I was referring to the fact that we're not allowed to talk about certain legal software and/or browser plug-ins that shall tactfully remain unnamed.The Virgo said:I disagree about the place being run like "Nazi Germany minus Genocide". The mods usually stay out of the way most part here and we at least get to say "Goddamn motherfucking shit fucker" without incurring wrath as long as it's not directed towards anyone. At least the mods here don't threaten to ban you and afterwards send you an EMAIL saying "SEE, I TOLD YOU SO" (umm, harassment?) and then the admins say they are NOT overstepping their boundaries! And yes, that ACTUALLY happened on a big forum (not here, though).canadamus_prime said:No, I rarely look at other people's forum health meters. Personally I think the whole forum health meter thing is retarded. Not the concept itself, but the fact that the meter never goes down. That coupled with the fact that this forum is run somewhat akin to Nazi Germany minus the genocide leaves me feeling like I'm walking on eggshells filled with broken glass every time I come here.
However, I DO agree that the meter should go down after a period of time, depending on the crime. Like, a week for low content and so on, except for trolling, harrasment and moderator insulting. Yeah, currently, it's like we all clocks, ticking down until we all get banned.
EDIT: Wait, just saw a reply above saying they do. Nevermind.
Such situations are what the appeal system is for.Da Orky Man said:I once got a low-content post for a mistype. I accidentally wrote my comment in the quote box, so I got reported.Sizzle Montyjing said:In a way i do.
If, let's say they have got a lot of warnings/ moderator wrath in a short period of time (let's say if you're on the red and still under 100 posts) then i know they won't last long.
However, if they've got a few (2-4) warnings over a 1000 post count, then i know that they're usually good people.
Hell, i've got 2 warnings and one of them i got for a reason which i didn't even know existed!
The other one was for a mis-understanding.
Negative. The first poster has a birthday, whatever it is the second poster has a 1/365 of matching discounting leap yearsSyphous said:I think it would be more like 1/730. But then leap-year would change the odds as well, so... wait, who cares?YawningAngel said:1/365, since you ask.The Virgo said:Catchy Slogan said:No. I rarely ever even look at peoples profiles. I judge people by what they write.Wow. The first two posters on this topic have the same birthday! :-O What are the chances?MellowFellow said:I don't even look at infraction meters, I had forgot about them until I read the thread title, haha. So no I don't.
OT: No, I never look at peoples profiles. I am too busy looking at posts.
I remember HankMan, and I have to disagree. The rules are quite clear about low content posts, and if you spend most of your time just making posts that contain a pun that adds nothing to the conversation and nothing else in the post to make it worthwhile, you're going to get banned. Not to mention that you get SEVEN warnings before a ban is administered, so if after seven warnings to post something meaningful instead of just puns he still didn't get it, then he deserves to be removed. And let's look at the post he was banned for. He posted "Yes Really!". That's it. Clearly a low content post, and what do the rules say about low content posts? Not to make them. Seems like a very fair ban to me.Gralian said:I actually find that the infraction meter tends to be a signifier of popularity more than anything else. I find people who are highly influential in the escapist community tend to have several infractions. One example is the recent perma-banning of MackHeath (for what i consider to be an extremely petulant reason, i might add. He was banned because he wrote on an article that he didn't care about the subject of the article, hardly ban material when the article itself is up for debate on whether it really belongs in the news section or even on this website at all) and another is the banning of HankMan, for those who remember him. He got heavy infractions for his use of puns on every single article comment and little else.