declared Non-Canon

Recommended Videos

Yosato

New member
Apr 5, 2010
494
0
0
If not for the Super Saiyan 4 I'd say Dragonball GT, but aside from that, I can forgive the prequels, but The Clone Wars is my eyes is definitely non-canon. So is TFU not just because it is shit but because of the reasons Yahtzee highlighted: It's hard to believe that people didn't believe in the force in A New Hope if this one guy was taking down Star Destroyers with it a few years before.
 

Signa

Noisy Lurker
Legacy
Jul 16, 2008
4,749
6
43
Country
USA
Season 2, episode 15 - Threshold.

If you know what I'm talking about, I need not say more. Please don't make me say more.
 

faspxina

New member
Feb 1, 2010
803
0
0
Usually every movie that wasn't meant to be trilogy trilogy from the beginning, starts failing at sequel number 3.
 

Crystalite

New member
Apr 2, 2010
254
0
0
Enigmers said:
I think it's great that the Matrix never had sequels.
Nah, thats bad! I wish they would make some good ones some day! ;-)

The Silent Hill movie.
I actually found it to be quite fun, but really wtf!?

Also there are only three Star Wars movies, but that goes without saying.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
I think it has officially been said enough times, but there are only three Star Wars movies. But what about the video game Shadows of the Empire?

*Edit*

sapphireofthesea said:
zala-taichou said:
There are only three Star Wars films. Nuff said...
Totally agree with this.

For me in is the new bond films (With Daniel Crag). They are good by themselves but I try to think of them as James Pond films and judge them as they stand. To me they just don't feel like a James Bond film.
And before someone says it was before Bond became Bond, then why in heaven is the tech so much better with blackberries and cellphoes and the like. I am sorry but it is set when the Cold war is over, there is no way i am buying it is before the originals.
Yeah, I dont think anyone has ever given deep thought into how one explains the fact that Bond was played by five different actors in the movies, they just basically ignore it. So I firmly believe that the name Bond is actually a code name.
 

sapphireofthesea

New member
Jul 18, 2010
241
0
0
zala-taichou said:
There are only three Star Wars films. Nuff said...
Totally agree with this.

For me in is the new bond films (With Daniel Crag). They are good by themselves but I try to think of them as James Pond films and judge them as they stand. To me they just don't feel like a James Bond film.
And before someone says it was before Bond became Bond, then why in heaven is the tech so much better with blackberries and cellphoes and the like. I am sorry but it is set when the Cold war is over, there is no way i am buying it is before the originals.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
TerribleAssassin said:
emeraldrafael said:
TerribleAssassin said:
hence I said they carry MORE then regular episodes. Not they carry the ONLY canon.
Ahh fair enough, does 201 count as a regular episode, cause that was like massively canon in character development?
I'd say no, but I havent seen the episode in a while. But I would say no cause the Superfriends arent in many episodes after.
 

SuperNova221

New member
May 29, 2010
393
0
0
Homeworld 2.

They made such a great storyline in Homeworld, with an unusual but nice thing going on in Cataclysm. Homeworld 2 was just pathetic in comparison. Yet still well above average.
 

TheBadGamer

New member
Mar 8, 2010
143
0
0
Megaman X6,X7 and X8. For me the X series ended in X5, it was a perfect ending to a really great series, then X6 came out and fuck up the entire story and every thing I loved about the X series.
 

teh_gunslinger

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. did it better.
Dec 6, 2007
1,325
0
0
A few things: Fallout 3, all Star Wars save the original films, the Zahn books, TIE Fighter and the first two Dark Forces games, Splinter Cell Conviction, Max Payne 3, XCOM, Warcraft 3, World of Warcraft, every Dune book save the ones Herbert wrote himself and FIFA 2004.
 

Rathcoole

New member
Jan 1, 2011
135
0
0
Highlander - Anything after the first one is just stupid. It was a good movie, nice story that wrapped itself up prefectly the first time. Why keep piling crap unto it.

1. For those not knowing what this is I will give a brief summary. They are immortals, Fighting though the centures in somthing called the game, until only one remains and claims the mythical prize. They can only die by beheading. The hero is "Connor McCloud" a scottish immortal. Who in the end defeats the evil villian "the Kurgan" and wins the prize. being the only one left he is made mortal and given unlimited knowledge, it is thought the prize would be different depending on the desires of whoever had won it. (I wanted to make that quick but there is alot more too it)

2. "number 2" was just retarded, Long behold there all aliens and it's the year 2024. So now the alien general is coming to earth to kill him for seemingly no reason. So he is made immortal (again) and has to rejoin the game (again) in the end he kills the evil katana and wins the prize (again)

3. "number 3" was basicly just no 1 with different characters and ham fisted attemps to make it fit in. So it is set before number 2 with all of a sudden there where 3 immortals trapped in a cave in china who are now released and go to rejoin the game. Since there is only one left it is pretty obvious who they are going for. So he is made immortal (again) and has to go out and rejoin the game (again) and in the end he kills the evil Kane and wins the prize (again)

4. "the series" just went on ahead and ignores everything in the movies all together. Changing the character ( it's now duncan McCloud, Conners family decendent) and just completly kicking logic in the balls. But I will give this a narrow pass because it was a least entertaining, But does not fit any of the original canon and I just like to think of it like an alterative reality to the films.

5. "Endgame" tries to bring the series and movies together. To it's credit it tries but it was doomed from the beginning. Trying to patch this convoluted mess together. Plus it kills the star of the films in order to make the star of the series the hero. ( the wimpy little ***** Duncan kills the much more badass and skilled Connor because he has given up on life for some reason or another )But they do it in the year 2000. But Conner was the star of number 2 which was set in 2024. how can he die 24 years before before he takes part in number 2?

6. "the Source" It just plain sucked. It has no redeeming features and has abandoned pretty much everything both the movies and series where about and went off in a whole other retarded direction. The game is now about peace for some reason and the only way to win is to give up. No really a series whose whole premise was about immortals cutting off each others heads is suddenly all about peace and love. What a load of shit.


There was talk of this getting rebooted and by god does it need it. The whole canon is a mess and needs sorted out. This is not even taking in the cartoon series and the anime films. which interduce even more McClouds to the whole thing.
 

Wintermoot

New member
Aug 20, 2009
6,563
0
0
SirBryghtside said:
henritje said:
the pokemon games that came after the second one (excluding Fire Red,Leaf Green,Heart Gold and soul silver)
Why not actually try them? If you're going to hate on the new Pokémon, you obviously haven't even glanced at fourth gen past Magmortar or Probopass.

Every generation has its bad Pokémon. But when you have Luxray, Garchomp, Yanmega, Lucario, Floatzel - I could go on all day - can you really even care?

OT, I'll say Stargate Universe. It was terrible. I want SG1 back D:
I already played Saphire I kinda liked it (with exception of Hoen being small) I also played pearl but gave up around the 7th gym (I didnt know how to fix the path)
 

Trogdor1138

New member
May 28, 2010
1,116
0
0
twistedmic said:
There was never a fourth Die Hard movie made. There was rumor of one coming out yet, sadly, the whole movie fell through and it was never made.
I agree completely with this. I can't believe that piece of shit was well received by most critics and audiences. I thought I was going crazy when I saw it, thinking I was the only person around me that could see how horrible every element was about it. It was the perfect example of what not to do with a franchise but others seemed to react the opposite.

Reminds me of when I watched The Happening awhile back, I couldn't understand how some people actually liked it, it did absolutely everything completely wrong and had nothing to like about it.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
Trogdor1138 said:
twistedmic said:
There was never a fourth Die Hard movie made. There was rumor of one coming out yet, sadly, the whole movie fell through and it was never made.
I agree completely with this. I can't believe that piece of shit was well received by most critics and audiences. I thought I was going crazy when I saw it, thinking I was the only person around me that could see how horrible every element was about it. It was the perfect example of what not to do with a franchise but others seemed to react the opposite.

Reminds me of when I watched The Happening awhile back, I couldn't understand how some people actually liked it, it did absolutely everything completely wrong and had nothing to like about it.
HAha... wow... um, yeah... I liked Die Hard 4 somewhat, the thing that pissed me off the most was the lack of YIPPY KI YAY ************.
 

RabbidKuriboh

New member
Sep 19, 2010
376
0
0
ffx2 did NOT HAPPEN

neither did other M

both games turned their originally strong female casts into over-sexualised 2d cutouts with the mental capacity of 6 year olds