DGR : Call of Duty: World at War

Recommended Videos

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
lizards said:
which is why you have to get behind it and shoot it and above that what do you mean "full amount of ammo from 2 guns yes" were you shooting a tank with a rifle? sounds like someones been playing to much halo
I like how you presume I play Halo, when I don't. If the damage metre appears then I presume my gunfire damages the tank like in all war games - are you telling me it doesn't?

Regardless, it makes no difference [sarcasm] Thanks for nitpicking [/sarcasm]
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
D_987 said:
lizards said:
which is why you have to get behind it and shoot it and above that what do you mean "full amount of ammo from 2 guns yes" were you shooting a tank with a rifle? sounds like someones been playing to much halo
I like how you presume I play Halo, when I don't. If the damage metre appears then I presume my gunfire damages the tank like in all war games - are you telling me it doesn't?

Regardless, it makes no difference [sarcasm] Thanks for nitpicking [/sarcasm]
so please say this so its clear and focused


you want to kill tanks with machine guns and rifles?
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
lizards said:
D_987 said:
lizards said:
which is why you have to get behind it and shoot it and above that what do you mean "full amount of ammo from 2 guns yes" were you shooting a tank with a rifle? sounds like someones been playing to much halo
I like how you presume I play Halo, when I don't. If the damage metre appears then I presume my gunfire damages the tank like in all war games - are you telling me it doesn't?

Regardless, it makes no difference [sarcasm] Thanks for nitpicking [/sarcasm]
so please say this so its clear and focused


you want to kill tanks with machine guns and rifles?
If a huge amount of shots are fired then yes.
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
D_987 said:
lizards said:
D_987 said:
lizards said:
which is why you have to get behind it and shoot it and above that what do you mean "full amount of ammo from 2 guns yes" were you shooting a tank with a rifle? sounds like someones been playing to much halo
I like how you presume I play Halo, when I don't. If the damage metre appears then I presume my gunfire damages the tank like in all war games - are you telling me it doesn't?

Regardless, it makes no difference [sarcasm] Thanks for nitpicking [/sarcasm]
so please say this so its clear and focused


you want to kill tanks with machine guns and rifles?
If a huge amount of shots are fired then yes.
jesus christ im just going to assume that you were being sarcastic
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
lizards said:
D_987 said:
lizards said:
jesus christ im just going to assume that you were being sarcastic
Nothing gets past you does it?
what got nothing left?
If only there were a way to ban trolls from your threads - you know, people who either nitpick, take you up on a subjective point or are just plain idiotic (you apply to all 3).
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
D_987 said:
lizards said:
D_987 said:
lizards said:
jesus christ im just going to assume that you were being sarcastic
Nothing gets past you does it?
what got nothing left?
If only there were a way to ban trolls from your threads - you know, people who either nitpick, take you up on a subjective point or are just plain idiotic (you apply to all 3).
no if trolls would be banned then you have have been banned long before i even joined stop being an asshole troll
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
lizards said:
no if trolls would be banned then you have have been banned long before i even joined stop being an asshole troll
Right, thats why this community is known for its excellant Ban-hammer usage...1500 posts, and still here.

OK, lets get this straight:

. You've come onto my review thread, and bitched and moaning about a subjective opinion.

. I was sarcastic because I honestly couldn't believe someone would honesty take this seriously "If the damage metre appears then I presume my gunfire damages the tank like in all war games - are you telling me it doesn't?".

. The next interesting thing is the fact you are trying to call me a troll - why - you came onto my thread, you whined and moaned. Yet I'm a troll - perhaps you should have thought before typing your first post.

Oh, just in-case you don't understand the word subjective I took the liberty of finding a definition for you:

Subjectivity refers to a subject's perspective, particularly feelings, beliefs, and desires. It is often used casually to refer to unjustified personal opinions, in contrast to knowledge and justified belief. In philosophy, the term is often contrasted with objectivity.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjectivity
Hence why I wrote it in my review...
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
D_987 said:
lizards said:
no if trolls would be banned then you have have been banned long before i even joined stop being an asshole troll
Right, thats why this community is known for its excellant Ban-hammer usage...1500 posts, and still here.

OK, lets get this straight:

. You've come onto my review thread, and bitched and moaning about a subjective opinion.

. I was sarcastic because I honestly couldn't believe someone would honesty take this seriously "If the damage metre appears then I presume my gunfire damages the tank like in all war games - are you telling me it doesn't?".

. The next interesting thing is the fact you are trying to call me a troll - why - you came onto my thread, you whined and moaned. Yet I'm a troll - perhaps you should have thought before typing your first post.

Oh, just in-case you don't understand the word subjective I took the liberty of finding a definition for you:

Subjectivity refers to a subject's perspective, particularly feelings, beliefs, and desires. It is often used casually to refer to unjustified personal opinions, in contrast to knowledge and justified belief. In philosophy, the term is often contrasted with objectivity.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjectivity
Hence why I wrote it in my review...
you have just been upgraded from "someone who cant take a comment" to "arrogant little twat" ooo look at you you got this big cool thread and you can use wikipedia you and your giant ego are the only ones you have been proven an idiot here

your review was nice but now i see your as arrogant and sensitive as hell you talk as if i put 8 posts on here picking out everything i disagreed with in your review and your a troll because your acting like a prick over a comment shut up and stick your ass in a freezer cause you need to cool down

from now on ill remember that i cant disagree with you because i will upset your sensitive ass
 

Beffudled Sheep

New member
Jan 23, 2009
2,029
0
0
Country
Texas
I stopped playing multiplayer because of those damn tanks and perks. I only played through single player because i liked the Russian campaign and weapons. My friendly AI wasn't as bad as everyone is saying but the enemy AI was horrible. I would have every enemy in the game firing at my position and i had to wait for my friendly AI to take them out. It took a long time for them to take out enough enemies to make it safe to attack. I couldn't put my controller down and do something else while i waited because of the enemy AI's constant nade spaming and kamikazi attacks.

Is it just me or did the AI in the Russian campaign seem to be a lot (and i mean a lot) better than the AI in the American campaign?
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
lizards said:
you have just been upgraded from "someone who cant take a comment" to "arrogant little twat"
That made me laugh, all I'm doing is getting my point of view across - your getting defensive because you've been beaten in reasoned argument.

ooo look at you you got this big cool thread and you can use wikipedia you and your giant ego are the only ones you have been proven an idoit here
The fact you spelt idiot wrong kinda proves a point.

your review was nice

but now i see your as arrogant and sensitive as hell you talk

as if i put 8 posts on here picking out everything i disagreed with in your review
No, you put 8 posts on here picking out an completely irrelevant point. I replied too it in a humorous fashion - not my fault if you can't spot clear sarcasm. Terrible grammar too.

and your a troll because your acting like a prick over a comment shut up and stick your ass in a freezer cause you need to cool down
"Acting like a prick" is subjective...personally I think you acting like "a prick". I also think you need to re-evaluate your definition of "troll".

from now on ill remember that i cant disagree with you because i will upset your sensitive ass
I argue my point of view quite a lot on these forums to be honest - people don't like the fact that I usually win or at least take the argument to a stand-still where neither point is justified.
You just lost and now your throwing any old insult you can think of in a pathetic attempt and making me seem the "bad guy".
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
D_987 said:
lizards said:
you have just been upgraded from "someone who cant take a comment" to "arrogant little twat"
That made me laugh, all I'm doing is getting my point of view across - your getting defensive because you've been beaten in reasoned argument.

ooo look at you you got this big cool thread and you can use wikipedia you and your giant ego are the only ones you have been proven an idoit here
The fact you spelt idiot wrong kinda proves a point.

your review was nice

but now i see your as arrogant and sensitive as hell you talk

as if i put 8 posts on here picking out everything i disagreed with in your review
No, you put 8 posts on here picking out an completely irrelevant point. I replied too it in a humorous fashion - not my fault if you can't spot clear sarcasm. Terrible grammar too.

and your a troll because your acting like a prick over a comment shut up and stick your ass in a freezer cause you need to cool down
"Acting like a prick" is subjective...personally I think you acting like "a prick". I also think you need to re-evaluate your definition of "troll".

from now on ill remember that i cant disagree with you because i will upset your sensitive ass
I argue my point of view quite a lot on these forums to be honest - people don't like the fact that I usually win or at least take the argument to a stand-still where neither point is justified.
You just lost and now your throwing any old insult you can think of in a pathetic attempt and making me seem the "bad guy".
no you just wont let that i hurt your feelings go and now you think huge walls of text will let you win but the more you talk the more and more i see that you think that your above me for some reason

and by the way im glad you added my grammar is bad because it so seems like im trying and that i dont care about grammar in an online forum
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
lizards said:
no you just wont let that i hurt your feelings go and now you think huge walls of text will let you win but the more you talk the more and more i see that you think that your above me for some reason
Of course I think I'm above you...thats obvious.


and by the way im glad you added my grammer is bad because it so seems like im trying and that i dont care about grammer in an online forum
Mainly because of this, I can't take comments with this level of poor grammar seriously - are you deliberately using bad grammar?

P.S - You spelt "Grammar" wrong. Twice.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
Jester Lord said:
Is it just me or did the AI in the Russian campaign seem to be a lot (and i mean a lot) better than the AI in the American campaign?
Yes, I think so.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
Jester Lord said:
Now onto a second question. Why is the AI better?
Possibly because the Japanese A.I is something new to the series, whilst the German A.I is classic COD.
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
D_987 said:
lizards said:
no you just wont let that i hurt your feelings go and now you think huge walls of text will let you win but the more you talk the more and more i see that you think that your above me for some reason
Of course I think I'm above you...thats obvious.


and by the way im glad you added my grammer is bad because it so seems like im trying and that i dont care about grammer in an online forum
Mainly because of this, I can't take comments with this level of poor grammar seriously - are you deliberately using bad grammar?

P.S - You spelt "Grammar" wrong. Twice.
then it looks like you get to eat shit