frozen when the camera focused on them; as though -you- seeing them kept them frozen. Completely ruined when they started moving in that 2 parter.Dr_Horrible said:Thank you! I couldn't have put it any better... way to not follow your own canon, Dr. Who!conflictofinterests said:No. No, that is inaccurate. When being observed in any visually-based fashion, their entire physical composition changes. They are, in fact, COMPLETELY INANIMATE WHILE BEING VIEWED.Dr_Horrible said:I admit, I don't like the 11th Doctor much either, but I don't find him offensive enough to be non-canon.conflictofinterests said:I have declared the Doctor Who season(s?) after David Tennant left non-cannon. I honestly can't stand the new guy.
You know what WAS non-canon though? That 2-part episode with the weeping angels. YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO SEE THEM MOVE!
And there was no Halloween 3. It was simply Season of the Witch.zala-taichou said:There are only three Star Wars films. Nuff said...
That is why I'm happy I live in a parallel earth where the best ending is the only true ending.Ophi said:I'm fine with Final Fantasy X-2 happening.
But the good/best endings never happened, dammit.
The canon ending was the 'bad' one, and nothing anybody says can make me feel differently.
That is why I'm happy I live in a parallel earth where the best ending is the only true ending.Ophi said:I'm fine with Final Fantasy X-2 happening.
But the good/best endings never happened, dammit.
The canon ending was the 'bad' one, and nothing anybody says can make me feel differently.
I'd go so far as to add Prime 2. It's literally the same game as Prime 1 with the only important element being the introduction of Dark Samus. Boring environments, unmemorable enemies, no right to exist (except for DS)Diablo2000 said:The last Metroid was Prime 3.