Hi. I'm Psyche. How are you all doing? Me? Oh, i'm fine. I just had an interesting Discussion over in the Off Topic section but i thought it would be more appropriate to continue it here. So, anyways, in this Thread
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.839499-Who-is-Your-Waifu?page=3
I expressed my fondness for Bayonetta from the game of the same name. I argued that while she is sexualised to a degree that it's an integral part of her character and obviously designed to appeal to male gamers she manages to avoid the dreaded problem of objectification because her sexualised looks and demeanor are treated as a form of empowerment and she is generally shown to be incredibly capable and confident. However, Zira argued that the fact that she is inherently designed to be appealing to male gamers is a form of objectification in and on itself which is a prefectly valid point. So... who's side are you taking? Is Bayonetta a good female protagonist, able to stand on her own as a character or just a shallow way to pander to male gamers?
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.839499-Who-is-Your-Waifu?page=3
I expressed my fondness for Bayonetta from the game of the same name. I argued that while she is sexualised to a degree that it's an integral part of her character and obviously designed to appeal to male gamers she manages to avoid the dreaded problem of objectification because her sexualised looks and demeanor are treated as a form of empowerment and she is generally shown to be incredibly capable and confident. However, Zira argued that the fact that she is inherently designed to be appealing to male gamers is a form of objectification in and on itself which is a prefectly valid point. So... who's side are you taking? Is Bayonetta a good female protagonist, able to stand on her own as a character or just a shallow way to pander to male gamers?