But did you automatically assume a dead person was responsible? It could have been extra-dimensional phenomena, fnords, or Invisible Sasquatch. Any of those explanations is better than "dead guy, but not." It's like someone hearing The Bloop and insisting that it's Cthulhu. I'm usually content to just chalk things up to "weird shit."mandaforever said:I find it interesting that people can just straight up write this off, thinking they know everything.
I do not personally believe in ghosts, but I do believe there are things going on we are not aware of as human beings. I've had at least 5 horror movie status paranormal experiences happen to me in my own house. I felt someone lying on top of me in my bed every night for 3 months, and it tapped on my foot a few times. I saw a flash of light and heard a scream (not an ordinary scream). Music has played out of my computer speakers when no music station was on and the volume was tuned all the way down (I wouldn't call it music though...)
ya. I can't just write those experiences off, but I wish they had never happened. No theyre not all in my head, because I was wide awake every time these things happened. No I am not mentally unstable. It just happened.
Yes a legit business that profits off the stupidity of others, no offense to you or your mother but busiesses have profited off of stupidity for a long time this is another. What happens is you mother "heals" them and in the time they think it's working that's actually their body fighting off the virus and they just co relating it to the healingAqua Trenoble said:Obviously you didn't read a word of the previous sentence. Repeat clients. FOR 20 FUCKING YEARS. Nobody, no matter how gullible, pays 200 dollars on a regular basis for absolutely no reason. She gets referrals all the damn time. It is a legitimate buisness, dude.flaming_squirrel said:Gullibility comes to mind..Aqua Trenoble said:I'm not even kidding, if there's good, reliable money in telehealing then there must be something to it.
Because that's not falling into the same trap you were just condemning at all.interspark said:not wanting to sound abnoxious but i'm afraid it's the only explanation!
Not only are you attempting to redefine how objects exist, you are also attempting to redefine how light works. If the tree is indeed invisible (which I doubt, but hypothetically) then light will pass through it. We know this because we see things by light bouncing off them into our eyes. If light bounces off it, we can see it. If light is absorbed by it, we can see it, it's black. If light goes right through it and bounces off things on the other side, then it is invisible.interspark said:The logic works as follows, there is a shadow on my window sill, it's shaped like a tree so the thing casting it must be a tree, judging by the defined shape of the shadow the thing must be close, as there are no close trees visible it stands to reasson that the thing casting the shadow is invisible, in contrary to what we understand from science.
On that topic: I'd be so divided if dark matter somehow turned out to be the souls of the dead...Vigormortis said:I am a firm advocate of the sciences. As such, I am also one of the first people to say that there is a vast amount of things, events, and phenomena in the universe we don't understand. Yet. However, anthropomorphizing them with such off-hand, inexplicable human ideas as "ghosts" and "big foot" without looking for evidence or even being open to the possibility of other explanations is just down-right ignorant.
Yes, but the problem is that they're saying that only on the grounds that they do not know what the explanation is.Aqua Trenoble said:Eh, I don't think that that translation is necessarily accurate. All that they're saying is that the explanation doesn't lie within what is accepted as normal. This could mean that the phenomenon requires more scientific analysis or it could mean that space-rays from the planet Xenon are fucking with us.Jonluw said:What people are saying is: Look at that thing that happened! You can't explain how that happened! That must mean a ghost/paranormal phenomenon did it!
This is stupid. What they're saying is "That can't be explained, therefore I can explain it."
There are such things as tricks of the light.interspark said:not wanting to sound abnoxious but i'm afraid it's the only explanation! the logic works as follows, there is a shadow on my window sill, it's shaped like a tree so the thing casting it must be a tree, judging by the defined shape of the shadow the thing must be close, as there are no close trees visible it stands to reasson that the thing casting the shadow is invisible, in contrary to what we understand from science. as for the second statement, i really dislike it when people claim to pass off "your eyes were playing tricks on you" as an explanation, this may be the case for glimmers in the corners of one's eyes or for the emotionally strained or insane, but neither of those apply to me, i saw this shadow plain as day, on several occasions! and i am certainly not insane!Jonluw said:I do consider the possibility. However, among the possible explanations for what you are describing, the idea that there was an invisible tree or a ghost casting the shade are among the least likely ones.
Personally, I'd say it's more likely that you misinterpreted your situation or that your eyes were playing you a trick than it is that you experienced something that goes against a very basic understanding of physics.
I'm sorry, but if you're unable to look at the other side of the spectrum, your argument is invalid, by the rules of logic. Also, you kind of sound like a jerk...I could think of harsher words to use but I'm going to go with "jerk" here.Kayla Herrera said:Kayla Herrera said:EvilEggCracker said:This is what I like to call "the wind".Kayla Herrera said:Last night, Iw ent into an old hospital, still very structurally sound, and a door unlatched itself and swung open, then a few minutes later slammed shut.
This what I like to call "the fraud".Aqua Trenoble said:You try NOT believing in that sort of thing when your mother is a honest-to-god psychic witch (sorry, MEDICAL INTUITIVE) and has been making decent money on repeat clients for 20 years. I'm not even kidding, if there's good, reliable money in telehealing then there must be something to it.
Care to share what your experiences were?
This is what I like to call "the sucker".Aqua Trenoble said:it was not the wind, look I'm not stupid. We tried to debunk the occurrence, and I am very aware of everything it could have been and we tested it all! I know what I saw and what happened. What the hell can turn a door handle?
no not the wind. THere was no wind that night, very obviously. I'm not stupid, I know what things to check for, the obvious "natural" occurences, but I'm telling you, we could not find an explanation. Tried to debunk it.
As much as I would like to, there is no scientific evidence. Really, that's why we're even having this discussion about whether it's real or not. If you want, you can talk to my mom. Her website is at spiritualmedicine.com. She may be able to prove to you that what she does isn't fake. Obviously there's nothing I can do to change your opinion.
I think that part of the problem is that if someone doesn't believe in something then it doesn't exist for them. Thus it is impossible to prove anything to skeptics because they will always come up for another more reasonable explanation.
If you choose not to have an open mind, that's your business.
Ghosts don't exist. There is no evidence for it. Your little anecdotal stories mean squat. Why? Because human perceptions are very very easily fooled. The day I see evidence for the paranormal is the day I give it some credit. To date there is none - and likely never will be any.
Oh, and if your mother is a real psychic, tell her to try Randi's Million Dollar Psychic Challenge. http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html
For some reason I don't think she will - funny how real scientific analysis causes all the frauds to crawl back into the wordwork.
sir or madam you are a fool, i'm fully aware of the behavious of light and how shadows are made, you don't need to explain it to me, and i know full well that for an invisible thing to cast a shadow is to defy physics, if the thing casting the shadow were visible then it would be fully explainable, however it is invisible which does of course contradict physics, which is why we call it "paranormal" which is why i brought it up, if all the stories on this thread included a logical explanation then they wouldn't be in the right place now would they?Fangobra said:Because that's not falling into the same trap you were just condemning at all.interspark said:not wanting to sound abnoxious but i'm afraid it's the only explanation!
Not only are you attempting to redefine how objects exist, you are also attempting to redefine how light works. If the tree is indeed invisible (which I doubt, but hypothetically) then light will pass through it. We know this because we see things by light bouncing off them into our eyes. If light bounces off it, we can see it. If light is absorbed by it, we can see it, it's black. If light goes right through it and bounces off things on the other side, then it is invisible.interspark said:The logic works as follows, there is a shadow on my window sill, it's shaped like a tree so the thing casting it must be a tree, judging by the defined shape of the shadow the thing must be close, as there are no close trees visible it stands to reasson that the thing casting the shadow is invisible, in contrary to what we understand from science.
Unfortunately what this means for you is that the tree cannot cast a shadow if it is invisible.
Violating a basic physical principle that can be taught to six year olds just to try to justify a phenomenon that YOU personally cannot explain, and that you cannot bring in external assistance on because all you have is anecdotal evidence is very bad form.
Erm, yes.... My intended edit never happened because of horrible internet and people yelling at me.Jonluw said:Yes, but the problem is that they're saying that only on the grounds that they do not know what the explanation is.
Not knowing the explanation for something does not mean that the explanation has to lie outside the current scientific understanding of the world.
Eh, I don't think that that translation is necessarily accurate. If you read the definitions of what they say, all that they're saying is that the explanation doesn't lie within what is accepted as normal. This could mean that the phenomenon requires more scientific analysis or it could mean that space-rays from the planet Xenon are fucking with us. It is possible though, that your translation is what they do actually mean.Jonluw said:What people are saying is: Look at that thing that happened! You can't explain how that happened! That must mean a ghost/paranormal phenomenon did it!
This is stupid. What they're saying is "That can't be explained, therefore I can explain it."
wow, that's crazy! Now I don't feel as crazy for having so many experiences myself. It's hard to tell people about it cause they tell you it's all in your head, and when I tell them I CLEARLY heard a scream and CLEARLY saw a bright blue flash that lit up my whole room, they say I was obviously dreaming.ELD3RGoD said:I believe in them. Living in a house built on a monk burial ground, it's a bit hard not to, especially when I was woken in the night to the sound of heavy footsteps going up and down the landing, stopping just outside of my bedroom, remaining there, seemingly staring in on me, then going back up the landing and stopping outside my mums room. This continued for 4 hours until my mum screamed for my dad to come up the stairs at which point everything went dead.
After than, I have had glasses smash in the night, heavy breath blowing in my face during the day and night, footsteps running up the stairs, the feeling of someone standing behind me in several rooms, 'waking up' before I properly go to sleep, more like drifting off and suddenly sitting up with heavy breathing, cold sweats and a feeling of terror.
My mum has also seen eyes at night, some are very beautiful, others old, others young and others dark and menacing. She went to a psychic and was told that the eyes were people who had died and had locked onto her spirit like a chain. She was told she had a man who watched over her and protected her from evil spirits because she was so susceptible. After that meeting, the eyes appeared once more, before disappearing for good.
In our house we have had people call names when no-one is home, things have been thrown when no-one is around and whenever we change something in the house, things come alive for a month or so before stopping again. Lights turn on and off, my disabled sister used to speak to 'imaginary friends' and open her draws at night before laughing and talking then going to sleep. one night, we heard the draws opening and closing and I thought to myself, "Oh she's at it again" until realisation hit me that she was away for the weekend at a hostel, that was definitely frightening.
There are many more occurrences only made worse by the numerous bodies we have dug up in the front and back gardens.
I can look at it. Poke it with a stick and watch it squirm. I have heard the arguments but the fact remains that there's no evidence for the supernatural. Now that's logic.mandaforever said:I'm sorry, but if you're unable to look at the other side of the spectrum, your argument is invalid, by the rules of logic. Also, you kind of sound like a jerk...I could think of harsher words to use but I'm going to go with "jerk" here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waking_dreammandaforever said:I would love it if this hadn't happened. I still choose not to believe in ghosts, but the experience was so real, I can't write anything off anymore.